![]() |
Delegate versus sharing
We recently turned over to Outlook 2003 and had 2000 previously.
Most of our administrative staff was given delegate rights to see their manager's calendar. Now they are beseiged with duplicate emails, calendar items disappearing and not appearing at all. All managers have blackberrys. Do I have to manually ask all adminstrators to take off delegate status and have their managers just share their calendar to avoid these issues? No administrator, here, should be acting on behalf of anyone. |
Delegate versus sharing
Do I need to have support staff do this manually?
"Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote: Assuming you have all the latest service packs and the problems still exist, yes, turn of delegation and share the mailboxes. -- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide) Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/ Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter: "Circe" wrote in message ... We recently turned over to Outlook 2003 and had 2000 previously. Most of our administrative staff was given delegate rights to see their manager's calendar. Now they are beseiged with duplicate emails, calendar items disappearing and not appearing at all. All managers have blackberrys. Do I have to manually ask all adminstrators to take off delegate status and have their managers just share their calendar to avoid these issues? No administrator, here, should be acting on behalf of anyone. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com