![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't quite shake the feeling that OL2007 is a minimalist rehash of
what has gone before. To me I'd expect these as absolute minimums in a 2007 email program: - can handle multiple email addresses easily-peasily (eg without crashing) - can handle these with dedicated folders in order to keep mail separate and distinct rather than relying on a bundle if not quite so effective Rules to do so - can handle chat rooms, forums and news groups equally easily-peasily - Calendar handling should make it easy to identify duplication should any arise (especially given that phome, PDA, laptop, workstation, server may have the same (mostly) appointments. Identifying dupes easily whould be a non-demanding operation - orchestrating input/output, import/export from a variety of media should also have a pleasant and unambiguous workflow Bob Buckland ?:-) wrote: Hi CJSNet, Be sure to send your Office 2007 suggestions, comments and feedback on what you do like or what you find difficult to use directly to the MS Office Product team by using the 2007 feedback tool from the link below. The tool allows you to send screenshots and descriptions. Be sure to include information on what having a changed feature would enable you to do better, faster, easier and if it's something you'd use daily, once in awhile, etc. ============== "CJSnet" wrote in message ... "William Lefkovics [MVP]" wrote in message ... You are kidding, right? No, because the two feature suggestions I made are very good ones. You do make a couple of good feature suggestions Thanks, that's all I was trying to do. Next step is to get MS to recognise them. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me I'd expect these as absolute minimums in a 2007 email program:
- can handle multiple email addresses easily-peasily (eg without crashing) Sure it can. It's a beta version though so crashes are to be expected. - can handle these with dedicated folders in order to keep mail separate and distinct rather than relying on a bundle if not quite so effective Rules to do so Rules generally work - can handle chat rooms, forums and news groups equally easily-peasily Outlook is targeted at business customers with Exchange server. No need for chat rooms, forums and news groups for those, especially because you can get a lot of that functionality with other MS products that integrate into Outlook, but with strict corporate control. - Calendar handling should make it easy to identify duplication should any arise (especially given that phome, PDA, laptop, workstation, server may have the same (mostly) appointments. Identifying dupes easily whould be a non-demanding operation Use the send a smile tool to submit this as suggestion. - orchestrating input/output, import/export from a variety of media should also have a pleasant and unambiguous workflow Like what media? Patrick Schmid -------------- http://pschmid.net Bob Buckland ?:-) wrote: Hi CJSNet, Be sure to send your Office 2007 suggestions, comments and feedback on what you do like or what you find difficult to use directly to the MS Office Product team by using the 2007 feedback tool from the link below. The tool allows you to send screenshots and descriptions. Be sure to include information on what having a changed feature would enable you to do better, faster, easier and if it's something you'd use daily, once in awhile, etc. ============== "CJSnet" wrote in message ... "William Lefkovics [MVP]" wrote in message ... You are kidding, right? No, because the two feature suggestions I made are very good ones. You do make a couple of good feature suggestions Thanks, that's all I was trying to do. Next step is to get MS to recognise them. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"deebs" wrote in message
... I can't quite shake the feeling that OL2007 is a minimalist rehash of what has gone before. Sorry to say I agree. To me I'd expect these as absolute minimums in a 2007 email program: .... - can handle these with dedicated folders in order to keep mail separate and distinct rather than relying on a bundle if not quite so effective Rules to do so Hear hear! Bob Buckland ?:-) wrote: Hi CJSNet, Be sure to send your Office 2007 suggestions, comments and feedback on what you do like or what you find difficult to use directly to the MS Office Product team by using the 2007 feedback tool from the link below. The tool allows you to send screenshots and descriptions. Be sure to include information on what having a changed feature would enable you to do better, faster, easier and if it's something you'd use daily, once in awhile, etc. ============== "CJSnet" wrote in message ... "William Lefkovics [MVP]" wrote in message ... You are kidding, right? No, because the two feature suggestions I made are very good ones. You do make a couple of good feature suggestions Thanks, that's all I was trying to do. Next step is to get MS to recognise them. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
deebs wrote:
To me I'd expect these as absolute minimums in a 2007 email program: - can handle multiple email addresses easily-peasily (eg without crashing) Once OL 2007 is in production release it will be at least as reliable as priot Outlooks. My Outlook installations handle four or five separate accounts with never a crash. - can handle these with dedicated folders in order to keep mail separate and distinct rather than relying on a bundle if not quite so effective Rules to do so Rules are quite effective. - can handle chat rooms, forums and news groups equally easily-peasily Not in a business environment. This is a bad idea. Outlook is already a large program. Let's not introduce additional areas where things can go wrong. - Calendar handling should make it easy to identify duplication should any arise (especially given that phome, PDA, laptop, workstation, server may have the same (mostly) appointments. Identifying dupes easily whould be a non-demanding operation I get a duplicate in my calendar maybe once or twice a year, despite syncing with multiple devices. When I do, it's nearly trivial to correct the problem. - orchestrating input/output, import/export from a variety of media should also have a pleasant and unambiguous workflow Unless absolutely necessary, import and export should be avoided. -- Brian Tillman |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RPC over HTTPS on Vista and OL2007 not working | Eric20817 | Outlook - Installation | 7 | September 26th 06 08:36 PM |
Issues after uninstalling OL2007. | kp | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | June 15th 06 03:45 PM |
RSS feeds not updating (OL2007) | Gordon Wheeler | Outlook - General Queries | 9 | June 12th 06 11:33 PM |
Rule to Forward Incoming Mail Fails when item is itself a replied-to or forwarded e-mail | Steven Bookman | Outlook - General Queries | 3 | April 6th 06 10:41 PM |
Can't send test e-mail in set up of outlook xp google acct | greg | Outlook - Installation | 3 | March 6th 06 09:57 PM |