![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have some users of Outlook 2003 that we are seeing something rather
disturbing. These users are keeping track of their employees locations for the day in the calendar and let's say there are 15 of them. Upon converting him to Outlook 2003 with Cached mode there were only 10 visible. Changing the configuration to NOT use Cached mode all 15 are again visible. The OST file has been deleted and allowed to rebuild but the same issue comes up again. Anyone have a good idea as to how and/or why this is happening? Dave French |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Visible where?
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... I have some users of Outlook 2003 that we are seeing something rather disturbing. These users are keeping track of their employees locations for the day in the calendar and let's say there are 15 of them. Upon converting him to Outlook 2003 with Cached mode there were only 10 visible. Changing the configuration to NOT use Cached mode all 15 are again visible. The OST file has been deleted and allowed to rebuild but the same issue comes up again. Anyone have a good idea as to how and/or why this is happening? Dave French |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the Day/Month view.
Day specifically. Also, changing to the Recurring Appts. view in the cached mode shows all entries. Also one of the administrators shared the calendar and he opened the shared calendar and all entries were visible in the identical views...but NOT on the user's own calendar view. Dave "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... Visible where? -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... I have some users of Outlook 2003 that we are seeing something rather disturbing. These users are keeping track of their employees locations for the day in the calendar and let's say there are 15 of them. Upon converting him to Outlook 2003 with Cached mode there were only 10 visible. Changing the configuration to NOT use Cached mode all 15 are again visible. The OST file has been deleted and allowed to rebuild but the same issue comes up again. Anyone have a good idea as to how and/or why this is happening? Dave French |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not clear on whether the problem is in the user viewing their own mailbox Calendar folder, some other user's mailbox folder, or in some consolidated public folder calendar.
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... In the Day/Month view. Day specifically. Also, changing to the Recurring Appts. view in the cached mode shows all entries. Also one of the administrators shared the calendar and he opened the shared calendar and all entries were visible in the identical views...but NOT on the user's own calendar view. Dave "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... Visible where? "David French" wrote in message ... I have some users of Outlook 2003 that we are seeing something rather disturbing. These users are keeping track of their employees locations for the day in the calendar and let's say there are 15 of them. Upon converting him to Outlook 2003 with Cached mode there were only 10 visible. Changing the configuration to NOT use Cached mode all 15 are again visible. The OST file has been deleted and allowed to rebuild but the same issue comes up again. Anyone have a good idea as to how and/or why this is happening? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob's Exchange Server Calendar is the issue.
We are on Exchange 2003 and Bob was happy before Outlook 2003 was installed. He would click on his calendar, see all his entries, open and edit them, etc. Bob's computer was updated to Outlook 2003 and the hiding of certain events started to occur. Mark is the network admin working on the problem. Mark remote controlled Bob's computer to do the update (nothing new here). Bob called to say he couldn't see all of his entries. Being the owner of the calendar we are all very confused as to why this is happening. If the Cached Mode is turned off, all of Bob's events are visible. Even deleting and having the OST file recreate itself does not solve the issue. I hope this clarifies the questions. Dave French "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I'm not clear on whether the problem is in the user viewing their own mailbox Calendar folder, some other user's mailbox folder, or in some consolidated public folder calendar. -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... In the Day/Month view. Day specifically. Also, changing to the Recurring Appts. view in the cached mode shows all entries. Also one of the administrators shared the calendar and he opened the shared calendar and all entries were visible in the identical views...but NOT on the user's own calendar view. Dave "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... Visible where? "David French" wrote in message ... I have some users of Outlook 2003 that we are seeing something rather disturbing. These users are keeping track of their employees locations for the day in the calendar and let's say there are 15 of them. Upon converting him to Outlook 2003 with Cached mode there were only 10 visible. Changing the configuration to NOT use Cached mode all 15 are again visible. The OST file has been deleted and allowed to rebuild but the same issue comes up again. Anyone have a good idea as to how and/or why this is happening? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The symptoms suggest that a filtered view might be in place showing only some of Bob's items in the day/week/month view, but with an unfiltered view in the Recurring Appointments shows them all.
Are the missing entries all recurring appointments? -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... Bob's Exchange Server Calendar is the issue. We are on Exchange 2003 and Bob was happy before Outlook 2003 was installed. He would click on his calendar, see all his entries, open and edit them, etc. Bob's computer was updated to Outlook 2003 and the hiding of certain events started to occur. Mark is the network admin working on the problem. Mark remote controlled Bob's computer to do the update (nothing new here). Bob called to say he couldn't see all of his entries. Being the owner of the calendar we are all very confused as to why this is happening. If the Cached Mode is turned off, all of Bob's events are visible. Even deleting and having the OST file recreate itself does not solve the issue. I hope this clarifies the questions. Dave French "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I'm not clear on whether the problem is in the user viewing their own mailbox Calendar folder, some other user's mailbox folder, or in some consolidated public folder calendar. -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... In the Day/Month view. Day specifically. Also, changing to the Recurring Appts. view in the cached mode shows all entries. Also one of the administrators shared the calendar and he opened the shared calendar and all entries were visible in the identical views...but NOT on the user's own calendar view. Dave "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... Visible where? "David French" wrote in message ... I have some users of Outlook 2003 that we are seeing something rather disturbing. These users are keeping track of their employees locations for the day in the calendar and let's say there are 15 of them. Upon converting him to Outlook 2003 with Cached mode there were only 10 visible. Changing the configuration to NOT use Cached mode all 15 are again visible. The OST file has been deleted and allowed to rebuild but the same issue comes up again. Anyone have a good idea as to how and/or why this is happening? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sue,
Yes, these are all recurring appointments. So from what you are suggesting there may have been 'adjustments' in the view parameters that appear to be excluding certain events, am I on the right track? Dave "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... The symptoms suggest that a filtered view might be in place showing only some of Bob's items in the day/week/month view, but with an unfiltered view in the Recurring Appointments shows them all. Are the missing entries all recurring appointments? -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... Bob's Exchange Server Calendar is the issue. We are on Exchange 2003 and Bob was happy before Outlook 2003 was installed. He would click on his calendar, see all his entries, open and edit them, etc. Bob's computer was updated to Outlook 2003 and the hiding of certain events started to occur. Mark is the network admin working on the problem. Mark remote controlled Bob's computer to do the update (nothing new here). Bob called to say he couldn't see all of his entries. Being the owner of the calendar we are all very confused as to why this is happening. If the Cached Mode is turned off, all of Bob's events are visible. Even deleting and having the OST file recreate itself does not solve the issue. I hope this clarifies the questions. Dave French "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I'm not clear on whether the problem is in the user viewing their own mailbox Calendar folder, some other user's mailbox folder, or in some consolidated public folder calendar. -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... In the Day/Month view. Day specifically. Also, changing to the Recurring Appts. view in the cached mode shows all entries. Also one of the administrators shared the calendar and he opened the shared calendar and all entries were visible in the identical views...but NOT on the user's own calendar view. Dave "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... Visible where? "David French" wrote in message ... I have some users of Outlook 2003 that we are seeing something rather disturbing. These users are keeping track of their employees locations for the day in the calendar and let's say there are 15 of them. Upon converting him to Outlook 2003 with Cached mode there were only 10 visible. Changing the configuration to NOT use Cached mode all 15 are again visible. The OST file has been deleted and allowed to rebuild but the same issue comes up again. Anyone have a good idea as to how and/or why this is happening? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's certainly where I'd be looking -- at the Filter for the problem view.
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... Sue, Yes, these are all recurring appointments. So from what you are suggesting there may have been 'adjustments' in the view parameters that appear to be excluding certain events, am I on the right track? Dave "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... The symptoms suggest that a filtered view might be in place showing only some of Bob's items in the day/week/month view, but with an unfiltered view in the Recurring Appointments shows them all. Are the missing entries all recurring appointments? "David French" wrote in message ... Bob's Exchange Server Calendar is the issue. We are on Exchange 2003 and Bob was happy before Outlook 2003 was installed. He would click on his calendar, see all his entries, open and edit them, etc. Bob's computer was updated to Outlook 2003 and the hiding of certain events started to occur. Mark is the network admin working on the problem. Mark remote controlled Bob's computer to do the update (nothing new here). Bob called to say he couldn't see all of his entries. Being the owner of the calendar we are all very confused as to why this is happening. If the Cached Mode is turned off, all of Bob's events are visible. Even deleting and having the OST file recreate itself does not solve the issue. I hope this clarifies the questions. Dave French "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I'm not clear on whether the problem is in the user viewing their own mailbox Calendar folder, some other user's mailbox folder, or in some consolidated public folder calendar. -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "David French" wrote in message ... In the Day/Month view. Day specifically. Also, changing to the Recurring Appts. view in the cached mode shows all entries. Also one of the administrators shared the calendar and he opened the shared calendar and all entries were visible in the identical views...but NOT on the user's own calendar view. Dave "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... Visible where? "David French" wrote in message ... I have some users of Outlook 2003 that we are seeing something rather disturbing. These users are keeping track of their employees locations for the day in the calendar and let's say there are 15 of them. Upon converting him to Outlook 2003 with Cached mode there were only 10 visible. Changing the configuration to NOT use Cached mode all 15 are again visible. The OST file has been deleted and allowed to rebuild but the same issue comes up again. Anyone have a good idea as to how and/or why this is happening? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Being one of the people who had experienced similar problems
(without any filter being applied - at least not visibly), here's an update of my latest interactions with our IT support: After several sessions with the usual /cleanfreebusy, /resetfolders, /cleanviews etc, creating a new profile in cached and non-cached mode, which all did not correct the problem, but at least went deeper and deeper (or rather higher up the 'expert escalation'), I finally was connected to an expert who had a very clear idea what caused the problem: He assumed that my views.dat was corrupted, so wanted to delete it and have outlook recreate it. Bad luck, though - the only views.dat on my computer is the mailViews.dat from Thunderbird. That completely threw him off track, so he closed the netmeeting and the phone call and went home for further investigations, mumbling something about 'possibly have to repair or re-install', and he wasn't heard of for some hours. Next time he called he searched for views.dat again and still couldn't find it. Then he didn't call back. That was on Friday. Today I got a mail stating my case (which apparently was one of many similar cases) was closed as resolved. According to the infomrmation in the mail the problem had been caused by a change in the service account on the exchange server from NT4 to Active Directory. Now don't ask me what this means, and why it shoudl cause such an obscure problem - what I know is that my hidden appointment was still hidden, so I deleted and re-created it. Now it's visible also in the day view; let's see how long it will take until it disappears again ;-) What I don't understand, though: where - if not in views.dat - are my views stored? I have created new views, and they are surviving outlook sessions ... (And yes, I'm also looking for hidden files;-) ///Walter Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] wrote: That's certainly where I'd be looking -- at the Filter for the problem view. "David French" wrote in message ... Sue, Yes, these are all recurring appointments. So from what you are suggesting there may have been 'adjustments' in the view parameters that appear to be excluding certain events, am I on the right track? Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Views.dat isn't used at all in Outlook 2003. In earlier versions, it was used to hold information about views of system folders, not Outlook folders.
Views for Outlook folders are stored in your Outlook data store. The /cleanviews switch removes all such view customizations. -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Walter P. Zaehl" wrote in message ... Being one of the people who had experienced similar problems (without any filter being applied - at least not visibly), here's an update of my latest interactions with our IT support: After several sessions with the usual /cleanfreebusy, /resetfolders, /cleanviews etc, creating a new profile in cached and non-cached mode, which all did not correct the problem, but at least went deeper and deeper (or rather higher up the 'expert escalation'), I finally was connected to an expert who had a very clear idea what caused the problem: He assumed that my views.dat was corrupted, so wanted to delete it and have outlook recreate it. Bad luck, though - the only views.dat on my computer is the mailViews.dat from Thunderbird. That completely threw him off track, so he closed the netmeeting and the phone call and went home for further investigations, mumbling something about 'possibly have to repair or re-install', and he wasn't heard of for some hours. Next time he called he searched for views.dat again and still couldn't find it. Then he didn't call back. That was on Friday. Today I got a mail stating my case (which apparently was one of many similar cases) was closed as resolved. According to the infomrmation in the mail the problem had been caused by a change in the service account on the exchange server from NT4 to Active Directory. Now don't ask me what this means, and why it shoudl cause such an obscure problem - what I know is that my hidden appointment was still hidden, so I deleted and re-created it. Now it's visible also in the day view; let's see how long it will take until it disappears again ;-) What I don't understand, though: where - if not in views.dat - are my views stored? I have created new views, and they are surviving outlook sessions ... (And yes, I'm also looking for hidden files;-) ///Walter Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] wrote: That's certainly where I'd be looking -- at the Filter for the problem view. "David French" wrote in message ... Sue, Yes, these are all recurring appointments. So from what you are suggesting there may have been 'adjustments' in the view parameters that appear to be excluding certain events, am I on the right track? Dave |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outlk 2003 Cache & Forms | LeoBloom | Outlook - Installation | 2 | March 8th 06 04:24 PM |
Form cache corruption | [email protected] | Outlook - Using Forms | 0 | March 3rd 06 10:33 PM |
cache temp file | Joel Allen | Outlook - Using Forms | 0 | February 23rd 06 08:17 PM |
Forms Cache Nightmare | Vaughan | Outlook - Using Forms | 11 | February 22nd 06 03:25 PM |
Form Cache | Joel Allen | Outlook - Using Forms | 9 | February 15th 06 07:55 PM |