![]() |
Adding custom buttons to the Standard toolbar versus a custom toolbar
What are the "best practices" for adding custom buttons these days,
and what are the reasons? I need only two buttons, and, because the toolbar would be so small, it has to share a row with another toolbar or else it takes up too much space. Because the Standard toolbar constantly changes size depending on the explorer view, it gets bumped around quite a bit and looks stranded. I also have to remember locations, which is especially noisome on inspector windows. Adding the buttons to the Standard toolbar seems to be ill-regarded but definitely solves these aesthetic problems. In my limited experience, the rule of thumb would be: large number of buttons/ controls, make your own, small number of buttons, add to Standard. Any feedback would be appreciated. |
Adding custom buttons to the Standard toolbar versus a custom toolbar
The choice of where you put your buttons also must evaluate whether or not
buttons for an Inspector might be added to WordMail items. In that case you cannot add your buttons to the Standard toolbar, only to a custom toolbar you create. Other than that your rule of thumb is pretty much what I follow, unless the client has specific UI requirements as to where to place the controls. -- Ken Slovak [MVP - Outlook] http://www.slovaktech.com Author: Professional Programming Outlook 2007. Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options. http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm wrote in message ... What are the "best practices" for adding custom buttons these days, and what are the reasons? I need only two buttons, and, because the toolbar would be so small, it has to share a row with another toolbar or else it takes up too much space. Because the Standard toolbar constantly changes size depending on the explorer view, it gets bumped around quite a bit and looks stranded. I also have to remember locations, which is especially noisome on inspector windows. Adding the buttons to the Standard toolbar seems to be ill-regarded but definitely solves these aesthetic problems. In my limited experience, the rule of thumb would be: large number of buttons/ controls, make your own, small number of buttons, add to Standard. Any feedback would be appreciated. |
Adding custom buttons to the Standard toolbar versus a customtoolbar
On Oct 9, 9:29*am, "Ken Slovak - [MVP - Outlook]"
wrote: The choice of where you put your buttons also must evaluate whether or not buttons for an Inspector might be added to WordMail items. In that case you cannot add your buttons to the Standard toolbar, only to a custom toolbar you create. Other than that your rule of thumb is pretty much what I follow, unless the client has specific UI requirements as to where to place the controls. -- Ken Slovak [MVP - Outlook]http://www.slovaktech.com Author: Professional Programming Outlook 2007. Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options.http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm wrote in message ... What are the "best practices" for adding custom buttons these days, and what are the reasons? I need only two buttons, and, because the toolbar would be so small, it has to share a row with another toolbar or else it takes up too much space. *Because the Standard toolbar constantly changes size depending on the explorer view, it gets bumped around quite a bit and looks stranded. *I also have to remember locations, which is especially noisome on inspector windows. Adding the buttons to the Standard toolbar seems to be ill-regarded but definitely solves these aesthetic problems. *In my limited experience, the rule of thumb would be: large number of buttons/ controls, make your own, small number of buttons, add to Standard. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, Ken! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com