![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have found that in Outlook Express when I view an unread message on an IMAP
account, it will show up as unread again on the next send/receive (giving me the "new mail" indication again as well). In other words, the 'unread' flag is not being changed on the IMAP server. However, I have found that switching to a mailbox on any other account (such as a local folder) after reading the message causes the unread flags to be set properly so I do not get false "new mail" alerts. My question is, is there any way to either: 1. Set OE to automatically change the flags immediately, or at regular intervals; or 2. Set OE to automatically switch to the local inbox after a specified interval, which will force the flags to be updated. The reason this is a problem is that I often forget to change the mailbox, so 5 minutes after reading an email I get the "new mail" alert again (and I am always disappointed!) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew" wrote in message
... I have found that in Outlook Express when I view an unread message on an IMAP account, it will show up as unread again on the next send/receive (giving me the "new mail" indication again as well). In other words, the 'unread' flag is not being changed on the IMAP server. However, I have found that switching to a mailbox on any other account (such as a local folder) after reading the message causes the unread flags to be set properly so I do not get false "new mail" alerts. My question is, is there any way to either: 1. Set OE to automatically change the flags immediately, or at regular intervals; or According to the Help you can use a Synchronize command with IMAP accounts. Have you tried doing that? It may help if you explained more how you download messages, e.g. just via Send/Receive? Also, you could use the troubleshooting log for IMAP to see if OE is doing what you think it should be doing. If so, you may have evidence that the source of your symptom is really in your server and in that case ask your server operator to make changes so that OE's requests are honored. Etc. BTW you may have better luck finding a newsgroup or forum where your particular server is the main focus of discussion. E.g. you are more likely to find knowledgeable comment about both it and OE there than here. Good luck Robert Aldwinckle --- 2. Set OE to automatically switch to the local inbox after a specified interval, which will force the flags to be updated. The reason this is a problem is that I often forget to change the mailbox, so 5 minutes after reading an email I get the "new mail" alert again (and I am always disappointed!) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() According to the Help you can use a Synchronize command with IMAP accounts. Have you tried doing that? Yes, the inbox folder is set to synchronize on send/receive. It may help if you explained more how you download messages, e.g. just via Send/Receive? Yes, I download messages using send/receive. After I read a message (and mark it as read), on the next send/receive the message becomes unread and I get the new mail notification. Also, you could use the troubleshooting log for IMAP to see if OE is doing what you think it should be doing. If so, you may have evidence that the source of your symptom is really in your server and in that case ask your server operator to make changes so that OE's requests are honored. Etc. I have a few pieces of evidence that this is an OE problem. The first clue is that other clients, including Outlook and Thunderbird, do not have the problem with the same server. Another clue is from Princeton's website: "Some e-mail clients set message flags improperly. Outlook Express 5 in IMAP mode does not update message flags (Read, Deleted, etc.) on the server until the program exits. Users of Outlook Express (any version) using IMAP may see read messages revert back to an unread state. This is due to Outlook Express incorrectly using multiple connections to the same mailbox. This is a documented bug with Outlook Express in IMAP mode." (http://helpdesk.princeton.edu/kb/display.plx?ID=3542) I don't go to Princeton or use their server by the way, I just found this with a web search. I took a look at the logs but they don't mean anything to me. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew" wrote in message
... Also, you could use the troubleshooting log for IMAP to see if OE is doing what you think it should be doing. If so, you may have evidence that the source of your symptom is really in your server and in that case ask your server operator to make changes so that OE's requests are honored. Etc. I have a few pieces of evidence that this is an OE problem. The first clue is that other clients, including Outlook and Thunderbird, do not have the problem with the same server. In that case you could refine your symptom description by comparing their traces with OE's. What does OE do or not do differently? Another clue is from Princeton's website: "Some e-mail clients set message flags improperly. Outlook Express 5 in IMAP mode does not update message flags (Read, Deleted, etc.) on the server until the program exits. Users of Outlook Express (any version) using IMAP may see read messages revert back to an unread state. This is due to Outlook Express incorrectly using multiple connections to the same mailbox. This is a documented bug with Outlook Express in IMAP mode." (http://helpdesk.princeton.edu/kb/display.plx?ID=3542) I don't go to Princeton or use their server by the way, I just found this with a web search. I took a look at the logs but they don't mean anything to me. You don't need to understand what you are looking at to compare two supposedly equivalent traces. Also, since you know that OE's support for IMAP is weak perhaps this is just a symptom of that? You could try using OE's successor Windows Live Mail to see if it has improved IMAP support at all. I don't know and can't test, since I don't have any IMAP accounts. Good luck Robert --- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IMAP accounts | Frank | Outlook Express | 2 | September 6th 07 03:53 PM |
set up Exchange and IMAP accounts on one profile | huntqueen | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | February 28th 07 09:21 PM |
Sharing Contacts with IMAP accounts? | Neil | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | December 1st 06 03:48 AM |
Multiple IMAP accounts? | BruceW | Outlook - Installation | 4 | October 21st 06 05:45 AM |