Nice arguement Brett, but lacking in fact:
"naive to assume that there is not a limit whatsoever"

You came here for help. Why shoot the (expert) messenger?

Regards

Judy Gleeson
MVP Outlook

www.judygleeson.com
www.deskdoctors.com
Want to be more productive? Outlook 2003 user? Read "7 settings all Outlook
2003 users should change" at www.pragmatix.com.au

"thajuggla4478" wrote in message
...
Most mail servers send a bounce back message notifying the sender that a
maximum number of recipients were met. This, however, is sending a Blank
email to all of the recipients that the email message is being sent to.

At this point in time, I am trying to figure out why when I hit this
number
the Email being sent becomes Blank. When composing an Email what other
Office
resources are being used. This could be a corrupt file.

As far as Outlook not having a limit on the recipients, I do know that as
of
right now the limit has not been met, however, it is naive to assume that
there is not a limit whatsoever.

Brett

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

Provide the evidence that has led you to conclude that this is an Outlook
issue. Outlook places no limits on recipient numbers. Most mail servers
do.
Highly unlikely that this is an Outlook issue.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"thajuggla4478" wrote in
message
...
I am having a problem with Outlook2000 sending blank emails when I send
to
875 people. Anything less than that works fine. Any help would be
greatly
appreciated.