![]() |
|
Email Scanning
VERY Unprofessional...
Cochran can't see the forest for the trees. He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express, where he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues. He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song. Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus. Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I... KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED. DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY. DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG... THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences. Exitus Acta Probat. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "Steve Cochran" wrote in message ... Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted ---------------------------------------------------------------- Email Scanning has never given me any problems. This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a teapot as well as bum dope. I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra layer of protection... If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss -- and their problem, when something goes wrong.... AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts. Benefits All 'Round... For Both Me & My Correspondents. It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it. I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it. Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all. Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows Live Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Further: Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems. CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems. Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and _Goldfinger_] uses redundant and overlapping security systems. The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems. Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security systems. Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ redundant and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of little rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran.... Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these newsgroups are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have seen it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT regularly Clean Up and Compact their files. So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the Terrible Evils of Email Scanning... Amusing little fellows they are. Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation... -- D. Spencer Hines Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum |
Email Scanning
Aha. I see that you are starting the second phase of your trolling. Get a life
already -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message ... VERY Unprofessional... Cochran can't see the forest for the trees. He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express, where he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues. He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song. Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus. Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I... KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED. DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY. DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG... THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences. Exitus Acta Probat. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "Steve Cochran" wrote in message ... Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted ---------------------------------------------------------------- Email Scanning has never given me any problems. This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a teapot as well as bum dope. I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra layer of protection... If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss -- and their problem, when something goes wrong.... AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts. Benefits All 'Round... For Both Me & My Correspondents. It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it. I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it. Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all. Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows Live Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Further: Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems. CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems. Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and _Goldfinger_] uses redundant and overlapping security systems. The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems. Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security systems. Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ redundant and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of little rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran.... Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these newsgroups are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have seen it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT regularly Clean Up and Compact their files. So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the Terrible Evils of Email Scanning... Amusing little fellows they are. Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation... -- D. Spencer Hines Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum |
Email Scanning
Not particularly bright, is he?
Hal -- Hal Hostetler, CPBE -- Senior Engineer/MIS -- MS MVP-Print/Imaging -- WA7BGX http://www.kvoa.com -- "When News breaks, we fix it!" KVOA Television, Tucson, AZ. NBC Channel 4 Still Cadillacin' - www.badnewsbluesband.com "Peter Foldes" wrote in message ... Aha. I see that you are starting the second phase of your trolling. Get a life already -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message ... VERY Unprofessional... Cochran can't see the forest for the trees. He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express, where he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues. He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song. Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus. Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I... KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED. DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY. DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG... THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences. Exitus Acta Probat. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "Steve Cochran" wrote in message ... Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted ---------------------------------------------------------------- Email Scanning has never given me any problems. This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a teapot as well as bum dope. I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra layer of protection... If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss -- and their problem, when something goes wrong.... AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts. Benefits All 'Round... For Both Me & My Correspondents. It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it. I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it. Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all. Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows Live Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Further: Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems. CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems. Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and _Goldfinger_] uses redundant and overlapping security systems. The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems. Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security systems. Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ redundant and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of little rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran.... Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these newsgroups are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have seen it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT regularly Clean Up and Compact their files. So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the Terrible Evils of Email Scanning... Amusing little fellows they are. Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation... -- D. Spencer Hines Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum |
Email Scanning
I feel sorry for anyone that knows you in real life.
"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message ... VERY Unprofessional... Cochran can't see the forest for the trees. He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express, where he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues. He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song. Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus. Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I... KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED. DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY. DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG... THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences. Exitus Acta Probat. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "Steve Cochran" wrote in message ... Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted ---------------------------------------------------------------- Email Scanning has never given me any problems. This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a teapot as well as bum dope. I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra layer of protection... If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss -- and their problem, when something goes wrong.... AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts. Benefits All 'Round... For Both Me & My Correspondents. It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it. I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it. Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all. Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows Live Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Further: Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems. CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems. Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and _Goldfinger_] uses redundant and overlapping security systems. The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems. Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security systems. Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ redundant and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of little rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran.... Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these newsgroups are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have seen it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT regularly Clean Up and Compact their files. So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the Terrible Evils of Email Scanning... Amusing little fellows they are. Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation... -- D. Spencer Hines Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum |
Email Scanning
Totally Non-Substantive, Unprofessional Reply Duly Noted...
And Discarded With Wry Amusement. Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum "Steve Cochran" wrote in message ... I feel sorry for anyone that [sic] knows you in real life. "D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message ... VERY Unprofessional... Cochran can't see the forest for the trees. He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express, where he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues. He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song. Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus. Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I... KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED. DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY. DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG... THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences. Exitus Acta Probat. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "Steve Cochran" wrote in message ... Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted ---------------------------------------------------------------- Email Scanning has never given me any problems. This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a teapot as well as bum dope. I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra layer of protection... If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss -- and their problem, when something goes wrong.... AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts. Benefits All 'Round... For Both Me & My Correspondents. It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it. I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it. Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all. Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows Live Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent. DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Further: Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems. CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems. Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and _Goldfinger_] uses redundant and overlapping security systems. The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems. Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security systems. Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ redundant and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of little rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran.... Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these newsgroups are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have seen it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT regularly Clean Up and Compact their files. So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the Terrible Evils of Email Scanning... Amusing little fellows they are. Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation... -- D. Spencer Hines Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum |
Email Scanning
"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message ... | VERY Unprofessional... | | Cochran can't see the forest for the trees. | | He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express, where | he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues. | | He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song. snip crap Why don't you write your own e-mail software? (And check back to the NG in 2 years with your progress) |
Email Scanning
|
Email Scanning
"kate" wrote in message
... nothing And your purpose of posting quotes of someone else's message is? -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] |
Email Scanning
Also quoted from posts from over 1 year ago
-- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]" wrote in message ... "kate" wrote in message ... nothing And your purpose of posting quotes of someone else's message is? -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com