Yes, you're doing that correctly. Did you read up on Selfcert.exe? As a self-generated certificate, it has no chain of trust from a certificate authority.
--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
"Winnipeg Michael" wrote in message ...
In my attempt to digitally sign it, The Sign As, gives me a choice of only
one certficate, which, "Windows does not have enough information to verify
this certificate.".
Are there other options available? Am I doing this correctly?
Thanks,
Michael
"Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:
Digitially signing the code is the more secure choice.
--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
"Winnipeg Michael" wrote in message ...
Thanks Sue.
I did try lowering the setting, and I thought that I did restart Outlook,
but I guess I didnt properly change the setting.
Thanks for the help.
Which is better though? Lowering the setting, or digitially signing?
Michael
"Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:
Tools | Macros | Security. Restart Outlook after lowering the setting from High. Or digitally sign your project; see http://www.outlookcode.com/d/vb.htm#selfcert
"Winnipeg Michael" wrote in message ...
I created a macro on Friday that would create an email to one person with the
click of a button. It worked fine. I tried it this morning, and its not. I
get a pop-up window saying "The macros in this project are disabled. Please
refer to the online help or documentation of the host application to
determine how to disable macros."
I deleted it, and tried a new one, and it still gives me the error message.
The macro is simple, and I can type it in if anybody thinks they can help.
Thanks,
Michael