![]() |
Limited folders
|
Limited folders
|
Limited folders
|
Limited folders
You may have a damaged identity especially if it is the default Main
Identity. File | Identity | Add New Identity. Create a new one and test it. If all is well, you can import your messages and Address Book from the old identity and delete it. How to Create and Use Identities in Outlook Express http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=209169 -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP Outlook Express ~IB-CA~ "jem1945" wrote in message ... My OLE will not allow me to create anymore folders....is there a limit to the number of folders one can set up....is there a solution to expanding the folders capabilities? Thanks. Jim |
Limited folders
Dan wrote:
I had this exact same problem several months back. You are replying to a post from 4th November, that already recieved good advice. PS. if this is your real email address ) you should change it to something like @invalid.net for use on these newsgroups or you can expect to be bombarded by spam forever. I learned that the hard way too Do NOT change it to @invalid.net invalid.net is a valid domain, all email sent to this address will get sent and spam their inbox. You must be careful what you choose for after the @ In this case would be ok or Or leave out the "dot.com" altogether. -- Kath Adams MS MVP - Windows (Outlook Express) |
Limited folders
"Kath Adams" wrote in message
.... You must be careful what you choose for after the @ In this case would be ok or Kath, "ok" for what purpose? Do you realize that these parenthesized strings are "comments"? Hence, they may *look* as if they are unusable but in fact they may work no differently than their uncommented versions. Ah. I think I know where you may be getting that idea. Repost of my comments to Roland in July: paste For another example of what I think must be flawed advice see http://support.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.aspx "Use a modified E-mail address" which apparently suggests (only) putting "munging" in parentheses... After finding out about "comments" I suspect the examples are in fact valid and wouldn't have any preventive value at all: ; o ref http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html quote A.5. White space, comments, and other oddities /quote /ref FYI Robert --- /paste |
Limited folders
Robert Aldwinckle wrote:
"Kath Adams" wrote in message ... You must be careful what you choose for after the @ In this case would be ok or Kath, "ok" for what purpose? Do you realize that these parenthesized strings are "comments"? Hence, they may *look* as if they are unusable but in fact they may work no differently than their uncommented versions. Ah. I think I know where you may be getting that idea. Repost of my comments to Roland in July: paste For another example of what I think must be flawed advice see http://support.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.aspx "Use a modified E-mail address" which apparently suggests (only) putting "munging" in parentheses... After finding out about "comments" I suspect the examples are in fact valid and wouldn't have any preventive value at all: ; o ref http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html quote A.5. White space, comments, and other oddities /quote /ref FYI Robert --- /paste Robert, It's always worked ok for me? For example :- The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '. Subject 'test', Account: 'mail.mvps.org', Server: 'mail.mvps.org', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '501 5.5.2 Syntax error in address ', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 501, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 -- Kath Adams MS MVP - Windows (Outlook Express) |
Limited folders
"Kath Adams" wrote in message
.... Robert, It's always worked ok for me? For example :- The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '. Subject 'test', Account: 'mail.mvps.org', Server: 'mail.mvps.org', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '501 5.5.2 Syntax error in address ', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 501, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 I guess that server doesn't implement that part of the RFC then. OTOH I'm not even clear about how widely implemented RFC2822 is or should be. It was mostly an ironic comment about its implications for some kinds of antispamming techniques. Robert --- |
Limited folders
"You must be careful what you choose for after the @"
For what purpose? Nothing in OE help files warned me that I must be very careful about this. I guess you mean because someone else will get the spam that would have otherwise be targeted at me for inputting my real address which I am also not warned about. Well, Good! I have a good mind to change the address to something like billgates@microsoft .com or someone elses address at microsoft so that they will get bombarded with spam, and maybe wake up to how the spammers are harvesting off their own network and put a fix to it. Maybe we should all make our addresses appear that way to send them the message. So long as the spam ain't being targeted at me. Thanks for the great idea Kath. Now let me see if I can find a good email address at microsoft to copy hahahaha "Robert Aldwinckle" wrote in message ... "Kath Adams" wrote in message ... Robert, It's always worked ok for me? For example :- The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '. Subject 'test', Account: 'mail.mvps.org', Server: 'mail.mvps.org', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '501 5.5.2 Syntax error in address ', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 501, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 I guess that server doesn't implement that part of the RFC then. OTOH I'm not even clear about how widely implemented RFC2822 is or should be. It was mostly an ironic comment about its implications for some kinds of antispamming techniques. Robert --- |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com