![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have just read a few dozen posts from this guy Russ Valentine. I have
never come across anyone whose neck was so far up their arse! Has he actually ever helped anyone? Budgie "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: The point I was making is that it takes a long time for synchronization software to get updated to the point it is totally reliable with a new Outlook version, even if it is Microsoft's own synchronization software. For that reason, I never attempt to use a new Outlook version as the database for a synchronization program until it is at least a year out of release. I also don't use a new OS or Office version on my production partition until a year more after its release. Half of the third party apps and drivers I need won't work with a new OS or Office version for at least a year. I have a lot of headaches already. I do not need the headache of being an early adopter. As for the rest of your question, the other point I would make is that I never rely on an operating system's "automatic transfer" utilities to transfer Outlook data. I have never seen one yet that can transfer Outlook data reliably. No, you may not put words in my mouth as to what is "crap" and what isn't. I have no idea what Microsoft's stance is on any of this. I'm sure they are convinced that their products are 100% reliable and compatible as soon as they RTM, so there is no "solution" needed. I'm only imparting my own personal experience and "street smarts." I never quite understand why people who rush to adopt all the latest software releases expect those disparate programs to work flawlessly together right away. Common sense would dictate a more careful and thoughtful approach to the adoption of new technology. There are countless parallels to that wisdom in other venues where the stakes are often much higher. Read up on the problems created by the early widespread adoption of drug-eluting coronary stents. Life teaches you lessons when you pay attention. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Hoops" wrote in message news ![]() Russ, I was using Microsoft ActiveSync 4.5 software with Outlook 2003 on XP Professional on my old Notebook. To transfer from one computer to another Microsoft provide transfer software. The Microsoft transfer software provided by VISTA is the VISTA Backup and Restore Centre. As instructed I copied the VISTA Backup and Restore Centre software utility to my XP Notebook - I ran it as instructed which created a Transfer Log and then, as instructed, I Restored this to my Vista Notebook. That transferred my contacts into Outlook 2007. Thereafter I have synced using the only software that works with VISTA which is Microsoft's Mobile device Centre. This keeps my contacts current with my Smartphone mobile computer. As needed, I have tried to forward emails received to addresses in my contacts by clicking on the "To" field which takes me to "name select" in contacts and then clicking on the recipient’s name and hitting send. All very simple & straight forward and as Microsoft instructs us to do.. So as I understand it Russ, you say that Microsoft's Mobile device Centre is crap and not 10% as good as Microsoft ActiveSync 4.5? If so, I agree with you. What is the solution being offered by Microsoft?? I would expect with such a basic problem as this that Microsoft would be bending over backwards to fix it - but they aren’t?? It is as if they simply don't care that their products don't work as they sell them to. Do you have a fix to this problem that will allow me to sync my contacts daily with my Smartphone and to be able to sent emails using my Outlook 2007 & contacts.? John "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: More details on how you are selecting the recipients, how you copied the data, and how you configured the Outlook Address Book are required even to start on this one. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Richard Sargeant" wrote in message ... Russ, Unfortunately I have exactly the same problems as Dave, using exactly the same software versions. In my case, mindful of problems I've previously experienced with old format and/or corrupted pst files, when I upgraded from Outlook 2003 I created a shiny new empty pst file. Then I opened the old 2003 pst file and copied everything from it to my new file. Finally I closed the old file. Now, under conditions I haven't quite got my finger on yet, Outlook loops on send/receive, the message is not sent and I have to terminate Outlook. And yes, I too have a Windows Mobile device, 2003R2 in my case. But I deleted everything from it before setting up a new partnership and filling it with the contents of my new pst file. So there seems to be more to this than problems caused by importing or synchronising. RS |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Budgie" wrote in message
... I have just read a few dozen posts from this guy Russ Valentine. I have never come across anyone whose neck was so far up their arse! Has he actually ever helped anyone? More than you can ever imagine. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vista Windows Mail works fine...but Outlook 2007 won't receive ema | Vanderrg | Outlook - Installation | 4 | April 9th 08 09:23 PM |
Can't send Gmail from within Outlook 2007 - Vista Business | Tone Southerland | Outlook - Installation | 5 | April 30th 07 03:10 AM |
can't send/receive mail in vista w/ outlook 2000 | frosty1 | Outlook - Installation | 1 | April 17th 07 02:11 AM |
Outlook 2007 Cannot send nor receive. Pls Help! | Luis | Outlook - Installation | 0 | April 9th 07 11:08 AM |
Can't Send and Receive in Outlook 2007 | Jim B | Outlook - Installation | 2 | June 3rd 06 06:41 PM |