My OLE will not allow me to create anymore folders....is there a limit to
the number of folders one can set up....is there a solution to expanding the
folders capabilities?
Thanks.
Jim

"jem1945" schreef in bericht
...
My OLE will not allow me to create anymore folders....is there a limit to
the number of folders one can set up....is there a solution to expanding
the folders capabilities?
Thanks.
Jim

"wierd" schreef in bericht
...

"jem1945" schreef in bericht
...
My OLE will not allow me to create anymore folders....is there a limit to
the number of folders one can set up....is there a solution to expanding
the folders capabilities?
Thanks.
Jim

You may have a damaged identity especially if it is the default Main
Identity. File | Identity | Add New Identity. Create a new one and test it.
If all is well, you can import your messages and Address Book from the old
identity and delete it.

How to Create and Use Identities in Outlook Express
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=209169
--
Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP Outlook Express
~IB-CA~

"jem1945" wrote in message
...
My OLE will not allow me to create anymore folders....is there a limit to
the number of folders one can set up....is there a solution to expanding
the folders capabilities?
Thanks.
Jim

I had this exact same problem several months back. You may remember Bruce,
that was on of my problems you were trying to help me with. Shutting down
and rebooting did not fix the problem, nor did closing OE and reopening it.
It was very weird, but later in the day, I simply opened OE and tried
creating a new folder and it worked again. I originally thought there might
be some limit too. I do think I may have compacted all the folders before
trying to create a new one again, but not positive. I would try going thru
the folder compacting procedure and try creating a new folder afterwards.
If not, perhaps just leave it a while and try creating a folder again later
or tomorrow, a reboot first couldn't hurt either. I am no expert or MVP,
but I'm passing this on from my experience, as I spent a great deal of time
on this same problem and it seemed to start working again on its own
without me doing anything specific to fix it, so I'd hate to see you waste
a great deal of time also. Otherwise, follow Bruce's advice to create a new
identity

PS. if this is your real email address ) you should change it
to something like @invalid.net for use on these newsgroups or you can expect
to be bombarded by spam forever. I learned that the hard way too

Good Luck,
D.



"jem1945" wrote in message
...
My OLE will not allow me to create anymore folders....is there a limit to
the number of folders one can set up....is there a solution to expanding
the folders capabilities?
Thanks.
Jim

Dan wrote:
I had this exact same problem several months back.

You are replying to a post from 4th November, that already recieved good
advice.

PS. if this is your real email address ) you should
change it to something like @invalid.net for use on these newsgroups
or you can expect to be bombarded by spam forever. I learned that the
hard way too

Do NOT change it to @invalid.net

invalid.net is a valid domain, all email sent to this address will get sent
and spam their inbox.

You must be careful what you choose for after the @

In this case would be ok or


Or leave out the "dot.com" altogether.

--
Kath Adams
MS MVP - Windows (Outlook Express)

"Kath Adams" wrote in message

....

You must be careful what you choose for after the @

In this case would be ok or




Kath,

"ok" for what purpose? Do you realize that these parenthesized strings
are "comments"? Hence, they may *look* as if they are unusable
but in fact they may work no differently than their uncommented versions.

Ah. I think I know where you may be getting that idea.

Repost of my comments to Roland in July:

paste
For another example of what I think must be flawed advice see

http://support.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.aspx

"Use a modified E-mail address"

which apparently suggests (only) putting "munging" in parentheses...

After finding out about "comments" I suspect the examples
are in fact valid and wouldn't have any preventive value at all: ; o

ref
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html

quote
A.5. White space, comments, and other oddities
/quote
/ref


FYI

Robert
---
/paste

Robert Aldwinckle wrote:
"Kath Adams" wrote in message

...

You must be careful what you choose for after the @

In this case would be ok or




Kath,

"ok" for what purpose? Do you realize that these parenthesized
strings are "comments"? Hence, they may *look* as if they are
unusable but in fact they may work no differently than their uncommented
versions.
Ah. I think I know where you may be getting that idea.

Repost of my comments to Roland in July:

paste
For another example of what I think must be flawed advice see

http://support.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.aspx

"Use a modified E-mail address"

which apparently suggests (only) putting "munging" in parentheses...

After finding out about "comments" I suspect the examples
are in fact valid and wouldn't have any preventive value at all: ; o
ref
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html

quote
A.5. White space, comments, and other oddities
/quote
/ref


FYI

Robert
---
/paste

Robert,
It's always worked ok for me? For example :-

The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by
the server. The rejected e-mail address was '.
Subject 'test', Account: 'mail.mvps.org', Server: 'mail.mvps.org', Protocol:
SMTP, Server Response: '501 5.5.2 Syntax error in address
', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 501,
Error Number: 0x800CCC79
--
Kath Adams
MS MVP - Windows (Outlook Express)

"Kath Adams" wrote in message

....

Robert,
It's always worked ok for me? For example :-

The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by
the server. The rejected e-mail address was '.
Subject 'test', Account: 'mail.mvps.org', Server: 'mail.mvps.org', Protocol:
SMTP, Server Response: '501 5.5.2 Syntax error in address
', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 501,
Error Number: 0x800CCC79


I guess that server doesn't implement that part of the RFC then.

OTOH I'm not even clear about how widely implemented RFC2822
is or should be.

It was mostly an ironic comment about its implications for some kinds
of antispamming techniques.



Robert
---