![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have developed a messageStore add in which uses extended Mapi and
exchange client extensions. We are presently porting the client to work correctly with the new OL2007 features, one of which is the new desktop search query builder. I have an issue if I build a search with the importance field set to normal I get what i expect that is a IMAPIFolder::SetSearchCriteria on PR_IMPORTANCE, value set to 0, which is normal. But if I can this value to be either HIGH, or LOW then instead I get content restrictions on the to, bcc, cc and from fields all with the content of the string value 'HIGH' or 'LOW' respectively. This is totally unexpected, I would have expected it to have done the same as above as the normal search except with values 1 or -1 for low. Is this a bug, as if I issue a search through advanced find on a folder then I get the expected SRestriction. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Got the answer - it was a bug in beta2 and is now fixed and working as
expected in beta2 TR. Hope it stays fixed for the released version - ![]() "T-rev" wrote in message ... We have developed a messageStore add in which uses extended Mapi and exchange client extensions. We are presently porting the client to work correctly with the new OL2007 features, one of which is the new desktop search query builder. I have an issue if I build a search with the importance field set to normal I get what i expect that is a IMAPIFolder::SetSearchCriteria on PR_IMPORTANCE, value set to 0, which is normal. But if I can this value to be either HIGH, or LOW then instead I get content restrictions on the to, bcc, cc and from fields all with the content of the string value 'HIGH' or 'LOW' respectively. This is totally unexpected, I would have expected it to have done the same as above as the normal search except with values 1 or -1 for low. Is this a bug, as if I issue a search through advanced find on a folder then I get the expected SRestriction. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
windows desktop search not working | michali | Outlook - Installation | 6 | December 16th 08 10:46 PM |
Windows Desktop Search Required | jcarle | Outlook - Installation | 1 | July 15th 06 10:50 PM |
Windows Desktop Search for XP x64 | Michael Lewis | Outlook - Installation | 1 | June 20th 06 02:44 PM |
Windows Desktop Search on x64 - NO GO! | Peter Bromberg [C# MVP] | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | June 5th 06 04:43 PM |
Outlook 2007 / Desktop Search | kw6575 | Outlook - Installation | 1 | June 2nd 06 03:30 PM |