Glen,

There is indeed a policy setting in the .adm file you can deploy. You can
also push this out via a direct registry change.

Outlook 2007:

HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\12.0\Outlook\Prefer ences
DWORD: FBPublishRange
Value: # of months to publish

Outlook 2003:

HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Outlook\Prefer ences
DWORD: FBPublishRange
Value: # of months to publish

Making the change without a policy will allow users the chance to manually
change it, if you want to give them the flexibility.

--
Thanks

greg mansius [MSFT]
Microsoft Office Outlook Support

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please do not send email to this address, post a reply to this newsgroup.

"Glen" wrote in message
...


"Greg Mansius [MSFT]" wrote:

Glen,

Indeed, the free/busy publishing schedule works like you describe it and
changing the free/busy publishing to more months will show more "future"
data in a meeting invite.

Are your users configured in Cached or Online mode?

How did you configure the "4 month" setting? Did you change this for all
users?

Here's a test:

1. Make sure User1 is configured for 6 months of free/busy publishing
2. Have User1 add a test appointment to their own calendar for October 1.
3. Have User1 exit and restart Outlook (this ensures their free/busy data
is
published)
4. Have User2 open a meeting invite and add User1 to a meeting on October
1

Does User2 see the appointment for User1 on October 1 in the free/busy
grid
of the meeting?

--
Thanks

greg mansius [MSFT]
Microsoft Office Outlook Support

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
Please do not send email to this address, post a reply to this newsgroup.

"Glen" wrote in message
...
When scheduling meetings in Outlook, anything scheduled after September
1st
show up for the users as No Information. Is this because of the
'publish
2
months of calendar information" setting in Outlook?

It is the middle of July, so does that mean Outlook will only displays
July
and August as the 2 months? If so, I set my settings and another user
to
display 4 months but still see the same issue after September 1st.

A fix or clarification on what is going on here would be helpful.

I am using Outlook 2007. Others use Outlook 2003. I have a single
Exchange
2003 SP 2 server running on a Windows 2003 server.

Thanks.


Greg,
Thanks for the quick reply. I hadn't closed and re-opened Outlook so that
seems to be the issue.

Most users are set to use cached mode.

So near the end of a month, the users will really only see a little over
one
month of free/busy data? I suppose I could instruct the users to add more
time to their free/busy setting but most people probably haven't noticed
this
before.

Is there a group policy or Exchange setting that would be able to set this
globally?

Thanks again.