View Single Post
  #4  
Old April 14th 09, 04:00 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 922
Default Separation in Last Name

You would never use the Address Block to construct a merge. When you do, you
give up all control over the merge. Use individual fields to construct a
merge.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Helen" wrote in message
...
I used a traditional merge, utilizing the Address Block function in Word
(also 2003). The name is entered in Outlook as Full Name - Ginger Van der
Hooten - and the Display is Van der Hooten, Ginger.

I don't know what other information you might need to answer my question.
Perhaps it would be better addressed in the Word/Merge group.


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

No way to answer. There is no information here. You would want to post
precise details on how you constructed your merge in Word's mail merge
group.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Helen" wrote in message
...
(Outlook 2003) I have a client whose last name is in three parts,
non-hyphenated (like Ginger Van der Hooven). It shows up correctly in
Contacts under V, but when I utilize Outlook for a mail merge, it drops
the
first part of the last name (she becomes Ginger der Hooven,
alphabetized
under D). Any ideas for a permanent fix?




Ads