![]() |
Filtering out junk mail in Outlook 2003
I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out
junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go into the junk email folder and losing them? Thanks, Scott |
Filtering out junk mail in Outlook 2003
In oups.com,
Uncle Scotty typed: I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go into the junk email folder and losing them? Thanks, Scott You can't....with every increase in your spam detection, there is an increase in the possibility of "false positives". I suggest you regularly empty out the junk email folder so that the 'unread message' notification is useful information to you - but you should check for false positives & whitelist them before purging the folder, of course. |
Filtering out junk mail in Outlook 2003
What do you mean by whitelist? And, how does emptying out junk mail
make the 'unread message' notification useful information to me? Thanks again, Scott Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote: In oups.com, Uncle Scotty typed: I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go into the junk email folder and losing them? Thanks, Scott You can't....with every increase in your spam detection, there is an increase in the possibility of "false positives". I suggest you regularly empty out the junk email folder so that the 'unread message' notification is useful information to you - but you should check for false positives & whitelist them before purging the folder, of course. |
Filtering out junk mail in Outlook 2003
In ups.com,
Uncle Scotty typed: What do you mean by whitelist? When you see a valid message that was put in the junk e-mail folder, and you click Not Junk.... And, how does emptying out junk mail make the 'unread message' notification useful information to me? Because it will be an easy reminder for you to look at the new mail, to see if you need to whitelist it. Thanks again, Scott Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote: In oups.com, Uncle Scotty typed: I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go into the junk email folder and losing them? Thanks, Scott You can't....with every increase in your spam detection, there is an increase in the possibility of "false positives". I suggest you regularly empty out the junk email folder so that the 'unread message' notification is useful information to you - but you should check for false positives & whitelist them before purging the folder, of course. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com