![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out
junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go into the junk email folder and losing them? Thanks, Scott |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In oups.com,
Uncle Scotty typed: I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go into the junk email folder and losing them? Thanks, Scott You can't....with every increase in your spam detection, there is an increase in the possibility of "false positives". I suggest you regularly empty out the junk email folder so that the 'unread message' notification is useful information to you - but you should check for false positives & whitelist them before purging the folder, of course. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What do you mean by whitelist? And, how does emptying out junk mail
make the 'unread message' notification useful information to me? Thanks again, Scott Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote: In oups.com, Uncle Scotty typed: I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go into the junk email folder and losing them? Thanks, Scott You can't....with every increase in your spam detection, there is an increase in the possibility of "false positives". I suggest you regularly empty out the junk email folder so that the 'unread message' notification is useful information to you - but you should check for false positives & whitelist them before purging the folder, of course. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In ups.com,
Uncle Scotty typed: What do you mean by whitelist? When you see a valid message that was put in the junk e-mail folder, and you click Not Junk.... And, how does emptying out junk mail make the 'unread message' notification useful information to me? Because it will be an easy reminder for you to look at the new mail, to see if you need to whitelist it. Thanks again, Scott Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote: In oups.com, Uncle Scotty typed: I want to make outlook more discriminating in terms of filtering out junk emails. Under Actions-Junk Emails, I can set the filter from low to high, but how do you do this without having some good emails go into the junk email folder and losing them? Thanks, Scott You can't....with every increase in your spam detection, there is an increase in the possibility of "false positives". I suggest you regularly empty out the junk email folder so that the 'unread message' notification is useful information to you - but you should check for false positives & whitelist them before purging the folder, of course. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
junk mail - Outlook 2003 rule to mark as junk any email with only | Steve_Wood | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | August 3rd 06 09:56 PM |
OL 2003, All users filtering Public Folder for Junk | Ben | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | April 21st 06 10:22 AM |
Junk email is enabled but not filtering any spam | Mikez | Outlook - Installation | 0 | March 14th 06 02:53 PM |
Spamkiller vs. Office 3000 junk mail filtering | hookemhorns | Outlook - General Queries | 12 | February 21st 06 10:08 AM |
Outlook junk mail filter NOT filtering | moderntymes | Outlook - Installation | 3 | February 1st 06 04:03 PM |