Outlook Banter

Outlook Banter (http://www.outlookbanter.com/)
-   Add-ins for Outlook (http://www.outlookbanter.com/add-ins-outlook/)
-   -   RDO: using TypeOf to determine [OOM] Class (http://www.outlookbanter.com/add-ins-outlook/101929-rdo-using-typeof-determine-oom.html)

Mark McGinty[_2_] April 18th 10 11:31 AM

RDO: using TypeOf to determine [OOM] Class
 
I've been using this successfully to determine whether an item object is a
contact, task or appointment, but I have a related problem: Since all item
types derive from RDOMail, how do I determine that an item is an email
message? (MessageClass = "IPM.Note" by default.)

At the moment I'm testing for all of the RDOMail-derived types, and assuming
that if it isn't any of them, it's an email... (I want to remove all
dependency on the MessageClass string for this level of test.)

Is there a more efficient way to do this?


TIA,
MM



Dmitry Streblechenko April 19th 10 08:08 PM

using TypeOf to determine [OOM] Class
 
That is as good as it gets... If the items is not one of the sepcial items
(such as RDOAppointmentItem), treat it as a generic RDOMail. object.

--
Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
http://www.dimastr.com/
OutlookSpy - Outlook, CDO
and MAPI Developer Tool
-
"Mark McGinty" wrote in message
...
I've been using this successfully to determine whether an item object is a
contact, task or appointment, but I have a related problem: Since all
item types derive from RDOMail, how do I determine that an item is an
email message? (MessageClass = "IPM.Note" by default.)

At the moment I'm testing for all of the RDOMail-derived types, and
assuming that if it isn't any of them, it's an email... (I want to remove
all dependency on the MessageClass string for this level of test.)

Is there a more efficient way to do this?


TIA,
MM





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com