Steve Cochran wrote:
Hi Peter,

Sorry about the personal attack. I was venting at years of trouble
and got you in the xfire.

I've corresponded with negative results with those who actually work
for that company in the past and also have had some pretty awful
experiences with users. I got the impression you worked for them, so
I let go with both barrels. G

Sorry again.

steve

"Peter" ex-brit AT rogers DOT com wrote in message
...
Go suck a lemon you ape. That's your experience, not mine. By the
way I'm only a volunteer working from home trying (in vain - in your
case you are obviously beyond it) to help people.
People like you make me wonder why anyone helps anyone else at all.

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio

"Steve Cochran" wrote in message
...
Isn't that nice? Maybe you can explain to people why McAfee (and
all the other av and anti-spam vendors) never test your software,
especially since it results in huge message loss and
disfunctionality for OE users over the last 10 years? Or do you
people test it and just dont give a hoot?

I don't think anyone cares that you change to 124.0.0.1, what they
care about is you have screwed up their system with your SUCKY
software over the years giving the Windows client, and especially
OE, users a hideous experience, of which your company has extensive
experience. steve

"Peter" ex-brit AT rogers DOT com wrote in message
...
He talks about his email server changing to 127.0.0.1...this is
normal for Spamkiller as it acts as local host to filter emails
for Spam. I should know I'm a MOD at McAfee Help.

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio

"N. Miller" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:23:22 -0500, Peter wrote:

Guys it has absolutely nothing to do with email scanning and
everything to
do with the Spamkiller application.

Eh? The OP only mentions, "McAfee". AV is just as troublesome as
AS. --
Norman
~Shine, bright morning light,
~now in the air the spring is coming.
~Sweet, blowing wind,
~singing down the hills and valleys.

Too little too late; you've already been identified as a moron w/r to
postings.

"Poprivet" wrote in message
...
Steve Cochran wrote:
Hi Peter,

Sorry about the personal attack. I was venting at years of trouble
and got you in the xfire.

I've corresponded with negative results with those who actually work
for that company in the past and also have had some pretty awful
experiences with users. I got the impression you worked for them, so
I let go with both barrels. G

Sorry again.

steve

"Peter" ex-brit AT rogers DOT com wrote in message
...
Go suck a lemon you ape. That's your experience, not mine. By the
way I'm only a volunteer working from home trying (in vain - in your
case you are obviously beyond it) to help people.
People like you make me wonder why anyone helps anyone else at all.

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio

"Steve Cochran" wrote in message
...
Isn't that nice? Maybe you can explain to people why McAfee (and
all the other av and anti-spam vendors) never test your software,
especially since it results in huge message loss and
disfunctionality for OE users over the last 10 years? Or do you
people test it and just dont give a hoot?

I don't think anyone cares that you change to 124.0.0.1, what they
care about is you have screwed up their system with your SUCKY
software over the years giving the Windows client, and especially
OE, users a hideous experience, of which your company has extensive
experience. steve

"Peter" ex-brit AT rogers DOT com wrote in message
...
He talks about his email server changing to 127.0.0.1...this is
normal for Spamkiller as it acts as local host to filter emails
for Spam. I should know I'm a MOD at McAfee Help.

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio

"N. Miller" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:23:22 -0500, Peter wrote:

Guys it has absolutely nothing to do with email scanning and
everything to
do with the Spamkiller application.

Eh? The OP only mentions, "McAfee". AV is just as troublesome as
AS. --
Norman
~Shine, bright morning light,
~now in the air the spring is coming.
~Sweet, blowing wind,
~singing down the hills and valleys.

Too little too late; you've already been identified as a moron w/r to
postings.



Can't wait to see his reply to this. If it wasn't for Steve, we wouldn't
have answers for many OE problems, as he is responsible for creating
numerous programs to fix OE screw-ups.

OE users owe him big time, (And so does MS).
--
Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP Outlook Express
~IB-CA~

No reply needed. No food for the trolls today. G

steve

"Bruce Hagen" wrote in message
...

"Poprivet" wrote in message
...
Steve Cochran wrote:
Hi Peter,

Sorry about the personal attack. I was venting at years of trouble
and got you in the xfire.

I've corresponded with negative results with those who actually work
for that company in the past and also have had some pretty awful
experiences with users. I got the impression you worked for them, so
I let go with both barrels. G

Sorry again.

steve

"Peter" ex-brit AT rogers DOT com wrote in message
...
Go suck a lemon you ape. That's your experience, not mine. By the
way I'm only a volunteer working from home trying (in vain - in your
case you are obviously beyond it) to help people.
People like you make me wonder why anyone helps anyone else at all.

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio

"Steve Cochran" wrote in message
...
Isn't that nice? Maybe you can explain to people why McAfee (and
all the other av and anti-spam vendors) never test your software,
especially since it results in huge message loss and
disfunctionality for OE users over the last 10 years? Or do you
people test it and just dont give a hoot?

I don't think anyone cares that you change to 124.0.0.1, what they
care about is you have screwed up their system with your SUCKY
software over the years giving the Windows client, and especially
OE, users a hideous experience, of which your company has extensive
experience. steve

"Peter" ex-brit AT rogers DOT com wrote in message
...
He talks about his email server changing to 127.0.0.1...this is
normal for Spamkiller as it acts as local host to filter emails
for Spam. I should know I'm a MOD at McAfee Help.

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio

"N. Miller" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:23:22 -0500, Peter wrote:

Guys it has absolutely nothing to do with email scanning and
everything to
do with the Spamkiller application.

Eh? The OP only mentions, "McAfee". AV is just as troublesome as
AS. --
Norman
~Shine, bright morning light,
~now in the air the spring is coming.
~Sweet, blowing wind,
~singing down the hills and valleys.

Too little too late; you've already been identified as a moron w/r to
postings.



Can't wait to see his reply to this. If it wasn't for Steve, we wouldn't
have answers for many OE problems, as he is responsible for creating
numerous programs to fix OE screw-ups.

OE users owe him big time, (And so does MS).
--
Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP Outlook Express
~IB-CA~