![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian,
Thanks for your comment, I too, do not use categories, but the fact that they are there has never been a problem. In fact I had never even looked at that feature/property until one of the people I support started having issues, caused by a marginally, at best, advertised change by MS for no good reason. So here is the way I see it, unless you actually use the "category" feature for sorting, viewing ect, it is invisible so leaving it alone would NOT impact ANYONE ever, nor prevent you from changing it to a category of your choice, but making this change DOES affect everyone who uses this feature in the manor my user was, (Look around, you'll find a LOT of people use it for similar reasons and in similar ways to my user.) Bottom line is, use them or not as to your liking, but since they ARE, in effect, invisible to the NON USER, why make such a change which will SCREW up those who do. It just does not make good since, instead if it is such a problem, why not just provide the rule and leave it unchecked, with EASY, (I know not a word in MS vocabulary) to find info on their knowledge base, newsgroups etc that it is there. If it had been the rule from day one then everyone, by now, who uses the feature would know to adjust that rule as needed, but to make such a major change for such a minor thing without good compelling reason, is just plain not good engineering. It certainly would not have gone over well with any of my professors when I was going to college getting my engineering degree. Ralph Malph "Brian Tillman" wrote: Ralph Malph wrote: Thank you for the quick reply. It seems you have identified the source of our problem...Typical Microsoft Stupidity...LOL what is wrong with those guys. Why on earth would one EVER come up with such a stupid idea as to remove that item. In fact why even have a "Category" field if you are just going to strip the info right out of the e-mail. Don't you sometimes just want to slap these people upside the head and see if there is anything up there? I believe the decision to be a good one. I do not care what categories you have chosen for yourself and I certainly don't want them on appointments that I receive. If I want a category on them, I'll put one of my own choosing on them. Kudos for Microsoft for providing this functionality. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Changing the "Category" property on an Outlook.Appointment Item | morna | Add-ins for Outlook | 0 | April 4th 08 06:21 PM |
"active appointment" view in calendar. darken grid lines?? | lp the cvb lady | Outlook - Calandaring | 1 | December 3rd 07 08:17 AM |
Outlook 2007 recurring appointment error "Cannot open this item" | Kat Barnes | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | October 22nd 07 09:42 PM |
reusable appointment "note" that I entered it on bosses calendar | ronda | Outlook - Calandaring | 1 | March 15th 07 03:02 PM |
How to print appointment times in "Weekly" or "Monthly" print styles? | Alan | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | September 27th 06 07:47 AM |