View Single Post
  #4  
Old June 11th 06, 07:18 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Ben M. Schorr - MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default Why doesnt' Outlook 2003 synch with ACT! 2006?

Aloha Lee,

Sorry, I said ".PDF" but meant to say ".DBF".

As for the new version - I don't see Act! 2006 listed on the import programs
in Beta 2 of Outlook 2007. Your best bet is probably to get Act! 2006 to
save in an earlier format, like DBF or CSV perhaps.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr - MVP
http://www.rolandschorr.com
Microsoft OneNote FAQ: http://www.factplace.com/onenotefaq.htm

"Ben M. Schorr - MVP" wrote:

Aloha Lee,

Well, the why of it is pretty easy -- when Outlook 2003 was written
it didn't know anything about .PAD files because Act! 2006 wasn't
available yet. As to a workaround -- can Act! 2006 save in .PDF
format which you could then import into Outlook?

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr - MVP
http://www.rolandschorr.com
Microsoft OneNote FAQ: http://www.factplace.com/onenotefaq.htm
Outlook 2003 only looks for the previous database files .dbf and
will not search for ACT! 2006's .pad database. Isn't there a way to
make Outlook 2003 search for this latest file format? Prior to the
new ACT! 2006, I entered all contact info into ACT! and did a synch
with Outlook to get names and email addresses...now I can't. Is
there a work-around?

Thanks for your reply, Ben...but I don't know if ACT! 2006 can save
the database in a form that Outlook 2003 can digest. Are .pdf files
viable? I'll certainly look into it. I was looking for an update
from Microsoft for Outlook 2003 that would let it be useful to
current developing databases (like a virus update). I'm finding ACT!
a difficult program which doesn't seem to do anything automatically
when it comes to updating...like making sure it's new version would
be useful to the many of us using Outlook in a less than current
version. I wonder if the latest version of Outlook recognizes .pad
files. Does anyone know that? Or is this only a problem that spending
more money on software will solve? Thanks, Lee/



Ads