![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. When "accepting" a meeting, it should update the organizer's calendar
without having to "send" the response which just adds more unneccessary email. There should just be an option of whether or not to accept/decline with a response. 2. When editting a response to a meeting, put "RE" in the beginning of the subject line. This will differentiate between those who just accepted and those who accepted with a response if you are not going to just update the calendar with an accept or a decline without receiving an email in the inbox (see #1) ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm....calendari ng |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If responding to a meeting outside of the same organization from which the
meeting was generated, how would the meeting organizer "know" that someone has accepted/declined/tentatively accepted? What method would be used for that scenario???? How would someone "know" that you have accepted, declined or posted a tentative without you sending a response? Is Outlook supposed to use a crystal ball?? As for the second suggestion, whenever a person accepts the meeting but has comments, it will not automatically process but remain in the in-box (unless you have rules that move messages with the specific criteria) so you can easily open them and read any responses. IMHO, you are asking for added complexity without a commensurate return. -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After furious head scratching, PandaF86 asked: | 1. When "accepting" a meeting, it should update the organizer's | calendar without having to "send" the response which just adds more | unneccessary email. There should just be an option of whether or not | to accept/decline with a response. | 2. When editting a response to a meeting, put "RE" in the beginning | of the subject line. This will differentiate between those who just | accepted and those who accepted with a response if you are not going | to just update the calendar with an accept or a decline without | receiving an email in the inbox (see #1) | | ---------------- | This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the | suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click | the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the | button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft | Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. | | http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm....calendari ng |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outlook meeting requests organizer | Ivo Almeida | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | January 26th 06 05:44 PM |
Outlook meeting requests | Ivo Almeida | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | January 26th 06 05:42 PM |
Accepting Outlook meeting requests | ATCenv | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | January 26th 06 01:40 PM |
Add post-meeting managment features to an Outlook meeting | Matt Osminer | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | January 25th 06 06:53 PM |
2003 Outlook Meeting Request | Alicia Rittenhouse | Outlook - Calandaring | 1 | January 24th 06 01:53 AM |