![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CMM wrote:
Oh, and I'm sorry for the periodic tirade. But, you'd be upset too if your Inbox looked like this every morning: http://www.cmoya.com/temp/scrnshot.htm Yeah, that would be annoying. While Microsoft has addressed with Office 2003 SP2 some of the issues with Outlook's POP engine downloading the same message multiple times, I don't think they've addresses them all and I think some of them (i.e., it's just an opinion with little data to support it) are the result of timing issues from accessing multiple accounts simultaneously during send/receive cycles. My understanding is that Outlook uses multiple threads when there are multiple accounts. I though I read an article to that effect. -- Brian Tillman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure about the multiple accounts as I only have one POP3 account and
an Exchange account and it happens whether I'm connected to Exchange or not. However, I do believe it has to do with rules moving messages to another PST.... which I thought was a problem squashed years and years ago. It's not like the messages are moving to the moon.... the PST is right there in the profile. And it's not like the Server "hanging up" the download should prevent Outlook from saving ID's of messages it has ALREADY downloaded. -- -C. Moya www.cmoya.com "Brian Tillman" wrote in message ... CMM wrote: Oh, and I'm sorry for the periodic tirade. But, you'd be upset too if your Inbox looked like this every morning: http://www.cmoya.com/temp/scrnshot.htm Yeah, that would be annoying. While Microsoft has addressed with Office 2003 SP2 some of the issues with Outlook's POP engine downloading the same message multiple times, I don't think they've addresses them all and I think some of them (i.e., it's just an opinion with little data to support it) are the result of timing issues from accessing multiple accounts simultaneously during send/receive cycles. My understanding is that Outlook uses multiple threads when there are multiple accounts. I though I read an article to that effect. -- Brian Tillman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CMM wrote:
However, I do believe it has to do with rules moving messages to another PST.... which I thought was a problem squashed years and years ago. It's not like the messages are moving to the moon.... the PST is right there in the profile. And it's not like the Server "hanging up" the download should prevent Outlook from saving ID's of messages it has ALREADY downloaded. I don't think rules moving the messages has any bearing on whether or not Outlook remembers what it has downloaded. However, loss of connection during the send/receive cycle does affect that, since empirically it appears that storing the UIDL values is close to the last thing Outlook does in the cycle. Interruption of the cycle for any reason seems to prevent the recording of the UIDL values. -- Brian Tillman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
since empirically it appears that storing the UIDL values is close to the
last thing Outlook does in the cycle. Interruption of the cycle for any reason seems to prevent the recording of the UIDL values. And, there's no reason for that unless someone forgot to add a Try Catch block somewhere since AFAIK Outlook has to retrieve the UIDL's BEFORE it starts to download the messages so it *knows* what id's to save at ANY point during the message retieval process. It just freaks out and forgets to do so. OE does not have this problem and neither does Thunderbird or any other POP3 client on this planet that I have ever used including 15 year old old-school Pine. ;-) Only Outlook. I don't think rules moving the messages has any bearing on whether or not Outlook remembers what it has downloaded. Hmm. Haven't experimented much. But, I think if the message stays in your default Inbox, Outlook "notices" that even sans the UIDL cache and doesn't re-download the message. I might be wrong about that and Outlook is even dumber than I'm giving it credit for. -- -C. Moya www.cmoya.com "Brian Tillman" wrote in message ... CMM wrote: However, I do believe it has to do with rules moving messages to another PST.... which I thought was a problem squashed years and years ago. It's not like the messages are moving to the moon.... the PST is right there in the profile. And it's not like the Server "hanging up" the download should prevent Outlook from saving ID's of messages it has ALREADY downloaded. I don't think rules moving the messages has any bearing on whether or not Outlook remembers what it has downloaded. However, loss of connection during the send/receive cycle does affect that, since empirically it appears that storing the UIDL values is close to the last thing Outlook does in the cycle. Interruption of the cycle for any reason seems to prevent the recording of the UIDL values. -- Brian Tillman |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outlook Address Book Search Bugs | EricM | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | March 15th 06 11:59 PM |
Not Connecting OL2003 but OE Works | Raymond Joseph | Outlook - Installation | 0 | February 19th 06 01:27 AM |
IE7 UI and Bugs | RE66 | Outlook Express | 12 | February 14th 06 06:28 AM |
copy OL2003 contacts | starcarrier | Outlook and VBA | 5 | January 23rd 06 10:30 PM |
OL2000 to OL2003 ? | TimR | Outlook - General Queries | 4 | January 8th 06 07:27 AM |