![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just one of the various NewsGroups I monitor regularly reports a number of
unread messages which, when I click on the NG to see what's there, is reduced by the order of 10. This isn't a lot when the reported number of, say, 20 is reduced to 2 but is a lot when the reported number of 300 is reduced to just 30. Does anyone know how this discrepancy arises and why it occurs on only one NG please? Thanks. Bill Ridgeway |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Don't know exactly, but I've got some suggestions to try: .. If not already done, I would suggest that you set the view for unread messages only. (viewcurrent view hide read messages. .. Additionally, depending on your service level, and how your NG subscriptions are organized/grouped, the message counts can be reduced based on repetitive posts in alternate groups. At least this is what occurs on my system. As example, say you subscribe to alt.toys.us and also alt.toys.world If I, as a toy group poster, compose a post and send it to both groups via x-posting. On your subscription pane, you'll see 1 message for each group. However, upon selecting either group for reading, the redundant message(x-posted) may be detected, and the other similar group's message count will be reduced to 0. Usually, this count decrement occurs when you actually select the group. I guess this is supposed to eliminate x-posting messages that I always see folks bitching about? As I said, that's what happens on this system, that I've personally witnessed but.... .. This system is fully updated. .. I load all NG messages via a news server synchronize rather than individual group selection. .. I only retrieve message headers, initially. I'm not one of the guru's present on this group, and I have no technical article reference for information. Just an obs- ervation from a user perspective. The reason I say that it depends on your service level, is that I saw this change activate a long time ago, during some early OE6 updates. Thanks. "Bill Ridgeway" wrote in message ... Just one of the various NewsGroups I monitor regularly reports a number of unread messages which, when I click on the NG to see what's there, is reduced by the order of 10. This isn't a lot when the reported number of, say, 20 is reduced to 2 but is a lot when the reported number of 300 is reduced to just 30. Does anyone know how this discrepancy arises and why it occurs on only one NG please? Thanks. Bill Ridgeway |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Ridgeway" wrote in message
... Just one of the various NewsGroups I monitor regularly reports a number of unread messages which, when I click on the NG to see what's there, is reduced by the order of 10. This isn't a lot when the reported number of, say, 20 is reduced to 2 but is a lot when the reported number of 300 is reduced to just 30. Does anyone know how this discrepancy arises and why it occurs on only one NG please? This news server (and many others) is actually a farm of many servers. Each message in each newsgroup on the server gets a number. OE calculates the number not downloaded by subtracting the highest number it has for the newsgroup from the highest number on the server for that newsgroup, When a server gets out of synchronization with the others it can have different message numbers, leading to the discrepancy. OE then calculates the actual number when it actually downloads the messages and corrects the number of unread. I hope I got that clear, but I'm still on my first cup of coffee for the day. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM Do not send mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for that Frank.
Regards. Bill Ridgeway "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM" wrote in message ... "Bill Ridgeway" wrote in message ... Just one of the various NewsGroups I monitor regularly reports a number of unread messages which, when I click on the NG to see what's there, is reduced by the order of 10. This isn't a lot when the reported number of, say, 20 is reduced to 2 but is a lot when the reported number of 300 is reduced to just 30. Does anyone know how this discrepancy arises and why it occurs on only one NG please? This news server (and many others) is actually a farm of many servers. Each message in each newsgroup on the server gets a number. OE calculates the number not downloaded by subtracting the highest number it has for the newsgroup from the highest number on the server for that newsgroup, When a server gets out of synchronization with the others it can have different message numbers, leading to the discrepancy. OE then calculates the actual number when it actually downloads the messages and corrects the number of unread. I hope I got that clear, but I'm still on my first cup of coffee for the day. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM Do not send mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Ridgeway" schreef in bericht ... Thanks for that Frank. Regards. Bill Ridgeway "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM" wrote in message ... "Bill Ridgeway" wrote in message ... Just one of the various NewsGroups I monitor regularly reports a number of unread messages which, when I click on the NG to see what's there, is reduced by the order of 10. This isn't a lot when the reported number of, say, 20 is reduced to 2 but is a lot when the reported number of 300 is reduced to just 30. Does anyone know how this discrepancy arises and why it occurs on only one NG please? This news server (and many others) is actually a farm of many servers. Each message in each newsgroup on the server gets a number. OE calculates the number not downloaded by subtracting the highest number it has for the newsgroup from the highest number on the server for that newsgroup, When a server gets out of synchronization with the others it can have different message numbers, leading to the discrepancy. OE then calculates the actual number when it actually downloads the messages and corrects the number of unread. I hope I got that clear, but I'm still on my first cup of coffee for the day. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM Do not send mail. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Don't want the unread mail count for Junk Mail or Deleted items. | George Hogge | Outlook - Installation | 3 | April 2nd 07 12:38 AM |
unread mail | A | Outlook - General Queries | 11 | February 14th 07 12:44 AM |
Unread mail on welcome screen | Chocolate Cake | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | February 7th 07 09:12 PM |
Unread mail | TW | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | December 4th 06 09:29 PM |
Unread Mail not seen in Inbox: OWA | Steve W | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | October 14th 06 03:43 AM |