Quote:
Originally Posted by nufo
I recognize I'm very late in contributing to this thread…
The snarky MVP postings motivate me to encourage them to consider how Outlook might work instead of being stuck in how it does work. Think CODING not OSMOSIS!
Let's say Tom needs to organize a lunch meeting for fifty people and needs to order sandwiches for attendees. Why should Tom have to process 40 to 50 emails through his mailbox when tracking could report who accepts the meeting? This could be done by offering another option when accepting a meeting: "Accept with tracking (no email)."
|
I agree wholeheartedly. This thread popped up in searching for a resolution on this issue.
You would think that clicking Accept, "Do Not Send a Response" would signal the Exchange server over the network (on an intranet, at least) that you are attending, but you don't want to spam the meeting organizer with emails.
Accept, "Do Not Send a Response" makes no sense. Maybe if they changed it to Accept, "Do not inform organizer, but show on my local calendar", it'd be clearer.