I understand your comment about indexing, but I do not understand what "IS'
is.

I need a way to QUICKLY look up phone numbers. Advanced find isn't fast
enough, and the way it display the results is not "friendly" enough to pick
out the callers name (remember, I'm doing this while the phone is ringing)

This leaves me with two questions and a suggestion for Microsoft:
1. How can I identify the fields that ARE indexed?
2. Is there a way to add fields to those indexed?
Suggestion: I can dial a phone number from inside a contact record, please
add the ability for Outlook to pick up the caller ID and tell me who is
calling.

Thanks

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

When you examine the fields that IS indexes, you will note that "Business
Phone 2" is not among them. You use Advanced Find for fields that IS does
not index.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"GWizz" wrote in message
news
I use Windows Search 4.0 with Outlook 2007 to look up contact phone
numbers.
This has been a great tool to allow me to look up a caller ID numbers and
find the associated contact in my address book. But I have found that
phone
numbers in the "Business phone 2" field seem to be invisible to Windows
search. The problem occurs with all contacts in my address book. The
number
is there in the "Business Phone 2" field, but Windows Search cannot find
it.I
have painfully rebuild the index, yet WS still cannot find any numbers
listed
in the "Business Phone 2" field.

Here's what I use this search for...

1. My phone rings
2. I quickly look at the displayed phone number on my caller ID.
3. If there is no name, I enter the last four digits into the search
window
in Outlook contacts.
4. Before the fourth ring, the search results show me all contacts with
those four digits in one of the phone numbers, and I know who's calling.

But this doesn't work if the phone number is in the "Business phone 2"
field.

WHY NOT?
Is there a way to make this work?