![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm using Outlook 2003 and I use many rules. Whenever I create a rule I
like to keep them in alphabetical order in the event I have to make change to it. That way the rule is easy to find. My problem is that when I create a rule I have to manually place it in alphabetical order and that can be a little time consuming especially if the rule name begins with the letter "Z" for instance. So I am wondering if anyone knows a way for Outlook 2003 to sort the rules in alphabetical order sans doing it manually. It would save a lot of time. Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No.
-- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After furious head scratching, CJM asked: | I'm using Outlook 2003 and I use many rules. Whenever I create a | rule I like to keep them in alphabetical order in the event I have to | make change to it. That way the rule is easy to find. My problem is | that when I create a rule I have to manually place it in alphabetical | order and that can be a little time consuming especially if the rule | name begins with the letter "Z" for instance. | So I am wondering if anyone knows a way for Outlook 2003 to sort the | rules in alphabetical order sans doing it manually. It would save a | lot of time. Thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CJM wrote:
I'm using Outlook 2003 and I use many rules. Whenever I create a rule I like to keep them in alphabetical order in the event I have to make change to it. Considering that rules execute in a top-down order, that can have unwanted side effects. Rules should be losted in the order in which they need to execute. If the rules are all mutually exclusive, however, and you include the "stop processing more rules" action on each, then it doesn't matter. -- Brian Tillman |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
editing rules | Jim Satterfield | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | February 14th 06 05:01 PM |
Rules Wizard | p | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | February 12th 06 04:16 PM |
Rules | Christian Goeller | Outlook - General Queries | 6 | February 7th 06 12:44 AM |
Repeatin Rules | Sdruws | Outlook - General Queries | 3 | January 31st 06 02:32 AM |
Rules Don't Work | Bob K | Outlook - General Queries | 3 | January 18th 06 05:41 PM |