using the blocked senders list makes no sense - most spam is sent from a
different address every time making blocking addresses pointless. The safe
and blocked lists can hold a total of about 2000 addresses between them -
you could easily fill it up in a day or two by blocking addresses and
domains. It's better to set junk email to high and add addresses to the safe
list. The blocked list should have just a few addresses on it, many times
fewer than the safe lists.

if outlooks filters aren't meeting your needs, get a better filter - one of
the best is spambayes and it's free. Links to this and other programs are at
http://www.slipstick.com/rules/junkmail.htm

--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/

Outlook Tips by email:


Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:



"no spam" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

[snip]

No. Wildcards are not supported.

To me that doesn't make any sense. When you have spam like the following,
", it would be so easy to
input *@*haapavesi*.*