My organization (government agency) still uses NT 4 servers and probably
will for some time to come.

If it works for them, let them continue to use it. Just because something
is archaic and unsupported is not a reason to automatically upgrade.

--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] asked:

| In ,
| Sam Rodar typed:
|| I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just
|| wondering if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program that
|| would allow Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a customer with
|| one user in their office using Outlook 2003 and all the others still
|| using Outlook 2000. They are also using Microsoft Mail for
|| inte-office e-mail and would
|| like, if possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft Mail
|| as well.
|| Thanks.
||
|| Sam
|
| In addition to Milly's reply, I don't know what your line of business
| is, but if it's at all in the IT way, note that you might do this
| customer a great service if you were to gently suggest that they stop
| using archaic, unsupported technology for something as important as
| e-mail. If they are a small shop, Small Business Server 2003 might be
| a very good fit for them. If I were to go into a shop still relying
| on OL2000 and MS Mail, the first thing I'd do is write up a proposal
| to get rid of both!