![]() |
laptop vs desktop
Colleague warned me to be careful - that he had heard there are significant
differences in functionality between installing Outlook 2003 on laptops vs connected desktop machines. I have tried to find info on this without much success. Can anyone help? Thanks |
laptop vs desktop
I have Outlook 2003 installed on both my desktop and my tablet and I find no
differences between them whatsoever. Hal -- Hal Hostetler, CPBE -- Senior Engineer/MIS -- MS MVP-Print/Imaging -- WA7BGX http://www.kvoa.com -- "When News breaks, we fix it!" KVOA Television, Tucson, AZ. NBC Channel 4 Still Cadillacin' - www.badnewsbluesband.com "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... Colleague warned me to be careful - that he had heard there are significant differences in functionality between installing Outlook 2003 on laptops vs connected desktop machines. I have tried to find info on this without much success. Can anyone help? Thanks |
laptop vs desktop
who said this? give him several slaps to awaken him
"Paul Scott" wrote in message ... Colleague warned me to be careful - that he had heard there are significant differences in functionality between installing Outlook 2003 on laptops vs connected desktop machines. I have tried to find info on this without much success. Can anyone help? Thanks |
laptop vs desktop
Paul Scott wrote:
Colleague warned me to be careful - that he had heard there are significant differences in functionality between installing Outlook 2003 on laptops vs connected desktop machines. He's wrong. Outlook works identically on both. There are some features of Outlook that make more sense when used on a laptop (like offline folders), but the features exist in any installation. -- Brian Tillman |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com