![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sometimes simply turning off the email scanning doesn't work (a lot of
times, in fact). The AV program doesn't like to play well with others. "puzzledinmn" wrote in message ... | Would a reinstall of Outlook Express (and possibly IE7) help my problems? I | see you can uninstall from the control panel. Where would a fresh copy of | OE6 reside? | | for other suffering souls- | 1. running with email virus scanning turned off did not help | 2. replacing my computer RAM did not help | 3. OE6 hung when I clicked on a http link last weekend. It took down IE7 | with it. | 4. Norton directed me to upgrade to Norton Internet Security 2007.2. | However, after an identity switch this morning, I had blank emails. Yes, I | turned off email scanning after I installed 2007.2 Yes, it doesn't make a | difference which identity I am switching too. Looks like back to square one | to me. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Willett" wrote:
Sometimes simply turning off the email scanning doesn't work (a lot of times, in fact). The AV program doesn't like to play well with others. That may be a useful observation, but what solution in particular are you suggesting? Uninstalling the security program and running without it? Also, why aren't thousands of computer users having these problems? Thanks. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With NAV's Email Protection still disabled but NAV still running:
One or more of your current Identity may have been damaged by NAV, especially if one of them is the default Main Identity. Try one or more of your accounts in a new Named Identity (File Identities Add new identity). Assuming all is well, (1) compact all folders in the old identity, (2) import messages from the old identity into the new one, and then (3) delete the old one (File Identities Manage Identities). To avoid such corruption in futu - Don't use Inbox or Sent Items to archive messages. Move them to local folders created for this purpose. - Empty Deleted Items folder daily. - Disable Background Compacting [not available in SP2] and frequently perform a manual compact of all OE folders while "working offline". More at http://www.insideoe.com/files/maintain.htm - WinXP SP2 only: Do not shut down your machine while Windows is automatically compacting your message store. - Your anti-virus application's email scanning feature can also cause such corruption. Disable it. It provides no additional protection. -- ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear) MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User) AumHa VSOP & Admin; DTS-L.org puzzledinmn wrote: Would a reinstall of Outlook Express (and possibly IE7) help my problems? I see you can uninstall from the control panel. Where would a fresh copy of OE6 reside? for other suffering souls- 1. running with email virus scanning turned off did not help 2. replacing my computer RAM did not help 3. OE6 hung when I clicked on a http link last weekend. It took down IE7 with it. 4. Norton directed me to upgrade to Norton Internet Security 2007.2. However, after an identity switch this morning, I had blank emails. Yes, I turned off email scanning after I installed 2007.2 Yes, it doesn't make a difference which identity I am switching too. Looks like back to square one to me. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"puzzledinmn" wrote in message
... "Tom Willett" wrote: Sometimes simply turning off the email scanning doesn't work (a lot of times, in fact). The AV program doesn't like to play well with others. That may be a useful observation, but what solution in particular are you suggesting? Uninstalling the security program and running without it? Also, why aren't thousands of computer users having these problems? Thanks. Norton and McAfee place hooks deep into the operating system, slowing down everything the computer does and often causing real problems with other programs, not just mail programs. I used the Norton Utilities for years, but Peter Norton sold them to Symantec sometime after Win95 came out. The next version that came out caused me problems and I uninstalled it. I kept hearing about these problems and never went back. I already did not like McAfee. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM http://www.fjsmjs.com Answer in newsgroup. Don't expect an answer to email. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM" wrote in message ... "puzzledinmn" wrote in message ... "Tom Willett" wrote: Sometimes simply turning off the email scanning doesn't work (a lot of times, in fact). The AV program doesn't like to play well with others. That may be a useful observation, but what solution in particular are you suggesting? Uninstalling the security program and running without it? Also, why aren't thousands of computer users having these problems? Thanks. Norton and McAfee place hooks deep into the operating system, slowing down everything the computer does and often causing real problems with other programs, not just mail programs. I used the Norton Utilities for years, but Peter Norton sold them to Symantec sometime after Win95 came out. The next version that came out caused me problems and I uninstalled it. I kept hearing about these problems and never went back. I already did not like McAfee. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM http://www.fjsmjs.com Answer in newsgroup. Don't expect an answer to email. I can honestly say that the vast majority of the machines I've encountered that have "Odd" problems like running slow, locking up or randomly crashing can be improved if not completely fixed by removing Norton. This applies to the retail versions, the Corporate Editions seem much better. Corporate users of course are not so influenced by hype and they certainly don't want "Bloat". Symantec it seems are only interested in selling "Claims of functionality" rather than functionality itself. The use of any "Proxy" type of software with OE seems problematic except I have to say that I've never had a problem with the mail filter "PopFile". Why that is so is anybody's guess, and PopFile would not suit everybody, but it seems odd that if one system can work effectively others can't ![]() has been developed on sourceforge and the author has always been responsive to feedback, which I am sure makes a difference. Charlie |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It makes all the difference in the world when a developer is involved with
clients, and not just mass producing untested software that results in loss of functionality and data. And I didn't just mean Vista. G steve "Charlie Tame" wrote in message ... "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM" wrote in message ... "puzzledinmn" wrote in message ... "Tom Willett" wrote: Sometimes simply turning off the email scanning doesn't work (a lot of times, in fact). The AV program doesn't like to play well with others. That may be a useful observation, but what solution in particular are you suggesting? Uninstalling the security program and running without it? Also, why aren't thousands of computer users having these problems? Thanks. Norton and McAfee place hooks deep into the operating system, slowing down everything the computer does and often causing real problems with other programs, not just mail programs. I used the Norton Utilities for years, but Peter Norton sold them to Symantec sometime after Win95 came out. The next version that came out caused me problems and I uninstalled it. I kept hearing about these problems and never went back. I already did not like McAfee. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM http://www.fjsmjs.com Answer in newsgroup. Don't expect an answer to email. I can honestly say that the vast majority of the machines I've encountered that have "Odd" problems like running slow, locking up or randomly crashing can be improved if not completely fixed by removing Norton. This applies to the retail versions, the Corporate Editions seem much better. Corporate users of course are not so influenced by hype and they certainly don't want "Bloat". Symantec it seems are only interested in selling "Claims of functionality" rather than functionality itself. The use of any "Proxy" type of software with OE seems problematic except I have to say that I've never had a problem with the mail filter "PopFile". Why that is so is anybody's guess, and PopFile would not suit everybody, but it seems odd that if one system can work effectively others can't ![]() PopFile has been developed on sourceforge and the author has always been responsive to feedback, which I am sure makes a difference. Charlie |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Cochran" wrote in message ... It makes all the difference in the world when a developer is involved with clients, and not just mass producing untested software that results in loss of functionality and data. And I didn't just mean Vista. G steve "Charlie Tame" wrote in message ... "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM" wrote in message ... "puzzledinmn" wrote in message ... "Tom Willett" wrote: Sometimes simply turning off the email scanning doesn't work (a lot of times, in fact). The AV program doesn't like to play well with others. That may be a useful observation, but what solution in particular are you suggesting? Uninstalling the security program and running without it? Also, why aren't thousands of computer users having these problems? Thanks. Norton and McAfee place hooks deep into the operating system, slowing down everything the computer does and often causing real problems with other programs, not just mail programs. I used the Norton Utilities for years, but Peter Norton sold them to Symantec sometime after Win95 came out. The next version that came out caused me problems and I uninstalled it. I kept hearing about these problems and never went back. I already did not like McAfee. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM http://www.fjsmjs.com Answer in newsgroup. Don't expect an answer to email. I can honestly say that the vast majority of the machines I've encountered that have "Odd" problems like running slow, locking up or randomly crashing can be improved if not completely fixed by removing Norton. This applies to the retail versions, the Corporate Editions seem much better. Corporate users of course are not so influenced by hype and they certainly don't want "Bloat". Symantec it seems are only interested in selling "Claims of functionality" rather than functionality itself. The use of any "Proxy" type of software with OE seems problematic except I have to say that I've never had a problem with the mail filter "PopFile". Why that is so is anybody's guess, and PopFile would not suit everybody, but it seems odd that if one system can work effectively others can't ![]() has always been responsive to feedback, which I am sure makes a difference. Charlie |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "i_takeuti" . ne.jp wrote in message ... "Steve Cochran" wrote in message ... It makes all the difference in the world when a developer is involved with clients, and not just mass producing untested software that results in loss of functionality and data. And I didn't just mean Vista. G steve "Charlie Tame" wrote in message ... "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM" wrote in message ... "puzzledinmn" wrote in message ... "Tom Willett" wrote: Sometimes simply turning off the email scanning doesn't work (a lot of times, in fact). The AV program doesn't like to play well with others. That may be a useful observation, but what solution in particular are you suggesting? Uninstalling the security program and running without it? Also, why aren't thousands of computer users having these problems? Thanks. Norton and McAfee place hooks deep into the operating system, slowing down everything the computer does and often causing real problems with other programs, not just mail programs. I used the Norton Utilities for years, but Peter Norton sold them to Symantec sometime after Win95 came out. The next version that came out caused me problems and I uninstalled it. I kept hearing about these problems and never went back. I already did not like McAfee. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM http://www.fjsmjs.com Answer in newsgroup. Don't expect an answer to email. I can honestly say that the vast majority of the machines I've encountered that have "Odd" problems like running slow, locking up or randomly crashing can be improved if not completely fixed by removing Norton. This applies to the retail versions, the Corporate Editions seem much better. Corporate users of course are not so influenced by hype and they certainly don't want "Bloat". Symantec it seems are only interested in selling "Claims of functionality" rather than functionality itself. The use of any "Proxy" type of software with OE seems problematic except I have to say that I've never had a problem with the mail filter "PopFile". Why that is so is anybody's guess, and PopFile would not suit everybody, but it seems odd that if one system can work effectively others can't ![]() has always been responsive to feedback, which I am sure makes a difference. Charlie |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "puzzledinmn" wrote in message ... I upgraded my system to 640MB of RAM from 256 and this problem is back in spades. It occurs faster(30 min. or so) now and seems to occur most often after I switch accounts. I am getting hangs on the first IE7 tab too. I am giving my computer the three fingered salute quite often to kill OE6 and IE7 and then restart them. A friend said he had to switch to Firefox and Thunderbird to use his computer. I tested the new RAM with Dell Bios Diagnostics and MemTest. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "puzzledinmn" wrote in message ... My Outlook Express 6 emails have been going blank after Outlook has been running a few hours. I click on different inbox messages and they are all blank. I close Outlook and restart it and everything is back to normal. No error message is given by Outlook. Has anyone encountered this and been able to solve it? I have 2 Outlook accounts and automatic Windows XP Home updates. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blank emails | Fred Kroesche | Outlook Express | 7 | September 11th 06 02:30 PM |
why are some incoming emails taking several hours to get to me? | xluke | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | August 4th 06 07:44 PM |
Blank emails | PatK | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | August 3rd 06 10:16 PM |
Can the time be displayed in half hours like hours on calendar? | Kristy | Outlook - Calandaring | 1 | July 31st 06 08:11 PM |
Blank emails | Matt Brinton | Outlook Express | 6 | March 31st 06 02:48 AM |