![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Presently you can't redirect mail using rules in Outlook 2003 without
an Exchange Server. Is this fixed with 2007? -- Lew |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fixed? It doesn't sound broken.
What do you mean by 'redirect'? "Lew" wrote in message . 3.64... Presently you can't redirect mail using rules in Outlook 2003 without an Exchange Server. Is this fixed with 2007? -- Lew |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MVP?
From Webopedia: "(1) In e-mail, a redirect is an option found in e- mail clients that is similar to a forward, with the exception that the body of the text is not normally shown as quoted text. Additionally the From (or) Sender field will show the e-mail address of the original sender, and in brackets it will show your information." From Microsoft’s web page concerning “automatically forwarding emails to another email account” (http://office.microsoft.com/en- us/assistance/HA011502011033.aspx): "* Message redirection**When a rule automatically redirects a message you receive, it also leaves a copy in your Inbox or in the folder to which the message was originally delivered. The rule then sends the message, unchanged, to the account specified by the rule. To the recipient, the message appears as though it came directly from the original sender. There is no indication that the message was delivered by way of your account." My customer wants to filter his emails using Outlook 2003, then automatically redirect them to his Blackberry. If you don't have an Exchange Server (he doesn't), you don't have that option. This option is readily available on other email clients (Eudora, Thunderbird), but my customer likes Outlook. My question was whether Outlook 2007 has added (fixed?) this option in response to requests. Judging by all the addins for sale, there is a need. -- Lew On 09 Jul 2006, William Lefkovics [MVP] wrote in Fixed? It doesn't sound broken. What do you mean by 'redirect'? "Lew" wrote in message . 3.64... Presently you can't redirect mail using rules in Outlook 2003 without an Exchange Server. Is this fixed with 2007? -- Lew |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Taking a look at Outlook 2007:
I can create a rule that forwards a message to someone else automatically with my IMAP/SMTP setup. When I do so, the message is automatically forwarded, but it is clearly marked as a forward (FW: in front, etc). So I guess a clean redirect like you are looking for doesn't exist in 2007. Patrick Schmid -------------- http://pschmid.net "Lew" wrote in message . 3.64: MVP? From Webopedia: "(1) In e-mail, a redirect is an option found in e- mail clients that is similar to a forward, with the exception that the body of the text is not normally shown as quoted text. Additionally the From (or) Sender field will show the e-mail address of the original sender, and in brackets it will show your information." From Microsoft’s web page concerning “automatically forwarding emails to another email account” (http://office.microsoft.com/en- us/assistance/HA011502011033.aspx): "* Message redirection**When a rule automatically redirects a message you receive, it also leaves a copy in your Inbox or in the folder to which the message was originally delivered. The rule then sends the message, unchanged, to the account specified by the rule. To the recipient, the message appears as though it came directly from the original sender. There is no indication that the message was delivered by way of your account." My customer wants to filter his emails using Outlook 2003, then automatically redirect them to his Blackberry. If you don't have an Exchange Server (he doesn't), you don't have that option. This option is readily available on other email clients (Eudora, Thunderbird), but my customer likes Outlook. My question was whether Outlook 2007 has added (fixed?) this option in response to requests. Judging by all the addins for sale, there is a need. -- Lew On 09 Jul 2006, William Lefkovics [MVP] wrote in Fixed? It doesn't sound broken. What do you mean by 'redirect'? "Lew" wrote in message . 3.64... Presently you can't redirect mail using rules in Outlook 2003 without an Exchange Server. Is this fixed with 2007? -- Lew |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, Exchange MVP until October.
I wanted *your* definition of 'redirect', as I have seen dozens of them over the years. To me, it is typically it is a server-side concept; that is, a client should not be necessary. I would login to my ISP account and implement such a rule there in 'lew' of using Outlook. Sure, many email clients have such a feature. I don't believe Outlook 2007 (as of beta 2) is one of them. "Lew" wrote in message . 3.64... MVP? From Webopedia: "(1) In e-mail, a redirect is an option found in e- mail clients that is similar to a forward, with the exception that the body of the text is not normally shown as quoted text. Additionally the From (or) Sender field will show the e-mail address of the original sender, and in brackets it will show your information." From Microsoft's web page concerning "automatically forwarding emails to another email account" (http://office.microsoft.com/en- us/assistance/HA011502011033.aspx): "* Message redirection When a rule automatically redirects a message you receive, it also leaves a copy in your Inbox or in the folder to which the message was originally delivered. The rule then sends the message, unchanged, to the account specified by the rule. To the recipient, the message appears as though it came directly from the original sender. There is no indication that the message was delivered by way of your account." My customer wants to filter his emails using Outlook 2003, then automatically redirect them to his Blackberry. If you don't have an Exchange Server (he doesn't), you don't have that option. This option is readily available on other email clients (Eudora, Thunderbird), but my customer likes Outlook. My question was whether Outlook 2007 has added (fixed?) this option in response to requests. Judging by all the addins for sale, there is a need. -- Lew On 09 Jul 2006, William Lefkovics [MVP] wrote in Fixed? It doesn't sound broken. What do you mean by 'redirect'? "Lew" wrote in message . 3.64... Presently you can't redirect mail using rules in Outlook 2003 without an Exchange Server. Is this fixed with 2007? -- Lew |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately, a server-side redirect would not use Outlook's rules
and junk filter. Thanks for the answer. I'll have to find an alternative solution. -- Lew On 10 Jul 2006, William Lefkovics [MVP] wrote in Yes, Exchange MVP until October. I wanted *your* definition of 'redirect', as I have seen dozens of them over the years. To me, it is typically it is a server-side concept; that is, a client should not be necessary. I would login to my ISP account and implement such a rule there in 'lew' of using Outlook. Sure, many email clients have such a feature. I don't believe Outlook 2007 (as of beta 2) is one of them. snip |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jul 2006, Patrick Schmid wrote in
Taking a look at Outlook 2007: I can create a rule that forwards a message to someone else automatically with my IMAP/SMTP setup. When I do so, the message is automatically forwarded, but it is clearly marked as a forward (FW: in front, etc). So I guess a clean redirect like you are looking for doesn't exist in 2007. Patrick Schmid -------------- http://pschmid.net "Lew" wrote in message . 3.64: MVP? From Webopedia: "(1) In e-mail, a redirect is an option found in e- mail clients that is similar to a forward, with the exception that the body of the text is not normally shown as quoted text. Additionally the From (or) Sender field will show the e-mail address of the original sender, and in brackets it will show your information." From Microsoft’s web page concerning “automatically forwarding emails to another email account” (http://office.microsoft.com/en- us/assistance/HA011502011033.aspx): "* Message redirection**When a rule automatically redirects a message you receive, it also leaves a copy in your Inbox or in the folder to which the message was originally delivered. The rule then sends the message, unchanged, to the account specified by the rule. To the recipient, the message appears as though it came directly from the original sender. There is no indication that the message was delivered by way of your account." My customer wants to filter his emails using Outlook 2003, then automatically redirect them to his Blackberry. If you don't have an Exchange Server (he doesn't), you don't have that option. This option is readily available on other email clients (Eudora, Thunderbird), but my customer likes Outlook. My question was whether Outlook 2007 has added (fixed?) this option in response to requests. Judging by all the addins for sale, there is a need. -- Lew On 09 Jul 2006, William Lefkovics [MVP] wrote in Fixed? It doesn't sound broken. What do you mean by 'redirect'? "Lew" wrote in message . 3.64... Presently you can't redirect mail using rules in Outlook 2003 without an Exchange Server. Is this fixed with 2007? -- Lew Thanks -- Lew |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Redirect email from Sent folder | Christine | Outlook and VBA | 6 | May 4th 06 06:34 PM |
Setup email account as resource in exchange - redirect stuffing up | [email protected] | Outlook - Calandaring | 2 | March 31st 06 02:05 AM |
Redirect mail to another computor on LAN | Birilac | Outlook Express | 6 | February 20th 06 04:28 PM |
Filtering Rule in Outlook2003 : how to redirect acknowledgements into ad hoc directory (sorry for the previous msg in html) | [Ben] | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | January 12th 06 12:03 PM |
Filtering Rule in Outlook 2003 : how to redirect acknowledgements into ad hoc directory ? | [Ben] | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | January 12th 06 12:00 PM |