Outlook Banter

Outlook Banter (http://www.outlookbanter.com/)
-   Outlook - General Queries (http://www.outlookbanter.com/outlook-general-queries/)
-   -   Filtering out junk mail in Outlook 2003 (http://www.outlookbanter.com/outlook-general-queries/29917-filtering-out-junk-mail-outlook.html)

Uncle Scotty October 14th 06 03:41 AM

Filtering out junk mail in Outlook 2003
 
I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out
junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low
to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go into
the junk email folder and losing them?

Thanks, Scott


Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] October 14th 06 07:58 PM

Filtering out junk mail in Outlook 2003
 
In oups.com,
Uncle Scotty typed:
I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out
junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low
to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go
into the junk email folder and losing them?

Thanks, Scott


You can't....with every increase in your spam detection, there is an
increase in the possibility of "false positives". I suggest you regularly
empty out the junk email folder so that the 'unread message' notification is
useful information to you - but you should check for false positives &
whitelist them before purging the folder, of course.



Uncle Scotty October 18th 06 04:43 AM

Filtering out junk mail in Outlook 2003
 
What do you mean by whitelist? And, how does emptying out junk mail
make the 'unread message' notification useful information to me?

Thanks again, Scott

Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
In oups.com,
Uncle Scotty typed:
I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out
junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low
to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go
into the junk email folder and losing them?

Thanks, Scott


You can't....with every increase in your spam detection, there is an
increase in the possibility of "false positives". I suggest you regularly
empty out the junk email folder so that the 'unread message' notification is
useful information to you - but you should check for false positives &
whitelist them before purging the folder, of course.



Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] October 18th 06 02:57 PM

Filtering out junk mail in Outlook 2003
 
In ups.com,
Uncle Scotty typed:
What do you mean by whitelist?


When you see a valid message that was put in the junk e-mail folder, and you
click Not Junk....

And, how does emptying out junk mail
make the 'unread message' notification useful information to me?


Because it will be an easy reminder for you to look at the new mail, to see
if you need to whitelist it.

Thanks again, Scott

Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
In oups.com,
Uncle Scotty typed:
I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out
junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from
low to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails
go into the junk email folder and losing them?

Thanks, Scott


You can't....with every increase in your spam detection, there is an
increase in the possibility of "false positives". I suggest you
regularly empty out the junk email folder so that the 'unread
message' notification is useful information to you - but you should
check for false positives & whitelist them before purging the
folder, of course.






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com