![]() |
Outlook Web Access Development
We are in the process of considering the appropriate platform for the
first release of the next generation of our software we develop in house. Although not a classic example of a typical web application, we have several business reasons that may take us to a web deployment. I am researching the possibilities of what our interface would look like on the web. Outlook Web Access does a very good job of blurring the line between web application and desktop app. Looking at the source code it appears OWA 2003 is mostly accomplishing its look and feel with traditional HTML and a whole lot of JavaScript. Does anyone know if this assumption is correct? Was it developed with any developer tools to generate the scripts, or was it done with more traditional web development? We have a shop of developers very familiar with VB.NET and Visual Studio, but we would likely not be able to develop a web app comprised of hand-written JavaScript and HTML. Also, I am trying to find out what capabilities IE has that is not supplied by Firefox and Netscape (at least without a plug-in). If there is a more appropriate forum for this topic, please let me know. |
Outlook Web Access Development
Microsoft.public.exchange is a better group since OWA, despite its confusing
name, is a part of Exchange not Outlook. -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After furious head scratching, AaronTJ asked: | We are in the process of considering the appropriate platform for the | first release of the next generation of our software we develop in | house. Although not a classic example of a typical web application, we | have several business reasons that may take us to a web deployment. I | am researching the possibilities of what our interface would look like | on the web. | | Outlook Web Access does a very good job of blurring the line between | web application and desktop app. Looking at the source code it | appears OWA 2003 is mostly accomplishing its look and feel with | traditional HTML and a whole lot of JavaScript. | | Does anyone know if this assumption is correct? Was it developed with | any developer tools to generate the scripts, or was it done with more | traditional web development? We have a shop of developers very | familiar with VB.NET and Visual Studio, but we would likely not be | able to develop a web app comprised of hand-written JavaScript and | HTML. | | Also, I am trying to find out what capabilities IE has that is not | supplied by Firefox and Netscape (at least without a plug-in). | | If there is a more appropriate forum for this topic, please let me | know. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com