Outlook Banter

Outlook Banter (http://www.outlookbanter.com/)
-   Outlook - General Queries (http://www.outlookbanter.com/outlook-general-queries/)
-   -   Microsoft PO3 Accounts & Unicode Encoding (http://www.outlookbanter.com/outlook-general-queries/86160-microsoft-po3-accounts-unicode-encoding.html)

D. Spencer Hines[_4_] February 12th 09 05:42 AM

Microsoft PO3 Accounts & Unicode Encoding
 
What's the difference between UTF-7 and UTF-8?

And do we have to use Unicode to send messages in languages other than
English -- in order to get all the diacritics and Non-Latin alphabets?

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor




FromTheRafters February 12th 09 11:32 AM

Microsoft PO3 Accounts & Unicode Encoding
 
"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...
What's the difference between UTF-7 and UTF-8?


One bit.

And do we have to use Unicode to send messages in languages other than
English -- in order to get all the diacritics and Non-Latin alphabets?


Yes, that is you need more than ASCII offers.



D. Spencer Hines[_4_] February 12th 09 03:45 PM

Microsoft PO3 Accounts & Unicode Encoding
 
Thank you.

What does that one bit get for you?

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"FromTheRafters" wrote in message
...

"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...


What's the difference between UTF-7 and UTF-8?


One bit.

And do we have to use Unicode to send messages in languages other than
English -- in order to get all the diacritics and Non-Latin alphabets?


Yes, that is you need more than ASCII offers.




F.H. Muffman February 12th 09 04:47 PM

Microsoft PO3 Accounts & Unicode Encoding
 
What's the difference between UTF-7 and UTF-8?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compari...code_encodings

--
f.h.
Microsoft Outlook MVP



FromTheRafters February 12th 09 05:41 PM

Microsoft PO3 Accounts & Unicode Encoding
 
Twice what you previously had. Each additional bit in binary doubles
the possibilities. One bit can describe two states, two can describe
four, three can describe eight, etc...

Most 7-bit systems will actually use seven bits for encoding and use
the eighth bit for a parity check. This is a very simple error detection
scheme in which the total number of ones in a byte are counted and
the parity bit is added (or not added) to make the total odd or even
in accordance with whether odd or even parity was chosen for the
scheme. Any bit changed during transmission by noise would usually
cause a byte to be rejected by failing the parity check. The rejected
byte would have to be resent.

More modern error detection schemes have the added ability to
correct some errors rather than to just have the data resent. If the
parity bit is not needed for error detection, then why not use it as
part of the actual encoding - doubling the possibilities?

"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...
Thank you.

What does that one bit get for you?

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"FromTheRafters" wrote in message
...

"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...


What's the difference between UTF-7 and UTF-8?


One bit.

And do we have to use Unicode to send messages in languages other than
English -- in order to get all the diacritics and Non-Latin alphabets?


Yes, that is you need more than ASCII offers.






D. Spencer Hines[_4_] February 12th 09 05:50 PM

Microsoft PO3 Accounts & Unicode Encoding
 
Great!

Thank you kindly.

So Unicode capability is essential for sending and receiving messages in
many foreign languages, where ASCII just can't carry the freight.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"FromTheRafters" wrote in message
...

Twice what you previously had. Each additional bit in binary doubles
the possibilities. One bit can describe two states, two can describe
four, three can describe eight, etc...

Most 7-bit systems will actually use seven bits for encoding and use
the eighth bit for a parity check. This is a very simple error detection
scheme in which the total number of ones in a byte are counted and
the parity bit is added (or not added) to make the total odd or even
in accordance with whether odd or even parity was chosen for the
scheme. Any bit changed during transmission by noise would usually
cause a byte to be rejected by failing the parity check. The rejected
byte would have to be resent.

More modern error detection schemes have the added ability to
correct some errors rather than to just have the data resent. If the
parity bit is not needed for error detection, then why not use it as
part of the actual encoding - doubling the possibilities?

"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...


Thank you.

What does that one bit get for you?

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"FromTheRafters" wrote in message
...

"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...


What's the difference between UTF-7 and UTF-8?

One bit.

And do we have to use Unicode to send messages in languages other than
English -- in order to get all the diacritics and Non-Latin alphabets?

Yes, that is you need more than ASCII offers.





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com