![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a group of 4 Outlook::OlkOptionButton's that I want to make tri-state.
By tri-state I mean I want the user to be able to select either 0 or 1 of the 4 buttons. If he clicks on a button that is already set, it should turn off the button and then 0 of the buttons would be selected. Is that possible? Do I need to use a different button type? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are no buttons like that. If you click an option that's already
clicked it remains clicked. You'd have to simulate that with a set of regular buttons or checkboxes. Of course the shapes are different. -- Ken Slovak [MVP - Outlook] http://www.slovaktech.com Author: Professional Programming Outlook 2007. Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options. http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm "John Erickson" wrote in message ... I have a group of 4 Outlook::OlkOptionButton's that I want to make tri-state. By tri-state I mean I want the user to be able to select either 0 or 1 of the 4 buttons. If he clicks on a button that is already set, it should turn off the button and then 0 of the buttons would be selected. Is that possible? Do I need to use a different button type? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Ken. I think I figured out another way around that problem. I haven't
implemented it yet, but I think it will work. Instead of making all 4 option buttons part of the same group I can leave them stand-alone or make them part 4 seperate groups. Then I would have total control over which ones are selected and which ones aren't programatically. "Ken Slovak - [MVP - Outlook]" wrote: There are no buttons like that. If you click an option that's already clicked it remains clicked. You'd have to simulate that with a set of regular buttons or checkboxes. Of course the shapes are different. -- Ken Slovak [MVP - Outlook] http://www.slovaktech.com Author: Professional Programming Outlook 2007. Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options. http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm "John Erickson" wrote in message ... I have a group of 4 Outlook::OlkOptionButton's that I want to make tri-state. By tri-state I mean I want the user to be able to select either 0 or 1 of the 4 buttons. If he clicks on a button that is already set, it should turn off the button and then 0 of the buttons would be selected. Is that possible? Do I need to use a different button type? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You would need to set each individual option in a frame or some container
that keeps each separate. In general all options not encapsulated within a container such as a frame are treated as part of the same linked group. -- Ken Slovak [MVP - Outlook] http://www.slovaktech.com Author: Professional Programming Outlook 2007. Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options. http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm "John Erickson" wrote in message ... Thanks Ken. I think I figured out another way around that problem. I haven't implemented it yet, but I think it will work. Instead of making all 4 option buttons part of the same group I can leave them stand-alone or make them part 4 seperate groups. Then I would have total control over which ones are selected and which ones aren't programatically. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outlook Question | Carl | Outlook - General Queries | 5 | February 25th 09 01:08 PM |
Question about outlook | kesava | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | September 23rd 08 06:55 PM |
Outlook question | blueskymark | Outlook - Using Contacts | 2 | August 21st 08 04:45 PM |
Outlook//OE question | Jon | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | May 7th 06 01:25 AM |
Outlook PST question | Bazwaz | Outlook - General Queries | 6 | April 13th 06 07:37 PM |