|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 6th 09, 05:19 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
|
|||
|
|||
Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan
I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning:
DON'T. (And I have switched mine off as a consequence.) Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes these subjects: QUOTE Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you: - One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity - The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor - Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network bandwidth. UNQUOTE The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor is Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest... Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity." Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a waste of time... DAS -- To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" --- 
|
|
#2
August 6th 09, 05:36 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan
QP
- One fixed price per user /QP There's your answer. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message ... I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning: DON'T. (And I have switched mine off as a consequence.) Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes these subjects: QUOTE Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you: - One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity - The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor - Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network bandwidth. UNQUOTE The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor is Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest... Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity." Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a waste of time... DAS -- To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" ---
|
|
#3
August 6th 09, 05:48 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan
True...
DAS To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" --- "Bruce Hagen" wrote in message ... QP - One fixed price per user /QP There's your answer. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message ... I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning: DON'T. (And I have switched mine off as a consequence.) Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes these subjects: QUOTE Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you: - One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity - The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor - Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network bandwidth. UNQUOTE The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor is Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest... Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity." Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a waste of time... DAS -- To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" ---
|
|
#4
August 6th 09, 06:23 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan
And it slows everything down.
-- I mastered Wordstar graphics! "Dori A Schmetterling" wrote: True... DAS To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" --- "Bruce Hagen" wrote in message ... QP - One fixed price per user /QP There's your answer. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message ... I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning: DON'T. (And I have switched mine off as a consequence.) Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes these subjects: QUOTE Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you: - One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity - The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor - Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network bandwidth. UNQUOTE The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor is Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest... Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity." Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a waste of time... DAS -- To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" ---
|
|
#5
August 7th 09, 02:22 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan
"Corday" wrote in message
And it slows everything down. -- I mastered Wordstar graphics! Long live the WS diamond!
|
|
#6
August 7th 09, 02:22 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan
"Corday" wrote in message And it slows everything down. -- I mastered Wordstar graphics! Long live the WS diamond!
|
|
#7
August 6th 09, 06:23 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan
And it slows everything down.
-- I mastered Wordstar graphics! "Dori A Schmetterling" wrote: True... DAS To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" --- "Bruce Hagen" wrote in message ... QP - One fixed price per user /QP There's your answer. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message ... I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning: DON'T. (And I have switched mine off as a consequence.) Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes these subjects: QUOTE Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you: - One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity - The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor - Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network bandwidth. UNQUOTE The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor is Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest... Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity." Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a waste of time... DAS -- To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" ---
|
|
#8
August 6th 09, 05:48 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan
True...
DAS To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" --- "Bruce Hagen" wrote in message ... QP - One fixed price per user /QP There's your answer. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message ... I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning: DON'T. (And I have switched mine off as a consequence.) Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes these subjects: QUOTE Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you: - One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity - The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor - Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network bandwidth. UNQUOTE The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor is Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest... Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity." Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a waste of time... DAS -- To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" ---
|
|
#9
August 6th 09, 05:36 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan
QP
- One fixed price per user /QP There's your answer. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message ... I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning: DON'T. (And I have switched mine off as a consequence.) Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes these subjects: QUOTE Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you: - One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity - The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor - Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network bandwidth. UNQUOTE The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor is Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest... Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity." Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a waste of time... DAS -- To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling" ---
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scan Pst Log? | its_my_dime | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | November 10th 08 06:09 PM |
| Configuring Outlook to Scan to E-mail | Lacy | Outlook Express | 5 | December 20th 07 02:12 AM |
| card scan | rena212 | Outlook - Using Contacts | 0 | April 5th 07 05:26 PM |
| Scan to E Mail | Ricsec | Outlook - General Queries | 6 | June 11th 06 12:15 AM |
| Scan to E Mail | Ricsec | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | June 8th 06 11:54 PM |
Hybrid Mode
