![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I set up Outlook 2003 SP2 (11.8010.6568) to use my IMAP account. I created the following rules to run on IMAP account: Rule A - move message from sender A to email subfolder A of personal folder Rule B - move message from sender B to email subfolder B of personal folder Rule C - move any message to Inbox of personal folder This is what I get: Rule A moves message from sender A to subfolder A (personal folder) Rule B moves message from sender B to subfolder B (personal folder) Rule C moves any other message to Inbox (personal folder) plus messages from sender A and B What options do I have to avoid that the messages that have allready been processed by Rule A and B will again be processed by Rule C? Are the rules run in any specific order? Appreciate any help. Thanks in advance, Bodo |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bodo 1 wrote:
Hi, I set up Outlook 2003 SP2 (11.8010.6568) to use my IMAP account. I created the following rules to run on IMAP account: Rule A - move message from sender A to email subfolder A of personal folder Rule B - move message from sender B to email subfolder B of personal folder Rule C - move any message to Inbox of personal folder This is what I get: Rule A moves message from sender A to subfolder A (personal folder) Rule B moves message from sender B to subfolder B (personal folder) Rule C moves any other message to Inbox (personal folder) plus messages from sender A and B What options do I have to avoid that the messages that have allready been processed by Rule A and B will again be processed by Rule C? Are the rules run in any specific order? Rules are run top to bottom. However, you neglected to include the "stop proocessing more rules" action on the first two rules. Because for any given message, rule A and C or B and C might apply, Outlook retains a copy in the Inbox until all rules are processed, thereby producing what you see. By including the "stop processing" action, you tell Outlook that no subsequent rule is to be included, so Outlook knows it can safely delete the original after moving a copy. -- Brian Tillman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian Tillman" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Rules are run top to bottom. However, you neglected to include the "stop proocessing more rules" action on the first two rules. Because for any given message, rule A and C or B and C might apply, Outlook retains a copy in the Inbox until all rules are processed, thereby producing what you see. By including the "stop processing" action, you tell Outlook that no subsequent rule is to be included, so Outlook knows it can safely delete the original after moving a copy. -- Brian Tillman Hi Brian, thanks, that works great! Regards, Bodo |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OL2003 - Move read IMAP messages | PeterR | Outlook and VBA | 1 | January 15th 07 03:53 PM |
IMAP + POP3 account | Alberto | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | September 30th 06 09:22 PM |
Rules wizard set up for rule | enh | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | September 8th 06 09:38 PM |
wizard sets up outlook extra account but it fails to work | Peter | Outlook - General Queries | 6 | June 7th 06 04:16 PM |
Setting up an IMAP account | Crockett | Outlook - Installation | 14 | May 30th 06 03:01 PM |