![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In summary, I can have no preview with the custom form, or preview with the
regular form. This isn't ideal. That's all you get unless you move to Outlook 2007 or use a third-party tool (http://www.add-in-express.com/outlook-extension/). -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Geoff" wrote in message ... Many thanks for your reply and continued support. When you designed the form, did you click the Edit Read Layout button and create a read layout showing your custom fields? I thought that I had. But to confirm, I have opened my custom form in design view and I have clicked the "Edit Read Page" and "Edit Compose Page" buttons. The layout is the same on both pages. Therefore, I have composed a new custom form with same user-defined fields and with different layouts for the compose and read pages. This is how a Post Item behaves when it's created with the new custom form - when there is, and isn't, a registry string value for the new custom form in: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\O utlook\Custom Forms\Preview 1. Without a registry string value, the Post Item did not display in the Preview Pane because of its "active content". When the Post Item was opened, it displayed in the "Read" page layout of the new custom form. When I then opened the Edit menu and selected Revise Contents, it displayed in the "Compose" page layout of the custom form. 2. With a registry string value, the Post Item did display in the Preview Pane. However, when the Post item was opened, it displayed in the regular Post Item form. And when I then opened the Edit menu and selected Revise Contents, it continued to be displayed in the regular Post item form. In summary, I can have no preview with the custom form, or preview with the regular form. This isn't ideal. If there is a way round this, that'd be good. Otherwise, do you think this behaviour is isolated to Outlook 2002? I'm wondering if, when I distribute the pst file containing the post items (which is a repository of archive information), I shall need to write a program to edit the registry on user machines. I'd rather not. I'd prefer an easier way forward. That's exactly what you'd see if the item used the regular Post form. That's the way it's designed to work. I thought that must be the case. If you have any further thoughts, they'd be very welcome. Best regards Geoff "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... After posting the Post Item, only the Subject and Bodytext fields appeared in the Preview Pane. (It would be nice if the other fields appeared too, but it's not the end of the world because the custom fields can be still be seen in the list of Post Items above the Preview Pane.) That's exactly what you'd see if the item used the regular Post form. That's the way it's designed to work. What's of more concern is that when I now open the custom Post Item, it shows in the regular Post Item form. Also, if I then open the Edit menu and select Revise Contents, it remains in the regular Post Item form. This means the user does not have access to the custom fields, should they need to be revised. When you designed the form, did you click the Edit Read Layout button and create a read layout showing your custom fields? -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very many thanks for seeing me through this.
On reflection after my last post, I felt that the registry fix wasn't appropriate. In effect, it seems the registry fix overrides the Post Item's MessageClass property (if that has been set to display the Post Item in a custom form) so that the Post Item displays in the regular form. The (rhetorical) question then arises, why bother to set the MessageClass property in the first place? Many thanks for helping me see the trade-offs in Outlook 2002 and for the tip about Outlook 2007. Incidentally, your "Jumpstart" book has been a great help in the past. I have long since adopted your convention of the "obj" prefix in all my Access coding. It is so sensible from a number of points of view. Many thanks again - over and out! Best regards Geoff "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... In summary, I can have no preview with the custom form, or preview with the regular form. This isn't ideal. That's all you get unless you move to Outlook 2007 or use a third-party tool (http://www.add-in-express.com/outlook-extension/). -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Geoff" wrote in message ... Many thanks for your reply and continued support. When you designed the form, did you click the Edit Read Layout button and create a read layout showing your custom fields? I thought that I had. But to confirm, I have opened my custom form in design view and I have clicked the "Edit Read Page" and "Edit Compose Page" buttons. The layout is the same on both pages. Therefore, I have composed a new custom form with same user-defined fields and with different layouts for the compose and read pages. This is how a Post Item behaves when it's created with the new custom form - when there is, and isn't, a registry string value for the new custom form in: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\O utlook\Custom Forms\Preview 1. Without a registry string value, the Post Item did not display in the Preview Pane because of its "active content". When the Post Item was opened, it displayed in the "Read" page layout of the new custom form. When I then opened the Edit menu and selected Revise Contents, it displayed in the "Compose" page layout of the custom form. 2. With a registry string value, the Post Item did display in the Preview Pane. However, when the Post item was opened, it displayed in the regular Post Item form. And when I then opened the Edit menu and selected Revise Contents, it continued to be displayed in the regular Post item form. In summary, I can have no preview with the custom form, or preview with the regular form. This isn't ideal. If there is a way round this, that'd be good. Otherwise, do you think this behaviour is isolated to Outlook 2002? I'm wondering if, when I distribute the pst file containing the post items (which is a repository of archive information), I shall need to write a program to edit the registry on user machines. I'd rather not. I'd prefer an easier way forward. That's exactly what you'd see if the item used the regular Post form. That's the way it's designed to work. I thought that must be the case. If you have any further thoughts, they'd be very welcome. Best regards Geoff "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... After posting the Post Item, only the Subject and Bodytext fields appeared in the Preview Pane. (It would be nice if the other fields appeared too, but it's not the end of the world because the custom fields can be still be seen in the list of Post Items above the Preview Pane.) That's exactly what you'd see if the item used the regular Post form. That's the way it's designed to work. What's of more concern is that when I now open the custom Post Item, it shows in the regular Post Item form. Also, if I then open the Edit menu and select Revise Contents, it remains in the regular Post Item form. This means the user does not have access to the custom fields, should they need to be revised. When you designed the form, did you click the Edit Read Layout button and create a read layout showing your custom fields? -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think the registry fix has anything to do with the message class. It just allows custom forms to show in the preview pane.
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Geoff" wrote in message ... Very many thanks for seeing me through this. On reflection after my last post, I felt that the registry fix wasn't appropriate. In effect, it seems the registry fix overrides the Post Item's MessageClass property (if that has been set to display the Post Item in a custom form) so that the Post Item displays in the regular form. The (rhetorical) question then arises, why bother to set the MessageClass property in the first place? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought the behaviour I experienced (described in two posts back) seemed
to indicate that the registry fix did more than just allow the custom form to display in the Preview Pane. When the registry fix was in place, the Post Item that would otherwise display in the custom form did then display in the Preview Pane, but it also reverted to opening in the regular Post Item form (when it was opened) and, perhaps as might be expected, in the regular Post Item form when then being revised. In other words, the registry fix seemed to be having the effect of saying, if an item is supposed to be opened and revised in the custom form, then override that setting and preview, open and revise it in the regular form instead - ie the registry fix does not just cause the Post Item to be displayed it in the Preview Pane. I interpreted that as meaning that the registry fix was overriding the MessageClass property since that property (as I understand it) forces the Post Item to be opened and revised in the custom form. This does seem odd because the registry fix implies it would only affect the preview behaviour (since the new string value is in the Preview key). In one sense, it doesn't matter too much because (as I understand it) whichever route I take, I cannot get the behaviour I want from Outlook 2002 - which is to be able to preview, open and edit a Post Item using a custom form. Best regards Geoff "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I don't think the registry fix has anything to do with the message class. It just allows custom forms to show in the preview pane. -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Geoff" wrote in message ... Very many thanks for seeing me through this. On reflection after my last post, I felt that the registry fix wasn't appropriate. In effect, it seems the registry fix overrides the Post Item's MessageClass property (if that has been set to display the Post Item in a custom form) so that the Post Item displays in the regular form. The (rhetorical) question then arises, why bother to set the MessageClass property in the first place? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Set MailItem.Sender Property | Joshua Ellul | Add-ins for Outlook | 2 | June 8th 06 07:30 PM |
A custom icon for my custom MessageClass | joan | Outlook - Using Forms | 0 | March 27th 06 10:23 AM |
Detect the marked for deletion property | [email protected] | Outlook and VBA | 0 | March 16th 06 12:28 AM |
Send As Property Outlook VBA | [email protected] | Outlook and VBA | 1 | March 15th 06 05:12 PM |
How to validate a Custom Property Page | Jack Zhang | Add-ins for Outlook | 1 | February 9th 06 08:22 PM |