![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan" wrote in message ... So let's see he I purchase and use a product from Microsoft, and it is NOT their responsibility to provide me with proper instructions on how to use it??! And as it is their product (OE) that I used to set up a newsgroup account on worse yet, THEIR network! (msnews,microsoft.com) yet you still contend they had no responsibility to provide PROPER instructions through the help files??! Even though it is their setup protocol written into the program? I have no control over how they write their programs, so I have no control over how they have arranged the setup protocol, which tricks users into entering their email address, which I'm sure you must agree is totally unnecessary to participate here. And who exactly is responsible to advise me in setting up my newsgroup account on THEIR program, on THEIR network????????? Am I supposed to be born with that knowledge?? I simply followed the instructions included in the program. THEY (MS) omitted the fact I should enter a false address to avoid it going public. You wrote, "it is your opinion that Microsoft should supply this" well, its THEIR program, on THEIR network, so who exactly do you propose should supply this?????????????????????? You didn't point me in the direction of where I was supposed to find this supposedly so common knowledge of SAFELY setting up a newsgroup account when doing so, so I must assume that it is your opinion that everyone must be born with this great knowledge as you were, I guess. NOTHING changes the fact that the setup protocol in THEIR program should not even ask for the user to enter an email address if it is not necessary for participation here!! Let alone for them to make it public without EXPLICIT warning FIRST, AND WITHOUT EXPLICIT PERMISSION!! From the research I have done since, it seems that these newsgroups are responsible for a HUGE percentage of the spam, viruses, trojans and worms out there, due to this practice of tricking users into entering an unnecessary email address instead of a simple user name. If MS was serious about wanting to stamp out these threats, they would make the necessary changes. It does seem they want to get big in the security software industry now, doesn't it!? This IS my opinion, though that does not exclude it from also being fact, which it may be. I would certainly welcome your challenge to change this opinion by providing me provable facts, such as how exactly I should have known in advance that the instructions in OE were not complete. Is it your contention that the computer manufacturer should have put a great big sticker on the computer warning NOT to enter an email address when signing up for newsgroups because it isn't necessary anyway??? If you are here to be useful, then tell me where I missed this information which you seem to believe is so obvious. If I was not tricked, and indeed I somehow missed the warning, or misread the instructions, please, show me where, and I will humbly apologize to you! Otherwise, the reason for my post here was to be helpful to others, so they can avoid the same pitfalls. D. "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Sorry, but nothing in your "War and Peace" post here changes the fact that it's not Microsoft's responsibility to advise you how to set up your newsgroup account. Everything in what you have written suggests that it is your opinion that Microsoft should supply this and that is fine. It's an opinion. If that's the way you see it, you are certainly entitled to that opinion and I will be the last person to try and change it. I learned a long time ago that people who write "opinions" as long as yours seldom really want those opinions challenged or changed. The very best to you, and I sincerely hope you don't get all that much Spam from the robots. If it's any consolation, the filters are much better now than they used to be. You should be ok I think. Take care, Dudley Henriques "Dan" wrote in message ... With all due respect to you Dudley, if any is even warranted in this case: I do not believe for one minute that I am blaming the wrong people at all. I attempted to solve my problems thru my computer manufacturer and Microsoft without any success... Their answers: "I don't know" I searched the internet, found a suggestion to try getting advice on these newsgroups. Excellent suggestion, Mr. Hagen was able to provide a solution to one main problem, and I was able to deduce thru reading here, that the other problems were not due to OE, but rather other problems in the system 'spilling over' While you may know that there is no reason a real email address should have to appear (and perhaps you knew this since you were born thru devine revelation), you'll have to excuse me if my mind reading capabilities were a bit off the day I set up OE for these newsgroups. Of course I am being sarcastic to make a point here. I do 'understand' what you have written, so please take a moment to think thru what I am about to say. First, as a newer user 9 months ago, I was doing everything I could to 'research and educate' myself, in order to use my system safely. While setting up to receive these newsgroups thru OE, the setup asked me to enter my email address. Someone who has never used these newsgroups before would not know in advance that entering a false email address would still allow interaction. Indeed, most other sites on the internet would deny you access until they confirm you email address, and these same sites do not make your email public, hence the use of usernames. While setting up and using the 'help' files and instructions, not once did it indicate that a REAL email address could or should be substituted in order to thwart this KNOWN PROBLEM!!!! As it is a KNOWN PROBLEM, one should expect the necessary information to be contained in the help and instruction files. And by reading the help files and instructions I believe I have, in your words, "taken the trouble before posting to take the necessary steps to insure it doesn't appear on a forum." and "to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet." As these newsgroups came as a function of the OE software, I believe it should be incumbent on the manufacturer to provide the necessary information to protect our systems and security, which they did NOT! Had they included this information about this KNOWN problem while I was "taking the time to learn what has to be learned", I could have avoided this trouble. The option to enter a false address was never presented to me. That IS NEGLIGENCE. A simple warning about this KNOWN issue during setup would be SIMPLE for MS to provide, unless of course they want this behaviour to continue, so they can of course sell us additional software to thwart the spammers! Hmmmm! And, do you believe for one moment that it is absolutely necessary for these newsgroups to have to show the text of the email address used during setup? As I am looking at yours as I type, I will use it as an example, "From: "Dudley Henriques" " Not for one moment do I believe that is necessary for these groups to function properly. I repeat, this is a KNOWN ISSUE. A simple update to the software these groups run on could replace these email addresses with user names for safer computing. It really should be a simple fix. AND I bet I'm not nearly the only one who has experienced this. REALLY, what is the use of having a false email address here?? " goes no where, right?! So what is the purpose of it even having to be there??? Wouldn't a simple username after the 'From' be enough here?!! Knowing this problem exists and NOT fixing it on MS's part IS negligence. They release patches for nearly every other security problem that is found, so why ignore this simple solution to thwart the badguys??! Then its not a problem anymore. I do blame MS here (I don't know of or use any other company's newsgroups, but I would expect the same of them). If they do not want to provide a warning in the setup process, instructions or help files, then there should be NO REASON to even ask for an email address during setup, since a valid address is obviously not necessary for this application to function, and therefore the necessity of having to enter an email address at all (real or false) is misleading to the user, and ONLY serves to assist the spammers in their quest! As you felt the need to express your opinion here under this thread, I hope my response will give you pause to consider the logic of my arguments above. If I am wrong about the set up instructions in OE, please tell me where I may find the message that I may input a real or false email address when I am asked to enter this during set up, and I will gladly apologize for my ignorance. Otherwise, I will continue to believe that the fact an email address is even asked for during setup instead of a username only, IS indeed an unnecessary hole in the security of the software that should be patched, especially since the address serves ZERO useful function. And I will still contend that despite my attempt at due diligence, the lack of a warning or proper instructions or notification to this KNOWN problem IS what has caused this problem. I guess if I had been gifted with ESP, I may have felt the need to surf the net for 30 hours until I came across something that warned that newsgroups ask you on setup to input an unnecessary email address that may or may not be real. Shame on me for thinking that the software that came with my computer from a well known company like MS would include any necessary instructions in its help files to prevent me from operating the software in an unsecure way, let alone to be mislead into entering an address that is not even necessary. But since it seems that you do possess these psychic abilities, could you please provide me with the winning numbers for this Wednesdays Ontario Lotto 6/49 Draw?? That way I never have to bother you again as I will just hire someone to find the solutions I need. Maybe I can find and afford a psychic for that position!! But seriously, I do hope my explanation here will give you cause to rethink your previous position, and consider that most of the people who come here looking for answers, do so because of inexperience, and are also being mislead into opening a hole in their own security. And perhaps the MS MVP's who read this may see the logic as well, and report back to MS that this really should be fixed to improve security for everyone. I've spent hours a day for the last 9 months surfing the net at a myriad of sites, signed up to many of them and provided the 'necessary' or 'requested' sign-up information, but I can confidently say that every single piece of spam I am bombarded with daily has originated from my sign up HERE as my 5 other addresses have never received a single piece of spam over the same time. I simply believe this is a big enough problem that people should have the right to be informed directly by the software maker or network owner, or the request for and use of an email address (real or false, and both unnecessary) during setup of the newsgroups be stopped. As I see that your email address is not real, I must assume that you do not like spam either. It also doesn't take very long to just check any number of the posts here from people just looking for help, to see that they have also made the same mistake of using their real email address. I'm sure they were tricked into entering it the same as me, and they will learn the same lessons the hard way. All because in their search for good help, the "vehicle didn't have a seatbelt WARNING, so to speak". Go ahead check the posts. Do you think all these people just should have had this inherent knowledge of how this all works?! They have been tricked, same as me, and some don't even know it yet!! A Christmas Wish for safer networks for all of us, D. "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... I think you might be blaming the wrong people here. I respectfully suggest that you consider doing some boning up on Usenet before blaming Microsoft for something that is not their fault. There is absolutely no reason why your real email address should have to appear on a newsgroup if you don't want it to appear and more importantly in this case, have taken the trouble before posting to take the necessary steps to insure it doesn't appear on a forum. The use of actual email addresses on Usenet is now and has always been an option of individual choice. There is absolutely no reason for Microsoft to suggest to anyone how they should set up their Usenet account. That option is up to YOU and no one else. It is incumbent on YOU , NOT Microsoft or anyone else for that matter, to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet. Microsoft is not in the Usenet business. How you set up OE to handle newsgroups is entirely your choice and your personal responsibility. Don't blame Microsoft for your own lack of understanding. I respectfully suggest that you do your homework concerning Usenet. There are ample sources available from which to obtain this knowledge. If you intend using Usenet, by all means, learn how to protect yourself. When it comes to being on line, don't wait to get nailed, then blame Microsoft for your troubles. Believe me, Microsoft gets blamed for enough already without you blaming them for things over which they have no control. :-)) Not meant to be a flame here....just some "friendly" advice :-))))))))))) Dudley Henriques "Dan" wrote in message ... This is not a request for assistance, but rather a warning for newer users here, to hopefully prevent you from the same frustrations I have experienced as a result of using this forum. Let me say that I have found this forum EXTREMELY helpful for solving problems. Bruce Hagen, if he is still around, did an excellent job assisting me. He also alerted me to the fact that my real email address was available to all on this forum, BECAUSE MICROSOFT FAILS TO WARN & INSTRUCT USERS WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, that you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address!!!!!!!!!! When I set this up, it required me to enter an email address in order to post here. Nothing warned me that my REAL address would be easily accessible to all here, NOR did instruct me that I could enter a false address to thwart the spammers when entering the REQUIRED email address during sign-up!!!! Had Microsoft offered this very simple instruction in the beginning, I am absolutely convinced that I would have NEVER, EVER, received ANY SPAM!!!! This is on their network afterall, and their NEGLIGENCE to provide this security information has caused me a great deal of headache, that now seems will NEVER go away, making me wish I had never, ever used this newsgroup in the first place!!! Thank you to Bruce Hagen for recognizing and informing me about this dangerous security breach. It would have been better if Microsoft were RESPONSIBLE enough to have given this information in the newsgroup setup instructions and process!!!!! The RESULT of this NEGLIGENCE on Microsoft's part is that after just a few postings before Bruce's alert to me, I am now bombarded on this email account daily for the last 9 MONTHS by spammers, and ONLY on this account. I have NEVER received spam on ANY OTHER email account I have. Many of these spams have been VIRUSES & WORMS!!!! And luckily my Anti-Virus scanners have been able to remove them. Although I immediately followed Bruce's intructions to change the email address displayed, it was too late, and I don't think there is anyway for me to remove the previous postings with the real email address. So Microsoft has left me with breach in security which it seems I can NEVER fix, unless I CANCEL this email account. That is really SAD!!! and worse yet, it was TOTALLY UNNECESSARY!!! If Microsoft were honestly SERIOUS about network security, they would alert ALL people to this security breach before allowing them to use these newsgroups!! I don't even want to imagine how much worse this would be if Bruce had not alerted me to this issue at all, but I hope this message will possibly assist others in avoiding the headaches I have had. And Thanks A Lot Microsoft... I thought your mission was to provide solutions to the masses, not to cause extra problems... but what do I know anyway. Best of Luck to All, Sincerely, D. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry; every company who writes anything that has anything to do with groups
should be educating their client base about this and the problem goes a lot further than just MS as you pointed out. Education is key and until it comes about, this situation won't change. What the OP may need now is to learn how to handle spam. Pop` Dudley Henriques wrote: Sorry, but nothing in your "War and Peace" post here changes the fact that it's not Microsoft's responsibility to advise you how to set up your newsgroup account. Everything in what you have written suggests that it is your opinion that Microsoft should supply this and that is fine. It's an opinion. If that's the way you see it, you are certainly entitled to that opinion and I will be the last person to try and change it. I learned a long time ago that people who write "opinions" as long as yours seldom really want those opinions challenged or changed. The very best to you, and I sincerely hope you don't get all that much Spam from the robots. If it's any consolation, the filters are much better now than they used to be. You should be ok I think. Take care, Dudley Henriques "Dan" wrote in message ... With all due respect to you Dudley, if any is even warranted in this case: I do not believe for one minute that I am blaming the wrong people at all. I attempted to solve my problems thru my computer manufacturer and Microsoft without any success... Their answers: "I don't know" I searched the internet, found a suggestion to try getting advice on these newsgroups. Excellent suggestion, Mr. Hagen was able to provide a solution to one main problem, and I was able to deduce thru reading here, that the other problems were not due to OE, but rather other problems in the system 'spilling over' While you may know that there is no reason a real email address should have to appear (and perhaps you knew this since you were born thru devine revelation), you'll have to excuse me if my mind reading capabilities were a bit off the day I set up OE for these newsgroups. Of course I am being sarcastic to make a point here. I do 'understand' what you have written, so please take a moment to think thru what I am about to say. First, as a newer user 9 months ago, I was doing everything I could to 'research and educate' myself, in order to use my system safely. While setting up to receive these newsgroups thru OE, the setup asked me to enter my email address. Someone who has never used these newsgroups before would not know in advance that entering a false email address would still allow interaction. Indeed, most other sites on the internet would deny you access until they confirm you email address, and these same sites do not make your email public, hence the use of usernames. While setting up and using the 'help' files and instructions, not once did it indicate that a REAL email address could or should be substituted in order to thwart this KNOWN PROBLEM!!!! As it is a KNOWN PROBLEM, one should expect the necessary information to be contained in the help and instruction files. And by reading the help files and instructions I believe I have, in your words, "taken the trouble before posting to take the necessary steps to insure it doesn't appear on a forum." and "to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet." As these newsgroups came as a function of the OE software, I believe it should be incumbent on the manufacturer to provide the necessary information to protect our systems and security, which they did NOT! Had they included this information about this KNOWN problem while I was "taking the time to learn what has to be learned", I could have avoided this trouble. The option to enter a false address was never presented to me. That IS NEGLIGENCE. A simple warning about this KNOWN issue during setup would be SIMPLE for MS to provide, unless of course they want this behaviour to continue, so they can of course sell us additional software to thwart the spammers! Hmmmm! And, do you believe for one moment that it is absolutely necessary for these newsgroups to have to show the text of the email address used during setup? As I am looking at yours as I type, I will use it as an example, "From: "Dudley Henriques" " Not for one moment do I believe that is necessary for these groups to function properly. I repeat, this is a KNOWN ISSUE. A simple update to the software these groups run on could replace these email addresses with user names for safer computing. It really should be a simple fix. AND I bet I'm not nearly the only one who has experienced this. REALLY, what is the use of having a false email address here?? " goes no where, right?! So what is the purpose of it even having to be there??? Wouldn't a simple username after the 'From' be enough here?!! Knowing this problem exists and NOT fixing it on MS's part IS negligence. They release patches for nearly every other security problem that is found, so why ignore this simple solution to thwart the badguys??! Then its not a problem anymore. I do blame MS here (I don't know of or use any other company's newsgroups, but I would expect the same of them). If they do not want to provide a warning in the setup process, instructions or help files, then there should be NO REASON to even ask for an email address during setup, since a valid address is obviously not necessary for this application to function, and therefore the necessity of having to enter an email address at all (real or false) is misleading to the user, and ONLY serves to assist the spammers in their quest! As you felt the need to express your opinion here under this thread, I hope my response will give you pause to consider the logic of my arguments above. If I am wrong about the set up instructions in OE, please tell me where I may find the message that I may input a real or false email address when I am asked to enter this during set up, and I will gladly apologize for my ignorance. Otherwise, I will continue to believe that the fact an email address is even asked for during setup instead of a username only, IS indeed an unnecessary hole in the security of the software that should be patched, especially since the address serves ZERO useful function. And I will still contend that despite my attempt at due diligence, the lack of a warning or proper instructions or notification to this KNOWN problem IS what has caused this problem. I guess if I had been gifted with ESP, I may have felt the need to surf the net for 30 hours until I came across something that warned that newsgroups ask you on setup to input an unnecessary email address that may or may not be real. Shame on me for thinking that the software that came with my computer from a well known company like MS would include any necessary instructions in its help files to prevent me from operating the software in an unsecure way, let alone to be mislead into entering an email address that is not even necessary. But since it seems that you do possess these psychic abilities, could you please provide me with the winning numbers for this Wednesdays Ontario Lotto 6/49 Draw?? That way I never have to bother you again as I will just hire someone to find the solutions I need. Maybe I can find and afford a psychic for that position!! But seriously, I do hope my explanation here will give you cause to rethink your previous position, and consider that most of the people who come here looking for answers, do so because of inexperience, and are also being mislead into opening a hole in their own security. And perhaps the MS MVP's who read this may see the logic as well, and report back to MS that this really should be fixed to improve security for everyone. I've spent hours a day for the last 9 months surfing the net at a myriad of sites, signed up to many of them and provided the 'necessary' or 'requested' sign-up information, but I can confidently say that every single piece of spam I am bombarded with daily has originated from my sign up HERE as my 5 other email addresses have never received a single piece of spam over the same time. I simply believe this is a big enough problem that people should have the right to be informed directly by the software maker or network owner, or the request for and use of an email address (real or false, and both unnecessary) during setup of the newsgroups be stopped. As I see that your email address is not real, I must assume that you do not like spam either. It also doesn't take very long to just check any number of the posts here from people just looking for help, to see that they have also made the same mistake of using their real email address. I'm sure they were tricked into entering it the same as me, and they will learn the same lessons the hard way. All because in their search for good help, the "vehicle didn't have a seatbelt WARNING, so to speak". Go ahead check the posts. Do you think all these people just should have had this inherent knowledge of how this all works?! They have been tricked, same as me, and some don't even know it yet!! A Christmas Wish for safer networks for all of us, D. "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... I think you might be blaming the wrong people here. I respectfully suggest that you consider doing some boning up on Usenet before blaming Microsoft for something that is not their fault. There is absolutely no reason why your real email address should have to appear on a newsgroup if you don't want it to appear and more importantly in this case, have taken the trouble before posting to take the necessary steps to insure it doesn't appear on a forum. The use of actual email addresses on Usenet is now and has always been an option of individual choice. There is absolutely no reason for Microsoft to suggest to anyone how they should set up their Usenet account. That option is up to YOU and no one else. It is incumbent on YOU , NOT Microsoft or anyone else for that matter, to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet. Microsoft is not in the Usenet business. How you set up OE to handle newsgroups is entirely your choice and your personal responsibility. Don't blame Microsoft for your own lack of understanding. I respectfully suggest that you do your homework concerning Usenet. There are ample sources available from which to obtain this knowledge. If you intend using Usenet, by all means, learn how to protect yourself. When it comes to being on line, don't wait to get nailed, then blame Microsoft for your troubles. Believe me, Microsoft gets blamed for enough already without you blaming them for things over which they have no control. :-)) Not meant to be a flame here....just some "friendly" advice :-))))))))))) Dudley Henriques "Dan" wrote in message ... This is not a request for assistance, but rather a warning for newer users here, to hopefully prevent you from the same frustrations I have experienced as a result of using this forum. Let me say that I have found this forum EXTREMELY helpful for solving problems. Bruce Hagen, if he is still around, did an excellent job assisting me. He also alerted me to the fact that my real email address was available to all on this forum, BECAUSE MICROSOFT FAILS TO WARN & INSTRUCT USERS WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, that you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address!!!!!!!!!! When I set this up, it required me to enter an email address in order to post here. Nothing warned me that my REAL address would be easily accessible to all here, NOR did instruct me that I could enter a false address to thwart the spammers when entering the REQUIRED email address during sign-up!!!! Had Microsoft offered this very simple instruction in the beginning, I am absolutely convinced that I would have NEVER, EVER, received ANY SPAM!!!! This is on their network afterall, and their NEGLIGENCE to provide this security information has caused me a great deal of headache, that now seems will NEVER go away, making me wish I had never, ever used this newsgroup in the first place!!! Thank you to Bruce Hagen for recognizing and informing me about this dangerous security breach. It would have been better if Microsoft were RESPONSIBLE enough to have given this information in the newsgroup setup instructions and process!!!!! The RESULT of this NEGLIGENCE on Microsoft's part is that after just a few postings before Bruce's alert to me, I am now bombarded on this email account daily for the last 9 MONTHS by spammers, and ONLY on this account. I have NEVER received spam on ANY OTHER email account I have. Many of these spams have been VIRUSES & WORMS!!!! And luckily my Anti-Virus scanners have been able to remove them. Although I immediately followed Bruce's intructions to change the email address displayed, it was too late, and I don't think there is anyway for me to remove the previous postings with the real email address. So Microsoft has left me with breach in security which it seems I can NEVER fix, unless I CANCEL this email account. That is really SAD!!! and worse yet, it was TOTALLY UNNECESSARY!!! If Microsoft were honestly SERIOUS about network security, they would alert ALL people to this security breach before allowing them to use these newsgroups!! I don't even want to imagine how much worse this would be if Bruce had not alerted me to this issue at all, but I hope this message will possibly assist others in avoiding the headaches I have had. And Thanks A Lot Microsoft... I thought your mission was to provide solutions to the masses, not to cause extra problems... but what do I know anyway. Best of Luck to All, Sincerely, D. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What the OP should learn first is not to write *epistles* that are over
200 lines long.....I got bored after 40. And his problem would be easily solved if he just changed his email address so that he no longer gets spam on it. Don't know about his ISP, but I get 7 or 10, plus a bunch of throwaway accounts with mine (Rogers). Before they implemented anti-spam devices, I got 100 spam/day on average and used Mailwasher to get rid of them. ** Eureka, he could use that program to vet his email. But the last time I advocated using it, some dickbrain MVP (Corey, Carey?) on the XP groups accused me of shilling for them....lol. Off to do some Christmassy stuff.....Heather "Pop`" wrote in message ... Sorry; every company who writes anything that has anything to do with groups should be educating their client base about this and the problem goes a lot further than just MS as you pointed out. Education is key and until it comes about, this situation won't change. What the OP may need now is to learn how to handle spam. Pop` Dudley Henriques wrote: Sorry, but nothing in your "War and Peace" post here changes the fact that it's not Microsoft's responsibility to advise you how to set up your newsgroup account. Everything in what you have written suggests that it is your opinion that Microsoft should supply this and that is fine. It's an opinion. If that's the way you see it, you are certainly entitled to that opinion and I will be the last person to try and change it. I learned a long time ago that people who write "opinions" as long as yours seldom really want those opinions challenged or changed. The very best to you, and I sincerely hope you don't get all that much Spam from the robots. If it's any consolation, the filters are much better now than they used to be. You should be ok I think. Take care, Dudley Henriques "Dan" wrote in message ... With all due respect to you Dudley, if any is even warranted in this case: I do not believe for one minute that I am blaming the wrong people at all. I attempted to solve my problems thru my computer manufacturer and Microsoft without any success... Their answers: "I don't know" I searched the internet, found a suggestion to try getting advice on these newsgroups. Excellent suggestion, Mr. Hagen was able to provide a solution to one main problem, and I was able to deduce thru reading here, that the other problems were not due to OE, but rather other problems in the system 'spilling over' While you may know that there is no reason a real email address should have to appear (and perhaps you knew this since you were born thru devine revelation), you'll have to excuse me if my mind reading capabilities were a bit off the day I set up OE for these newsgroups. Of course I am being sarcastic to make a point here. I do 'understand' what you have written, so please take a moment to think thru what I am about to say. First, as a newer user 9 months ago, I was doing everything I could to 'research and educate' myself, in order to use my system safely. While setting up to receive these newsgroups thru OE, the setup asked me to enter my email address. Someone who has never used these newsgroups before would not know in advance that entering a false email address would still allow interaction. Indeed, most other sites on the internet would deny you access until they confirm you email address, and these same sites do not make your email public, hence the use of usernames. While setting up and using the 'help' files and instructions, not once did it indicate that a REAL email address could or should be substituted in order to thwart this KNOWN PROBLEM!!!! As it is a KNOWN PROBLEM, one should expect the necessary information to be contained in the help and instruction files. And by reading the help files and instructions I believe I have, in your words, "taken the trouble before posting to take the necessary steps to insure it doesn't appear on a forum." and "to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet." As these newsgroups came as a function of the OE software, I believe it should be incumbent on the manufacturer to provide the necessary information to protect our systems and security, which they did NOT! Had they included this information about this KNOWN problem while I was "taking the time to learn what has to be learned", I could have avoided this trouble. The option to enter a false address was never presented to me. That IS NEGLIGENCE. A simple warning about this KNOWN issue during setup would be SIMPLE for MS to provide, unless of course they want this behaviour to continue, so they can of course sell us additional software to thwart the spammers! Hmmmm! And, do you believe for one moment that it is absolutely necessary for these newsgroups to have to show the text of the email address used during setup? As I am looking at yours as I type, I will use it as an example, "From: "Dudley Henriques" " Not for one moment do I believe that is necessary for these groups to function properly. I repeat, this is a KNOWN ISSUE. A simple update to the software these groups run on could replace these email addresses with user names for safer computing. It really should be a simple fix. AND I bet I'm not nearly the only one who has experienced this. REALLY, what is the use of having a false email address here?? " goes no where, right?! So what is the purpose of it even having to be there??? Wouldn't a simple username after the 'From' be enough here?!! Knowing this problem exists and NOT fixing it on MS's part IS negligence. They release patches for nearly every other security problem that is found, so why ignore this simple solution to thwart the badguys??! Then its not a problem anymore. I do blame MS here (I don't know of or use any other company's newsgroups, but I would expect the same of them). If they do not want to provide a warning in the setup process, instructions or help files, then there should be NO REASON to even ask for an email address during setup, since a valid address is obviously not necessary for this application to function, and therefore the necessity of having to enter an email address at all (real or false) is misleading to the user, and ONLY serves to assist the spammers in their quest! As you felt the need to express your opinion here under this thread, I hope my response will give you pause to consider the logic of my arguments above. If I am wrong about the set up instructions in OE, please tell me where I may find the message that I may input a real or false email address when I am asked to enter this during set up, and I will gladly apologize for my ignorance. Otherwise, I will continue to believe that the fact an email address is even asked for during setup instead of a username only, IS indeed an unnecessary hole in the security of the software that should be patched, especially since the address serves ZERO useful function. And I will still contend that despite my attempt at due diligence, the lack of a warning or proper instructions or notification to this KNOWN problem IS what has caused this problem. I guess if I had been gifted with ESP, I may have felt the need to surf the net for 30 hours until I came across something that warned that newsgroups ask you on setup to input an unnecessary email address that may or may not be real. Shame on me for thinking that the software that came with my computer from a well known company like MS would include any necessary instructions in its help files to prevent me from operating the software in an unsecure way, let alone to be mislead into entering an email address that is not even necessary. But since it seems that you do possess these psychic abilities, could you please provide me with the winning numbers for this Wednesdays Ontario Lotto 6/49 Draw?? That way I never have to bother you again as I will just hire someone to find the solutions I need. Maybe I can find and afford a psychic for that position!! But seriously, I do hope my explanation here will give you cause to rethink your previous position, and consider that most of the people who come here looking for answers, do so because of inexperience, and are also being mislead into opening a hole in their own security. And perhaps the MS MVP's who read this may see the logic as well, and report back to MS that this really should be fixed to improve security for everyone. I've spent hours a day for the last 9 months surfing the net at a myriad of sites, signed up to many of them and provided the 'necessary' or 'requested' sign-up information, but I can confidently say that every single piece of spam I am bombarded with daily has originated from my sign up HERE as my 5 other email addresses have never received a single piece of spam over the same time. I simply believe this is a big enough problem that people should have the right to be informed directly by the software maker or network owner, or the request for and use of an email address (real or false, and both unnecessary) during setup of the newsgroups be stopped. As I see that your email address is not real, I must assume that you do not like spam either. It also doesn't take very long to just check any number of the posts here from people just looking for help, to see that they have also made the same mistake of using their real email address. I'm sure they were tricked into entering it the same as me, and they will learn the same lessons the hard way. All because in their search for good help, the "vehicle didn't have a seatbelt WARNING, so to speak". Go ahead check the posts. Do you think all these people just should have had this inherent knowledge of how this all works?! They have been tricked, same as me, and some don't even know it yet!! A Christmas Wish for safer networks for all of us, D. "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... I think you might be blaming the wrong people here. I respectfully suggest that you consider doing some boning up on Usenet before blaming Microsoft for something that is not their fault. There is absolutely no reason why your real email address should have to appear on a newsgroup if you don't want it to appear and more importantly in this case, have taken the trouble before posting to take the necessary steps to insure it doesn't appear on a forum. The use of actual email addresses on Usenet is now and has always been an option of individual choice. There is absolutely no reason for Microsoft to suggest to anyone how they should set up their Usenet account. That option is up to YOU and no one else. It is incumbent on YOU , NOT Microsoft or anyone else for that matter, to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet. Microsoft is not in the Usenet business. How you set up OE to handle newsgroups is entirely your choice and your personal responsibility. Don't blame Microsoft for your own lack of understanding. I respectfully suggest that you do your homework concerning Usenet. There are ample sources available from which to obtain this knowledge. If you intend using Usenet, by all means, learn how to protect yourself. When it comes to being on line, don't wait to get nailed, then blame Microsoft for your troubles. Believe me, Microsoft gets blamed for enough already without you blaming them for things over which they have no control. :-)) Not meant to be a flame here....just some "friendly" advice :-))))))))))) Dudley Henriques "Dan" wrote in message ... This is not a request for assistance, but rather a warning for newer users here, to hopefully prevent you from the same frustrations I have experienced as a result of using this forum. Let me say that I have found this forum EXTREMELY helpful for solving problems. Bruce Hagen, if he is still around, did an excellent job assisting me. He also alerted me to the fact that my real email address was available to all on this forum, BECAUSE MICROSOFT FAILS TO WARN & INSTRUCT USERS WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, that you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address!!!!!!!!!! When I set this up, it required me to enter an email address in order to post here. Nothing warned me that my REAL address would be easily accessible to all here, NOR did instruct me that I could enter a false address to thwart the spammers when entering the REQUIRED email address during sign-up!!!! Had Microsoft offered this very simple instruction in the beginning, I am absolutely convinced that I would have NEVER, EVER, received ANY SPAM!!!! This is on their network afterall, and their NEGLIGENCE to provide this security information has caused me a great deal of headache, that now seems will NEVER go away, making me wish I had never, ever used this newsgroup in the first place!!! Thank you to Bruce Hagen for recognizing and informing me about this dangerous security breach. It would have been better if Microsoft were RESPONSIBLE enough to have given this information in the newsgroup setup instructions and process!!!!! The RESULT of this NEGLIGENCE on Microsoft's part is that after just a few postings before Bruce's alert to me, I am now bombarded on this email account daily for the last 9 MONTHS by spammers, and ONLY on this account. I have NEVER received spam on ANY OTHER email account I have. Many of these spams have been VIRUSES & WORMS!!!! And luckily my Anti-Virus scanners have been able to remove them. Although I immediately followed Bruce's intructions to change the email address displayed, it was too late, and I don't think there is anyway for me to remove the previous postings with the real email address. So Microsoft has left me with breach in security which it seems I can NEVER fix, unless I CANCEL this email account. That is really SAD!!! and worse yet, it was TOTALLY UNNECESSARY!!! If Microsoft were honestly SERIOUS about network security, they would alert ALL people to this security breach before allowing them to use these newsgroups!! I don't even want to imagine how much worse this would be if Bruce had not alerted me to this issue at all, but I hope this message will possibly assist others in avoiding the headaches I have had. And Thanks A Lot Microsoft... I thought your mission was to provide solutions to the masses, not to cause extra problems... but what do I know anyway. Best of Luck to All, Sincerely, D. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan" wrote in message ... With all due respect to you Dudley, if any is even warranted in this case: I do not believe for one minute that I am blaming the wrong people at all. I attempted to solve my problems thru my computer manufacturer and Microsoft without any success... Their answers: "I don't know" I searched the internet, found a suggestion to try getting advice on these newsgroups. Excellent suggestion, Mr. Hagen was able to provide a solution to one main problem, and I was able to deduce thru reading here, that the other problems were not due to OE, but rather other problems in the system 'spilling over' While you may know that there is no reason a real email address should have to appear (and perhaps you knew this since you were born thru devine revelation), you'll have to excuse me if my mind reading capabilities were a bit off the day I set up OE for these newsgroups. Of course I am being sarcastic to make a point here. I do 'understand' what you have written, so please take a moment to think thru what I am about to say. First, as a newer user 9 months ago, I was doing everything I could to 'research and educate' myself, in order to use my system safely. While setting up to receive these newsgroups thru OE, the setup asked me to enter my email address. Someone who has never used these newsgroups before would not know in advance that entering a false email address would still allow interaction. Indeed, most other sites on the internet would deny you access until they confirm you email address, and these same sites do not make your email public, hence the use of usernames. While setting up and using the 'help' files and instructions, not once did it indicate that a REAL email address could or should be substituted in order to thwart this KNOWN PROBLEM!!!! As it is a KNOWN PROBLEM, one should expect the necessary information to be contained in the help and instruction files. And by reading the help files and instructions I believe I have, in your words, "taken the trouble before posting to take the necessary steps to insure it doesn't appear on a forum." and "to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet." As these newsgroups came as a function of the OE software, I believe it should be incumbent on the manufacturer to provide the necessary information to protect our systems and security, which they did NOT! Had they included this information about this KNOWN problem while I was "taking the time to learn what has to be learned", I could have avoided this trouble. The option to enter a false address was never presented to me. That IS NEGLIGENCE. A simple warning about this KNOWN issue during setup would be SIMPLE for MS to provide, unless of course they want this behaviour to continue, so they can of course sell us additional software to thwart the spammers! Hmmmm! And, do you believe for one moment that it is absolutely necessary for these newsgroups to have to show the text of the email address used during setup? As I am looking at yours as I type, I will use it as an example, "From: "Dudley Henriques" " Not for one moment do I believe that is necessary for these groups to function properly. I repeat, this is a KNOWN ISSUE. A simple update to the software these groups run on could replace these email addresses with user names for safer computing. It really should be a simple fix. AND I bet I'm not nearly the only one who has experienced this. REALLY, what is the use of having a false email address here?? " goes no where, right?! So what is the purpose of it even having to be there??? Wouldn't a simple username after the 'From' be enough here?!! Knowing this problem exists and NOT fixing it on MS's part IS negligence. They release patches for nearly every other security problem that is found, so why ignore this simple solution to thwart the badguys??! Then its not a problem anymore. I do blame MS here (I don't know of or use any other company's newsgroups, but I would expect the same of them). If they do not want to provide a warning in the setup process, instructions or help files, then there should be NO REASON to even ask for an email address during setup, since a valid address is obviously not necessary for this application to function, and therefore the necessity of having to enter an email address at all (real or false) is misleading to the user, and ONLY serves to assist the spammers in their quest! As you felt the need to express your opinion here under this thread, I hope my response will give you pause to consider the logic of my arguments above. If I am wrong about the set up instructions in OE, please tell me where I may find the message that I may input a real or false email address when I am asked to enter this during set up, and I will gladly apologize for my ignorance. Otherwise, I will continue to believe that the fact an email address is even asked for during setup instead of a username only, IS indeed an unnecessary hole in the security of the software that should be patched, especially since the address serves ZERO useful function. And I will still contend that despite my attempt at due diligence, the lack of a warning or proper instructions or notification to this KNOWN problem IS what has caused this problem. I guess if I had been gifted with ESP, I may have felt the need to surf the net for 30 hours until I came across something that warned that newsgroups ask you on setup to input an unnecessary email address that may or may not be real. Shame on me for thinking that the software that came with my computer from a well known company like MS would include any necessary instructions in its help files to prevent me from operating the software in an unsecure way, let alone to be mislead into entering an address that is not even necessary. But since it seems that you do possess these psychic abilities, could you please provide me with the winning numbers for this Wednesdays Ontario Lotto 6/49 Draw?? That way I never have to bother you again as I will just hire someone to find the solutions I need. Maybe I can find and afford a psychic for that position!! But seriously, I do hope my explanation here will give you cause to rethink your previous position, and consider that most of the people who come here looking for answers, do so because of inexperience, and are also being mislead into opening a hole in their own security. And perhaps the MS MVP's who read this may see the logic as well, and report back to MS that this really should be fixed to improve security for everyone. I've spent hours a day for the last 9 months surfing the net at a myriad of sites, signed up to many of them and provided the 'necessary' or 'requested' sign-up information, but I can confidently say that every single piece of spam I am bombarded with daily has originated from my sign up HERE as my 5 other addresses have never received a single piece of spam over the same time. I simply believe this is a big enough problem that people should have the right to be informed directly by the software maker or network owner, or the request for and use of an email address (real or false, and both unnecessary) during setup of the newsgroups be stopped. As I see that your email address is not real, I must assume that you do not like spam either. It also doesn't take very long to just check any number of the posts here from people just looking for help, to see that they have also made the same mistake of using their real email address. I'm sure they were tricked into entering it the same as me, and they will learn the same lessons the hard way. All because in their search for good help, the "vehicle didn't have a seatbelt WARNING, so to speak". Go ahead check the posts. Do you think all these people just should have had this inherent knowledge of how this all works?! They have been tricked, same as me, and some don't even know it yet!! A Christmas Wish for safer networks for all of us, D. "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... I think you might be blaming the wrong people here. I respectfully suggest that you consider doing some boning up on Usenet before blaming Microsoft for something that is not their fault. There is absolutely no reason why your real email address should have to appear on a newsgroup if you don't want it to appear and more importantly in this case, have taken the trouble before posting to take the necessary steps to insure it doesn't appear on a forum. The use of actual email addresses on Usenet is now and has always been an option of individual choice. There is absolutely no reason for Microsoft to suggest to anyone how they should set up their Usenet account. That option is up to YOU and no one else. It is incumbent on YOU , NOT Microsoft or anyone else for that matter, to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet. Microsoft is not in the Usenet business. How you set up OE to handle newsgroups is entirely your choice and your personal responsibility. Don't blame Microsoft for your own lack of understanding. I respectfully suggest that you do your homework concerning Usenet. There are ample sources available from which to obtain this knowledge. If you intend using Usenet, by all means, learn how to protect yourself. When it comes to being on line, don't wait to get nailed, then blame Microsoft for your troubles. Believe me, Microsoft gets blamed for enough already without you blaming them for things over which they have no control. :-)) Not meant to be a flame here....just some "friendly" advice :-))))))))))) Dudley Henriques "Dan" wrote in message ... This is not a request for assistance, but rather a warning for newer users here, to hopefully prevent you from the same frustrations I have experienced as a result of using this forum. Let me say that I have found this forum EXTREMELY helpful for solving problems. Bruce Hagen, if he is still around, did an excellent job assisting me. He also alerted me to the fact that my real email address was available to all on this forum, BECAUSE MICROSOFT FAILS TO WARN & INSTRUCT USERS WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, that you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address!!!!!!!!!! When I set this up, it required me to enter an email address in order to post here. Nothing warned me that my REAL address would be easily accessible to all here, NOR did instruct me that I could enter a false address to thwart the spammers when entering the REQUIRED email address during sign-up!!!! Had Microsoft offered this very simple instruction in the beginning, I am absolutely convinced that I would have NEVER, EVER, received ANY SPAM!!!! This is on their network afterall, and their NEGLIGENCE to provide this security information has caused me a great deal of headache, that now seems will NEVER go away, making me wish I had never, ever used this newsgroup in the first place!!! Thank you to Bruce Hagen for recognizing and informing me about this dangerous security breach. It would have been better if Microsoft were RESPONSIBLE enough to have given this information in the newsgroup setup instructions and process!!!!! The RESULT of this NEGLIGENCE on Microsoft's part is that after just a few postings before Bruce's alert to me, I am now bombarded on this email account daily for the last 9 MONTHS by spammers, and ONLY on this account. I have NEVER received spam on ANY OTHER email account I have. Many of these spams have been VIRUSES & WORMS!!!! And luckily my Anti-Virus scanners have been able to remove them. Although I immediately followed Bruce's intructions to change the email address displayed, it was too late, and I don't think there is anyway for me to remove the previous postings with the real email address. So Microsoft has left me with breach in security which it seems I can NEVER fix, unless I CANCEL this email account. That is really SAD!!! and worse yet, it was TOTALLY UNNECESSARY!!! If Microsoft were honestly SERIOUS about network security, they would alert ALL people to this security breach before allowing them to use these newsgroups!! I don't even want to imagine how much worse this would be if Bruce had not alerted me to this issue at all, but I hope this message will possibly assist others in avoiding the headaches I have had. And Thanks A Lot Microsoft... I thought your mission was to provide solutions to the masses, not to cause extra problems... but what do I know anyway. Best of Luck to All, Sincerely, D. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For those who followed this thread with interest:
I was told that I should not blame Microsoft for not including in their full disclosure in their 'Help' files about how to SAFELY setup the newsreader in THEIR product (OE) for use on THEIR public newsgroup network. To quote: "There is absolutely no reason for Microsoft to suggest to anyone how they should set up their Usenet account. That option is up to YOU and no one else. It is incumbent on YOU , NOT Microsoft or anyone else for that matter, to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet." It was suggested to me to "do your homework". I have reviewed once again the help files in OE, and they do NOT provide any information at all about protecting yourself from the spam harvesters by entering a false email address. EVEN though they know this is a persistent problem, and one of the most common causes of spam, and the resulting security threats such as viruses that come with it! All they would have to do is include this 'suggestion' of using a false address in their help file to put an end to a great deal of this. This information was not provided to me until it was too late, and only because an MVP here noticed my mistake and kindly informed me. I was further told that, "There are ample sources available from which to obtain this knowledge. If you intend using Usenet, by all means, learn how to protect yourself." Most people would expect the instructions (help files) in a respected software manufacturers product to contain 'safe' instructions for the setup of that products features, but as I have noted above,such do not exist despite the 'known' problems. The problem lies in the fact that the 'known' problem is only common knowledge to those already using newsgroups. As NEW users set up their newsreader accounts, they do not necessarily know of the problem, so why would they go searching for these "ample sources" if they don't know the problem exists in the first place. Like myself at the time, they will find out the hard way as the spam starts pouring in, and like myself, will be wondering why they were not warned first, and also why the setup protocol required the input of an email address when it is clearly not necessary to participate here. As the person who suggested to me that it was my own fault for somehow not intuitively knowing all this in advance, and same person could not provide any links these 'ample sources... of knowledge", I went looking. I found these links that provide instructions for setting up newsgroup accounts: http://www.insideoe.com/resources/co...tm#setupmsnews http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/ie/...groups101.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/...ups/howto.mspx Checking them, you will note the first one instructs you to "enter AN email address" and the 3rd one (from the Microsoft site) instructs you to "enter YOUR email address" !!! NO mention is made that you do NOT "need" to enter your ACTUAL email address, nor a suggestion to enter something false for your own computer security, despite the fact Microsoft KNOWS of this problem. These setup instructions deceptively suggest you enter your email address as if it is a necessary part of the setup to use the service, when it is NOT!! Indeed, I did find ONE site that did provide proper setup instructions for the newsreader at the site of an MVP hehttp://www.michaelstevenstech.com/ou...snewreader.htm and you will note that he made sure this warning was clear and obvious by its diferent coloured large red type! Kudos to him for providing full disclosure! This MVP recognizes that people who need setup instructions also need this warning in advance. Unfortunately, this problem is not common knowledge among the general population, so most of us do not know to go searching for additional setup information when there is zero indication of this threat in the first place. There is no reason for anyone to search for a solution (as was suggested to me) if one doesn't know there is even a problem. Of course I know of the problem now thru learning the hard way, all because Microsoft omitted to inform me thru the OE help files when I went thru THEIR setup protocol to use the newsreader. I think I have made my point now, with appropriate references to back it up. I do truly hope this post will help at least a few people to avoid the problems which Microsoft's negligence has caused me D. "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... I think you might be blaming the wrong people here. I respectfully suggest that you consider doing some boning up on Usenet before blaming Microsoft for something that is not their fault. There is absolutely no reason why your real email address should have to appear on a newsgroup if you don't want it to appear and more importantly in this case, have taken the trouble before posting to take the necessary steps to insure it doesn't appear on a forum. The use of actual email addresses on Usenet is now and has always been an option of individual choice. There is absolutely no reason for Microsoft to suggest to anyone how they should set up their Usenet account. That option is up to YOU and no one else. It is incumbent on YOU , NOT Microsoft or anyone else for that matter, to take the time to learn what has to be learned before arriving on Usenet. Microsoft is not in the Usenet business. How you set up OE to handle newsgroups is entirely your choice and your personal responsibility. Don't blame Microsoft for your own lack of understanding. I respectfully suggest that you do your homework concerning Usenet. There are ample sources available from which to obtain this knowledge. If you intend using Usenet, by all means, learn how to protect yourself. When it comes to being on line, don't wait to get nailed, then blame Microsoft for your troubles. Believe me, Microsoft gets blamed for enough already without you blaming them for things over which they have no control. :-)) Not meant to be a flame here....just some "friendly" advice :-))))))))))) Dudley Henriques "Dan" wrote in message ... This is not a request for assistance, but rather a warning for newer users here, to hopefully prevent you from the same frustrations I have experienced as a result of using this forum. Let me say that I have found this forum EXTREMELY helpful for solving problems. Bruce Hagen, if he is still around, did an excellent job assisting me. He also alerted me to the fact that my real email address was available to all on this forum, BECAUSE MICROSOFT FAILS TO WARN & INSTRUCT USERS WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, that you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address!!!!!!!!!! When I set this up, it required me to enter an email address in order to post here. Nothing warned me that my REAL address would be easily accessible to all here, NOR did instruct me that I could enter a false address to thwart the spammers when entering the REQUIRED email address during sign-up!!!! Had Microsoft offered this very simple instruction in the beginning, I am absolutely convinced that I would have NEVER, EVER, received ANY SPAM!!!! This is on their network afterall, and their NEGLIGENCE to provide this security information has caused me a great deal of headache, that now seems will NEVER go away, making me wish I had never, ever used this newsgroup in the first place!!! Thank you to Bruce Hagen for recognizing and informing me about this dangerous security breach. It would have been better if Microsoft were RESPONSIBLE enough to have given this information in the newsgroup setup instructions and process!!!!! The RESULT of this NEGLIGENCE on Microsoft's part is that after just a few postings before Bruce's alert to me, I am now bombarded on this email account daily for the last 9 MONTHS by spammers, and ONLY on this account. I have NEVER received spam on ANY OTHER email account I have. Many of these spams have been VIRUSES & WORMS!!!! And luckily my Anti-Virus scanners have been able to remove them. Although I immediately followed Bruce's intructions to change the email address displayed, it was too late, and I don't think there is anyway for me to remove the previous postings with the real email address. So Microsoft has left me with breach in security which it seems I can NEVER fix, unless I CANCEL this email account. That is really SAD!!! and worse yet, it was TOTALLY UNNECESSARY!!! If Microsoft were honestly SERIOUS about network security, they would alert ALL people to this security breach before allowing them to use these newsgroups!! I don't even want to imagine how much worse this would be if Bruce had not alerted me to this issue at all, but I hope this message will possibly assist others in avoiding the headaches I have had. And Thanks A Lot Microsoft... I thought your mission was to provide solutions to the masses, not to cause extra problems... but what do I know anyway. Best of Luck to All, Sincerely, D. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're a little "ranty", but I'm still glad you posted here.
First off, you're not talking to MS here; it's -just- a newsgroup. Second, you're right about not knowing ahead of time, and you should have. Education is the only answer to this problem and no one really tries very hard that has the ability to reach the masses; it isn't just MS. Third, it's hidden, but MS does have such advice; you just won't find it easily. Education is key. The advice to not enter your real email address is because of bottom-feeding bass turds who scrape names from groups, as you already know. However, that wasn't the case when such programs were originally written. You can use a made up name such as lid, or if you actually want to get emails from a group (unusual and not advised), then at best use a throw-away account from one of hte many freebie offereings around the 'net. Lastly, it's likely some of your spam came from ng posts here, but there are many other sources and since you're obviously a newbie to many things yet, there is still a lot to learn. I'd start at: http://www.claymania.com/safe-hex.html Be patient and read the whole thing. Also: This is not a forum: It's a newsgroup. Forums are graphics based readers for something -like- a newgroup, but are different. You can look them up wikipedia.org. Yes, this is a very helpful ng and Bruce is one of the best posters here. He posts a lot, and volunteers considerable time to this group and others too. I'm sure your comments are appreciated by Bruce. Personally I don't consider it negligence on the part of MS. I consider it illegal activity by bottom-feeding bass turds who have no redeeming qualities of any kind. And again, this isn't MS people here; most are just volunteers who went thru the same steps you are going thru; until we get more education in the world, it will continue too, since it's not just MS, but ALL web clients who are guilty of this sort of "missing info"| with only a couple of exceptions. Pop` Dan wrote: This is not a request for assistance, but rather a warning for newer users here, to hopefully prevent you from the same frustrations I have experienced as a result of using this forum. Let me say that I have found this forum EXTREMELY helpful for solving problems. Bruce Hagen, if he is still around, did an excellent job assisting me. He also alerted me to the fact that my real email address was available to all on this forum, BECAUSE MICROSOFT FAILS TO WARN & INSTRUCT USERS WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, that you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address!!!!!!!!!! When I set this up, it required me to enter an email address in order to post here. Nothing warned me that my REAL address would be easily accessible to all here, NOR did instruct me that I could enter a false address to thwart the spammers when entering the REQUIRED email address during sign-up!!!! Had Microsoft offered this very simple instruction in the beginning, I am absolutely convinced that I would have NEVER, EVER, received ANY SPAM!!!! This is on their network afterall, and their NEGLIGENCE to provide this security information has caused me a great deal of headache, that now seems will NEVER go away, making me wish I had never, ever used this newsgroup in the first place!!! Thank you to Bruce Hagen for recognizing and informing me about this dangerous security breach. It would have been better if Microsoft were RESPONSIBLE enough to have given this information in the newsgroup setup instructions and process!!!!! The RESULT of this NEGLIGENCE on Microsoft's part is that after just a few postings before Bruce's alert to me, I am now bombarded on this email account daily for the last 9 MONTHS by spammers, and ONLY on this account. I have NEVER received spam on ANY OTHER email account I have. Many of these spams have been VIRUSES & WORMS!!!! And luckily my Anti-Virus scanners have been able to remove them. Although I immediately followed Bruce's intructions to change the email address displayed, it was too late, and I don't think there is anyway for me to remove the previous postings with the real email address. So Microsoft has left me with breach in security which it seems I can NEVER fix, unless I CANCEL this email account. That is really SAD!!! and worse yet, it was TOTALLY UNNECESSARY!!! If Microsoft were honestly SERIOUS about network security, they would alert ALL people to this security breach before allowing them to use these newsgroups!! I don't even want to imagine how much worse this would be if Bruce had not alerted me to this issue at all, but I hope this message will possibly assist others in avoiding the headaches I have had. And Thanks A Lot Microsoft... I thought your mission was to provide solutions to the masses, not to cause extra problems... but what do I know anyway. Best of Luck to All, Sincerely, D. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the support also Pop, my only point from the beginning was that I
believe better disclosure is warranted in the ng setup instructions in the help files. My only reason for the original post was to warn other newbies about this undisclosed risk, and was rather surprised that my position was attacked by those in the know. I have only used this email account on just this one ng, nothing else, and only 2 posts before Bruce warned me about the problem. So I do know positively that all the spam is the result of those 2 posts.That was 9 months ago and I get so much spam from those 2 posts that some of it still gets through 3 filters including McAfee SpamKiller and the filter at my ISP. None of my other 5 accounts have received a single piece of spam in the same time, and I spend hours a day on the net and use the other accounts extensively. I know I can change the address to stop the spam completely, but I have my reasons for keeping this address, for now. I know I'm not talking to MS here, was just hoping the advice may help a few other new users. Like you said, I know the info is out their now, just not easily found, and not where and when its needed. I have seen that you volunteer, what I consider a great deal of time here to helping others as well, and I agree that the true problem is the bottom feeders, but the lack of action to combat this is only assisting them, and I do think that a simple warning (education as you put it) would go along way to help. And, I don't think this warning in an obvious place would be very difficult or costly at all to implement. I am aware that are other web client are guilty of the same, but I can not speak to those with which I am unfamiliar. I've been around a little while now, but certainly I do not know everything and I enjoy learning new things. Thanks for the link you provided, I have educated myself to most of it previously, but every new page I see adds a little bit more to that knowledge, and is much appreciated. Sorry if I was a little 'ranty', but I never imagined this would turn into such an issue. I kinda thought most regulars here would just leave this alone and let it be a good notice to the newbies who made the same mistake as me. And I did state that I was not asking for advice at the beginning of the original post, and while the posts may be rather longer than usual, no one is obligated to read them (I'm sure one click would have 'ignored' all subsequent posts), but some sure seemed to feel the need to respond to them anyway. LOL.Thanks for the comment also about "sort of liking" my posts. Unfortunately, my free time is just about up, so I'll have to let this take its own path now. I'll try to check back to see if anything gets interesting, but I suspect I won't have time to say much else with the holidays on top of work. Thank you to all of you who volunteer your valuable time here to helping others. It truly is the spirit of the season which should last all year long in a perfect world. Merry Christmas and Happy and Safe Holidays to you all and yours, Dan "Pop`" wrote in message ... You're a little "ranty", but I'm still glad you posted here. First off, you're not talking to MS here; it's -just- a newsgroup. Second, you're right about not knowing ahead of time, and you should have. Education is the only answer to this problem and no one really tries very hard that has the ability to reach the masses; it isn't just MS. Third, it's hidden, but MS does have such advice; you just won't find it easily. Education is key. The advice to not enter your real email address is because of bottom-feeding bass turds who scrape names from groups, as you already know. However, that wasn't the case when such programs were originally written. You can use a made up name such as lid, or if you actually want to get emails from a group (unusual and not advised), then at best use a throw-away account from one of hte many freebie offereings around the 'net. Lastly, it's likely some of your spam came from ng posts here, but there are many other sources and since you're obviously a newbie to many things yet, there is still a lot to learn. I'd start at: http://www.claymania.com/safe-hex.html Be patient and read the whole thing. Also: This is not a forum: It's a newsgroup. Forums are graphics based readers for something -like- a newgroup, but are different. You can look them up wikipedia.org. Yes, this is a very helpful ng and Bruce is one of the best posters here. He posts a lot, and volunteers considerable time to this group and others too. I'm sure your comments are appreciated by Bruce. Personally I don't consider it negligence on the part of MS. I consider it illegal activity by bottom-feeding bass turds who have no redeeming qualities of any kind. And again, this isn't MS people here; most are just volunteers who went thru the same steps you are going thru; until we get more education in the world, it will continue too, since it's not just MS, but ALL web clients who are guilty of this sort of "missing info"| with only a couple of exceptions. Pop` Dan wrote: This is not a request for assistance, but rather a warning for newer users here, to hopefully prevent you from the same frustrations I have experienced as a result of using this forum. Let me say that I have found this forum EXTREMELY helpful for solving problems. Bruce Hagen, if he is still around, did an excellent job assisting me. He also alerted me to the fact that my real email address was available to all on this forum, BECAUSE MICROSOFT FAILS TO WARN & INSTRUCT USERS WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, that you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address!!!!!!!!!! When I set this up, it required me to enter an email address in order to post here. Nothing warned me that my REAL address would be easily accessible to all here, NOR did instruct me that I could enter a false address to thwart the spammers when entering the REQUIRED email address during sign-up!!!! Had Microsoft offered this very simple instruction in the beginning, I am absolutely convinced that I would have NEVER, EVER, received ANY SPAM!!!! This is on their network afterall, and their NEGLIGENCE to provide this security information has caused me a great deal of headache, that now seems will NEVER go away, making me wish I had never, ever used this newsgroup in the first place!!! Thank you to Bruce Hagen for recognizing and informing me about this dangerous security breach. It would have been better if Microsoft were RESPONSIBLE enough to have given this information in the newsgroup setup instructions and process!!!!! The RESULT of this NEGLIGENCE on Microsoft's part is that after just a few postings before Bruce's alert to me, I am now bombarded on this email account daily for the last 9 MONTHS by spammers, and ONLY on this account. I have NEVER received spam on ANY OTHER email account I have. Many of these spams have been VIRUSES & WORMS!!!! And luckily my Anti-Virus scanners have been able to remove them. Although I immediately followed Bruce's intructions to change the email address displayed, it was too late, and I don't think there is anyway for me to remove the previous postings with the real email address. So Microsoft has left me with breach in security which it seems I can NEVER fix, unless I CANCEL this email account. That is really SAD!!! and worse yet, it was TOTALLY UNNECESSARY!!! If Microsoft were honestly SERIOUS about network security, they would alert ALL people to this security breach before allowing them to use these newsgroups!! I don't even want to imagine how much worse this would be if Bruce had not alerted me to this issue at all, but I hope this message will possibly assist others in avoiding the headaches I have had. And Thanks A Lot Microsoft... I thought your mission was to provide solutions to the masses, not to cause extra problems... but what do I know anyway. Best of Luck to All, Sincerely, D. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
QP
About e-mail addresses and privacy It is highly likely that you will receive unwanted messages (spam) in your regular e-mail account if you use your actual, unmodified e-mail address as your display e-mail address in a discussion group. Note that your display e-mail address is different from your notification e-mail address. Your notification e-mail address must be a real e-mail address in order for you to be notified; it is stored privately by Microsoft. It is not visible to the Community. However, your display e-mail address is public and visible to everyone in the Community. People who send unwanted bulk e-mail (spammers) regularly gather e-mail addresses from discussion groups. To help prevent spam in your regular e-mail account, the default display e-mail address when you post a message in a discussion group is . The following are the display e-mail address options you can choose from: Use a false display e-mail address we generate for you The default address will be used when you post a message if you do not change your display e-mail address. Use a modified display e-mail address Use a different version of your e-mail address that others will understand, but that spam tools can't automatically pick up. For example, if an actual e-mail address were , we would recommend modifying it to one of the following: .(donotspam) _SPAM In this case, the spam tools will send mail to an invalid e-mail address, and others will know to exclude the invalid information when they send you e-mail. Use a secondary e-mail account Set up or use an e-mail account, such as a Hotmail account, that is separate from your primary account for posting to discussion groups. /QP Source: http://www.microsoft.com/wn3/locales...mailAndPrivacy The above is admittedly from an MS page about using the web-based newsreader and the same caveats /should/ be prominent on pages about using NNTP newsreaders (e.g., http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/...ps/howto.mspx). -- ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear) MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User) Dan wrote: snip Let me say that I have found this forum EXTREMELY helpful for solving problems. Bruce Hagen, if he is still around, did an excellent job assisting me. He also alerted me to the fact that my real email address was available to all on this forum, BECAUSE MICROSOFT FAILS TO WARN & INSTRUCT USERS WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, that you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WinMail in Vista advises as you quote when its newsgroup feature is
first activated, I think. There is nothing about munging in Help, though, and the newsgroup assistance feature does not reappear. So if one doesn't bother reading it, then it's no longer available. Gmail has very good spam filters, as you know, but I'm sure that Microsoft won't point its users directly toward getting a Google email address. "PA Bear" wrote in message ... QP [paraphrase] Be aware of the Harvesters and take care [/paraphrase] /QP Source: http://www.microsoft.com/wn3/locales...mailAndPrivacy The above is admittedly from an MS page about using the web-based newsreader and the same caveats /should/ be prominent on pages about using NNTP newsreaders (e.g., http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/...ps/howto.mspx). -- ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear) MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User) Dan wrote: snip WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks PA Bear, but please note: I already know this, now. The issue the
gets me stirred up is that there is not any warning in the help files of OE about setup so that a user knowns this in 'advance' before the problem appears and its already too late. There is no reference to additional info on the web there either. I am aware that this information does exist elseware, but it forces the user to search the net possibly extensively for this info, and during a search, a variety of help pages on this issue neglect to mention this also, including some of Microsoft's own pages such as: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/...ups/howto.mspx Note that this page only says, "enter your email address" which misleads a user to enter a real address, no mention of alternatives. So even a user who attempts to search for additional info may continue thinking no risk exists and end their search there. A user must get lucky to come across the proper info first such as: http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/ou...snewreader.htm which is 3rd party, or: http://www.microsoft.com/wn3/locales...mailAndPrivacy which at first glance appears to be directed at the web based application and might be discounted by those looking for OE info. (Thankyou to Michael Jennings for pointing me to this one also in his recent post.) I know some people don't even read instructions before they do things, but I do. So I, like many others, could not possibly foresee the solution, without any indication that a problem exists in the first place. Some have suggested that it is my fault and I just should have known this, I guess through 'devine' revelation, but I think most understand my point. I also take acception with the fact that an email address is even displayed rather than just a username, as it appears to have absolutely no necessity for the functioning of ng's. I realize that this software was likely written long ago, but probably neglected for upgrade to address the current internet environment. If there is no intention to begin blocking the email address after the username in ng's, I think that at least a patch should be added which will prominently display and warn the user to this risk during setup for ng in OE, or a warning text in the help files for ng setup. And pages on MS's site like the first link example above should be updated. While the real problem is the spammer scum and the gov'ts lack of enacting and enforcing internet protection, a few small actions as noted above could go a long way toward combating at least large part of this problem. Thankyou to you also PA Bear for all the generous help you have provided to users here, you are appreciated. Merry Chrismas, and Happy Holidays to you, Dan "PA Bear" wrote in message ... QP About e-mail addresses and privacy It is highly likely that you will receive unwanted messages (spam) in your regular e-mail account if you use your actual, unmodified e-mail address as your display e-mail address in a discussion group. Note that your display e-mail address is different from your notification e-mail address. Your notification e-mail address must be a real e-mail address in order for you to be notified; it is stored privately by Microsoft. It is not visible to the Community. However, your display e-mail address is public and visible to everyone in the Community. People who send unwanted bulk e-mail (spammers) regularly gather e-mail addresses from discussion groups. To help prevent spam in your regular e-mail account, the default display e-mail address when you post a message in a discussion group is . The following are the display e-mail address options you can choose from: Use a false display e-mail address we generate for you The default address will be used when you post a message if you do not change your display e-mail address. Use a modified display e-mail address Use a different version of your e-mail address that others will understand, but that spam tools can't automatically pick up. For example, if an actual e-mail address were , we would recommend modifying it to one of the following: .(donotspam) _SPAM In this case, the spam tools will send mail to an invalid e-mail address, and others will know to exclude the invalid information when they send you e-mail. Use a secondary e-mail account Set up or use an e-mail account, such as a Hotmail account, that is separate from your primary account for posting to discussion groups. /QP Source: http://www.microsoft.com/wn3/locales...mailAndPrivacy The above is admittedly from an MS page about using the web-based newsreader and the same caveats /should/ be prominent on pages about using NNTP newsreaders (e.g., http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/...ps/howto.mspx). -- ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear) MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User) Dan wrote: snip Let me say that I have found this forum EXTREMELY helpful for solving problems. Bruce Hagen, if he is still around, did an excellent job assisting me. He also alerted me to the fact that my real email address was available to all on this forum, BECAUSE MICROSOFT FAILS TO WARN & INSTRUCT USERS WHEN SETTING UP OUTLOOK EXPRESS TO USE THESE NEWSGROUPS, that you should NOT, I repeat NOT, NOT, NOT enter your real email address... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
viewing Microsoft newsgroups on Outlook Express newsgroups | BoazBoaz | Outlook Express | 11 | September 23rd 06 09:29 PM |
Can you warn before sending to a GAL distribution list ? | [email protected] | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | June 5th 06 04:42 PM |
Access 2000, How can I get the REAL email address? | bobdydd | Outlook - General Queries | 6 | May 5th 06 02:37 AM |
Can Outlook warn if sending with a blank subject line | ulkash | Outlook - General Queries | 4 | February 7th 06 01:55 PM |
Outlook test works but real email gets 530 error | Wizzer | Outlook - Installation | 2 | February 1st 06 04:00 PM |