![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I'm an old codger who used to use Appleworks (the one that ran on ProDOS on the //e) and then Sidekick (no, the old TSR that ran under DOS) and then Lotus Organizer for keeping track of appointments and tasks. I find it interesting that Outlook, with all of its bells and whistles, gives me just three choices of priority and a due date with which to sort my blooming tasks. Not sufficient. I've been using it a couple of years now and just switched from Office Pro 2003 on WinXP to Office Pro 2007 on Vista Business. Still just 3 priority levels and a due date. I did a search for the terms "tasks" and "priorities" here and found an enigmatic statement by Milly Staples back in April of 2006 to someone who had much the same complaint that he would be interested in upgrading to Outlook 2007 when it became available. Am I missing something, Milly? Anybody? Somebody throw me a bone here! I can't believe that every previous personal information organizer I've ever used is superior to Outlook in this regard! I'm guessing the answer, if there is one, is going to somehow involve OneNote. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The main thing you're probably missing is that unsorted task views, like SImple List and Active Tasks, allow you to drag items up and down to rearrange them. So does the new To Do Bar.
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "jimmuh" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm an old codger who used to use Appleworks (the one that ran on ProDOS on the //e) and then Sidekick (no, the old TSR that ran under DOS) and then Lotus Organizer for keeping track of appointments and tasks. I find it interesting that Outlook, with all of its bells and whistles, gives me just three choices of priority and a due date with which to sort my blooming tasks. Not sufficient. I've been using it a couple of years now and just switched from Office Pro 2003 on WinXP to Office Pro 2007 on Vista Business. Still just 3 priority levels and a due date. I did a search for the terms "tasks" and "priorities" here and found an enigmatic statement by Milly Staples back in April of 2006 to someone who had much the same complaint that he would be interested in upgrading to Outlook 2007 when it became available. Am I missing something, Milly? Anybody? Somebody throw me a bone here! I can't believe that every previous personal information organizer I've ever used is superior to Outlook in this regard! I'm guessing the answer, if there is one, is going to somehow involve OneNote. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, I had noticed those features, but they didn't seem to do just what
I had in mind. I was thinking that I needed to actually be able to assign numeric priorities to do what I wanted. I'll re-examine them to see if I can get them to show me what I want in the type of view I want. For some reason I seemed to be unable to compose a useable view which shows appointments and tasks, with sufficient information from both to be useful. I thought I also found that the order I created by dragging and dropping wasn't "sticky". But I'll hammer away at it for a while and see if I can come up with something that works. Thank you for the reminder. "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: The main thing you're probably missing is that unsorted task views, like SImple List and Active Tasks, allow you to drag items up and down to rearrange them. So does the new To Do Bar. -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "jimmuh" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm an old codger who used to use Appleworks (the one that ran on ProDOS on the //e) and then Sidekick (no, the old TSR that ran under DOS) and then Lotus Organizer for keeping track of appointments and tasks. I find it interesting that Outlook, with all of its bells and whistles, gives me just three choices of priority and a due date with which to sort my blooming tasks. Not sufficient. I've been using it a couple of years now and just switched from Office Pro 2003 on WinXP to Office Pro 2007 on Vista Business. Still just 3 priority levels and a due date. I did a search for the terms "tasks" and "priorities" here and found an enigmatic statement by Milly Staples back in April of 2006 to someone who had much the same complaint that he would be interested in upgrading to Outlook 2007 when it became available. Am I missing something, Milly? Anybody? Somebody throw me a bone here! I can't believe that every previous personal information organizer I've ever used is superior to Outlook in this regard! I'm guessing the answer, if there is one, is going to somehow involve OneNote. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Suggestions | John7100 | Outlook - Calandaring | 6 | November 6th 06 06:45 AM |
I need help getting OE to open - I've tried the other suggestions. | Marc | Outlook Express | 3 | August 21st 06 02:29 PM |
Software suggestions? | [email protected] | Outlook - Calandaring | 1 | July 21st 06 04:48 PM |
Need suggestions on folders | P D Sterling | Outlook Express | 8 | February 10th 06 07:56 PM |
Is it possible to make custom priorities for Outlook tasks? | dim4x4 | Outlook and VBA | 3 | February 10th 06 07:11 AM |