I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just wondering
if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program that would allow
Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a customer with one user in their
office using Outlook 2003 and all the others still using Outlook 2000.
They are also using Microsoft Mail for inte-office e-mail and would like, if
possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft Mail as well.

Thanks.

Sam

http://www.outlook-tips.net/howto/msmail.htm should help.

--�
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, Sam Rodar asked:

| I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just
| wondering if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program that
| would allow Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a customer with
| one user in their office using Outlook 2003 and all the others still
| using Outlook 2000.
| They are also using Microsoft Mail for inte-office e-mail and would
| like, if possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft Mail
| as well.
|
| Thanks.
|
| Sam

Thanks Milly. That looks like it will work. Will post back if I have any
problems

Sam

"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
wrote in message
...
http://www.outlook-tips.net/howto/msmail.htm should help.

--�
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, Sam Rodar asked:

| I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just
| wondering if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program that
| would allow Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a customer with
| one user in their office using Outlook 2003 and all the others still
| using Outlook 2000.
| They are also using Microsoft Mail for inte-office e-mail and would
| like, if possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft Mail
| as well.
|
| Thanks.
|
| Sam

In ,
Sam Rodar typed:
I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just
wondering if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program that
would allow Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a customer with
one user in their office using Outlook 2003 and all the others still
using Outlook 2000. They are also using Microsoft Mail for inte-office
e-mail and would
like, if possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft Mail
as well.
Thanks.

Sam

In addition to Milly's reply, I don't know what your line of business is,
but if it's at all in the IT way, note that you might do this customer a
great service if you were to gently suggest that they stop using archaic,
unsupported technology for something as important as e-mail. If they are a
small shop, Small Business Server 2003 might be a very good fit for them. If
I were to go into a shop still relying on OL2000 and MS Mail, the first
thing I'd do is write up a proposal to get rid of both!

My organization (government agency) still uses NT 4 servers and probably
will for some time to come.

If it works for them, let them continue to use it. Just because something
is archaic and unsupported is not a reason to automatically upgrade.

--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] asked:

| In ,
| Sam Rodar typed:
|| I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just
|| wondering if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program that
|| would allow Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a customer with
|| one user in their office using Outlook 2003 and all the others still
|| using Outlook 2000. They are also using Microsoft Mail for
|| inte-office e-mail and would
|| like, if possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft Mail
|| as well.
|| Thanks.
||
|| Sam
|
| In addition to Milly's reply, I don't know what your line of business
| is, but if it's at all in the IT way, note that you might do this
| customer a great service if you were to gently suggest that they stop
| using archaic, unsupported technology for something as important as
| e-mail. If they are a small shop, Small Business Server 2003 might be
| a very good fit for them. If I were to go into a shop still relying
| on OL2000 and MS Mail, the first thing I'd do is write up a proposal
| to get rid of both!

In ,
Milly Staples - MVP Outlook
typed:
My organization (government agency) still uses NT 4 servers and
probably will for some time to come.

If it works for them, let them continue to use it. Just because
something is archaic and unsupported is not a reason to automatically
upgrade.

I don't think that's a reasonable analogy. MS Mail was cruddy when it *was*
supported....and I suspect there are reasons that a gov't agency might not
upgrade (scope of project, and red tape) that likely don't apply to a small
business, even one on a limited budget. I also imagine that a government
agency has a teensy bit more skilled tech/engineering support available to
it on a fulltime basis, than does a mom & pop operation.

And no, I don't think SBS will work
for you, Milly. ;-)




In ,
Sam Rodar typed:
I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just
wondering if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program
that would allow Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a customer
with one user in their office using Outlook 2003 and all the others
still using Outlook 2000. They are also using Microsoft Mail for
inte-office e-mail and would
like, if possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft Mail
as well.
Thanks.

Sam

In addition to Milly's reply, I don't know what your line of business
is, but if it's at all in the IT way, note that you might do this
customer a great service if you were to gently suggest that they stop
using archaic, unsupported technology for something as important as
e-mail. If they are a small shop, Small Business Server 2003 might be
a very good fit for them. If I were to go into a shop still relying
on OL2000 and MS Mail, the first thing I'd do is write up a proposal
to get rid of both!

"I also imagine that a government agency has a teensy bit more skilled tech/engineering support available to it on a fulltime basis, than does a mom & pop operation."

Please don't let Neo see this from you - I can hear the laughter already!

--�
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] asked:

| In ,
| Milly Staples - MVP Outlook
| typed:
|| My organization (government agency) still uses NT 4 servers and
|| probably will for some time to come.
||
|| If it works for them, let them continue to use it. Just because
|| something is archaic and unsupported is not a reason to automatically
|| upgrade.
|
| I don't think that's a reasonable analogy. MS Mail was cruddy when it
| *was* supported....and I suspect there are reasons that a gov't
| agency might not upgrade (scope of project, and red tape) that likely
| don't apply to a small business, even one on a limited budget. I also
| imagine that a government agency has a teensy bit more skilled
| tech/engineering support available to it on a fulltime basis, than
| does a mom & pop operation.
|
| And no, I don't think SBS will work
| for you, Milly. ;-)
|
|
||
||
||| In ,
||| Sam Rodar typed:
|||| I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just
|||| wondering if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program
|||| that would allow Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a customer
|||| with one user in their office using Outlook 2003 and all the others
|||| still using Outlook 2000. They are also using Microsoft Mail for
|||| inte-office e-mail and would
|||| like, if possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft
|||| Mail as well.
|||| Thanks.
||||
|||| Sam
|||
||| In addition to Milly's reply, I don't know what your line of
||| business is, but if it's at all in the IT way, note that you might
||| do this customer a great service if you were to gently suggest that
||| they stop using archaic, unsupported technology for something as
||| important as e-mail. If they are a small shop, Small Business
||| Server 2003 might be a very good fit for them. If I were to go into
||| a shop still relying on OL2000 and MS Mail, the first thing I'd do
||| is write up a proposal to get rid of both!

In ,
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
typed:
"I also imagine that a government agency has a teensy bit more
skilled tech/engineering support available to it on a fulltime basis,
than does a mom & pop operation."

Please don't let Neo see this from you - I can hear the laughter
already!

OK, OK, "warm bodies," then!


--�
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] asked:

In ,
Milly Staples - MVP Outlook
typed:
My organization (government agency) still uses NT 4 servers and
probably will for some time to come.

If it works for them, let them continue to use it. Just because
something is archaic and unsupported is not a reason to
automatically upgrade.

I don't think that's a reasonable analogy. MS Mail was cruddy when it
*was* supported....and I suspect there are reasons that a gov't
agency might not upgrade (scope of project, and red tape) that likely
don't apply to a small business, even one on a limited budget. I also
imagine that a government agency has a teensy bit more skilled
tech/engineering support available to it on a fulltime basis, than
does a mom & pop operation.

And no, I don't think SBS will work
for you, Milly. ;-)




In ,
Sam Rodar typed:
I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just
wondering if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program
that would allow Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a customer
with one user in their office using Outlook 2003 and all the
others still using Outlook 2000. They are also using Microsoft
Mail for inte-office e-mail and would
like, if possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft
Mail as well.
Thanks.

Sam

In addition to Milly's reply, I don't know what your line of
business is, but if it's at all in the IT way, note that you might
do this customer a great service if you were to gently suggest that
they stop using archaic, unsupported technology for something as
important as e-mail. If they are a small shop, Small Business
Server 2003 might be a very good fit for them. If I were to go into
a shop still relying on OL2000 and MS Mail, the first thing I'd do
is write up a proposal to get rid of both!

Nah, just drop the "skilled"!

--�
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] asked:

| In ,
| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
| typed:
|| "I also imagine that a government agency has a teensy bit more
|| skilled tech/engineering support available to it on a fulltime basis,
|| than does a mom & pop operation."
||
|| Please don't let Neo see this from you - I can hear the laughter
|| already!
|
| OK, OK, "warm bodies," then!
|
||
|| --�
|| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
||
|| Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
|| unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
|| reading.
||
|| After furious head scratching, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] asked:
||
||| In ,
||| Milly Staples - MVP Outlook
||| typed:
|||| My organization (government agency) still uses NT 4 servers and
|||| probably will for some time to come.
||||
|||| If it works for them, let them continue to use it. Just because
|||| something is archaic and unsupported is not a reason to
|||| automatically upgrade.
|||
||| I don't think that's a reasonable analogy. MS Mail was cruddy when
||| it *was* supported....and I suspect there are reasons that a gov't
||| agency might not upgrade (scope of project, and red tape) that
||| likely don't apply to a small business, even one on a limited
||| budget. I also imagine that a government agency has a teensy bit
||| more skilled tech/engineering support available to it on a fulltime
||| basis, than does a mom & pop operation.
|||
||| And no, I don't think SBS will work
||| for you, Milly. ;-)
|||
|||
||||
||||
||||| In ,
||||| Sam Rodar typed:
|||||| I know that Outlook 2003 does not work with Microsoft Mail. Just
|||||| wondering if anyone knows of a workaround or third party program
|||||| that would allow Outlook 2003 to work with Mail? I have a
|||||| customer with one user in their office using Outlook 2003 and
|||||| all the others still using Outlook 2000. They are also using
|||||| Microsoft Mail for inte-office e-mail and would
|||||| like, if possible, for the upgraded user to still use Microsoft
|||||| Mail as well.
|||||| Thanks.
||||||
|||||| Sam
|||||
||||| In addition to Milly's reply, I don't know what your line of
||||| business is, but if it's at all in the IT way, note that you might
||||| do this customer a great service if you were to gently suggest
||||| that they stop using archaic, unsupported technology for
||||| something as important as e-mail. If they are a small shop, Small
||||| Business Server 2003 might be a very good fit for them. If I were
||||| to go into a shop still relying on OL2000 and MS Mail, the first
||||| thing I'd do is write up a proposal to get rid of both!