![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi!
I run a Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 SP2 with Public Folders. The Public Folders only contain Adress Books, nested in other address books (kind of sub-folders in folders). They are visible as such in the Microsoft Outlook 2003 SP2 client on the user desktop. My issue is that the end user can't make an advanced search (or event a simple one) in ALL the address books at once: he or she can only search in one address book at a time, which is not useful since he or she doesn't know in which sub-folder the contact is. If he tries to make a "global" search, the Outlook client just sends a warning saying that you need to check only one address book at a time. Any idea? Help appreciated Nicolas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In ,
Nicolas Macarez typed: Hi! I run a Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 SP2 with Public Folders. The Public Folders only contain Adress Books, nested in other address books (kind of sub-folders in folders). They are visible as such in the Microsoft Outlook 2003 SP2 client on the user desktop. My issue is that the end user can't make an advanced search (or event a simple one) in ALL the address books at once: he or she can only search in one address book at a time, which is not useful since he or she doesn't know in which sub-folder the contact is. If he tries to make a "global" search, the Outlook client just sends a warning saying that you need to check only one address book at a time. Any idea? Help appreciated Nicolas That's the way it is, alas. I personally recommend keeping as few folders as you can get away with, particularly where Contacts are concerned. Categories can make it easier to organize a bunch of contacts in a single folder.... Google Desktop Search can do Outlook searching - or look for LookOut. They may do better. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, but that's too bad....
- I'll try LoukOut: (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...35ee-16e5-4961 -91b8-2200ba31ea37&DisplayLang=en) I'm afraid Google Desktop mail slow down the PCs... though it's a great product... Nicolas "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" ahoo.com wrote in message ... In , Nicolas Macarez typed: Hi! I run a Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 SP2 with Public Folders. The Public Folders only contain Adress Books, nested in other address books (kind of sub-folders in folders). They are visible as such in the Microsoft Outlook 2003 SP2 client on the user desktop. My issue is that the end user can't make an advanced search (or event a simple one) in ALL the address books at once: he or she can only search in one address book at a time, which is not useful since he or she doesn't know in which sub-folder the contact is. If he tries to make a "global" search, the Outlook client just sends a warning saying that you need to check only one address book at a time. Any idea? Help appreciated Nicolas That's the way it is, alas. I personally recommend keeping as few folders as you can get away with, particularly where Contacts are concerned. Categories can make it easier to organize a bunch of contacts in a single folder.... Google Desktop Search can do Outlook searching - or look for LookOut. They may do better. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LookOut will be able to search multiple address books like you want.
Oliver "Nicolas Macarez" wrote in message ... Thanks, but that's too bad.... - I'll try LoukOut: (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...35ee-16e5-4961 -91b8-2200ba31ea37&DisplayLang=en) I'm afraid Google Desktop mail slow down the PCs... though it's a great product... Nicolas "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" ahoo.com wrote in message ... In , Nicolas Macarez typed: Hi! I run a Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 SP2 with Public Folders. The Public Folders only contain Adress Books, nested in other address books (kind of sub-folders in folders). They are visible as such in the Microsoft Outlook 2003 SP2 client on the user desktop. My issue is that the end user can't make an advanced search (or event a simple one) in ALL the address books at once: he or she can only search in one address book at a time, which is not useful since he or she doesn't know in which sub-folder the contact is. If he tries to make a "global" search, the Outlook client just sends a warning saying that you need to check only one address book at a time. Any idea? Help appreciated Nicolas That's the way it is, alas. I personally recommend keeping as few folders as you can get away with, particularly where Contacts are concerned. Categories can make it easier to organize a bunch of contacts in a single folder.... Google Desktop Search can do Outlook searching - or look for LookOut. They may do better. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OL2k3 Automatically Adding Public Folders to 'Favorite Folders' list in Mail | Ben | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | October 4th 06 05:19 PM |
Is there a way to display Public Folders in the All Mail Folders view? Outlook2003 | Cappy | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | July 20th 06 03:20 AM |
Is there a way to display Public Folders in the All Mail Folders view? Outlook2003 | Cappy | Outlook - Installation | 1 | July 20th 06 03:20 AM |
Public Folders - Search Subfolders is Greyed Out | Chris Briant | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | July 19th 06 04:59 PM |
Hide/Delete Deleted Items & Search Folders Folders in Outlook 2003 | jpspringall | Outlook and VBA | 1 | April 24th 06 03:51 PM |