![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMAP is only better than POP3 if you only intend to use mail clients that
are IMAP compatible. Some people prefer to be able to access their email from almost any mail client. That is when POP3 is better. However IMAP allows online (stored on the server) folders. Also most mail clients prefer to delete mail from POP3 servers upon download, when with IMAP they prefer to leave mail on the server until it is deleted in the client. I always use IMAP when available because my email system (Microsoft Exchange 2003) allows both IMAP and POP3 access, which it also allows access through Outlook but I am only talking about IMAP, POP3, and HTTP at the moment. If you don't understand look below: Name: IMAP---POP Folders: Online folders---Inbox only Compatibility: Works in most mail clients---Works in almost all mail clients Lucas "PA Bear" wrote in message ... Define "better" and why "IMAP is better than POP[3]". -- ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear) MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE, Security, Shell/User) lucas wrote: I know IMAP is better than POP, but is HTTP (such as MSN) better than IMAP? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
http mail | Carl G | Outlook Express | 17 | March 4th 06 10:31 PM |
rpc over http | jmiller | Outlook - Installation | 2 | February 5th 06 03:09 PM |
http links in Outlook | MN | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | February 2nd 06 01:04 PM |
Outlook 2003 using HTTP Help Please | Jester9044 | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | January 11th 06 01:06 AM |