![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a specified
account it should be perminently deleted. This is actually the third of three rules which is designed to deleted all spam, i.e. I am catching valid mail with the first two rules and anything that fails those tests should be perminently deleted. However when such an Email arrives, a warning box appears advising that I dod not have permission to carry out this action! The rule is then automatically disabled, until I enable it and the whole process starts again. With the rule disabled offending Emails reach my Indox. If I then run the run on my inbox the messages are then perminantly deleted without any issue. Can anyone explain this? Why do I not have the necessary perminssion when I am recieving the Emails, but once I have got them all is well and they can be perminently deleted. PWS |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete wrote:
I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a specified account it should be perminently deleted. This is actually the third of three rules which is designed to deleted all spam, i.e. I am catching valid mail with the first two rules and anything that fails those tests should be perminently deleted. However when such an Email arrives, a warning box appears advising that I dod not have permission to carry out this action! The rule is then automatically disabled, until I enable it and the whole process starts again. With the rule disabled offending Emails reach my Indox. If I then run the run on my inbox the messages are then perminantly deleted without any issue. Can anyone explain this? Why do I not have the necessary perminssion when I am recieving the Emails, but once I have got them all is well and they can be perminently deleted. PWS That's a dangerous way of doing it. You can GUARANTEE that at some point, a valid email that you ought to have read will be permanently deleted. Then there's not even any way of knowing that you even received it. Change the rule to just "delete" and not "permanently delete". trust me on this! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 19, 12:51 pm, Gordon wrote:
Pete wrote: I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a specified account it should be perminently deleted. This is actually the third of three rules which is designed to deleted all spam, i.e. I am catching valid mail with the first two rules and anything that fails those tests should be perminently deleted. However when such an Email arrives, a warning box appears advising that I dod not have permission to carry out this action! The rule is then automatically disabled, until I enable it and the whole process starts again. With the rule disabled offending Emails reach my Indox. If I then run the run on my inbox the messages are then perminantly deleted without any issue. Can anyone explain this? Why do I not have the necessary perminssion when I am recieving the Emails, but once I have got them all is well and they can be perminently deleted. PWS That's a dangerous way of doing it. You can GUARANTEE that at some point, a valid email that you ought to have read will be permanently deleted. Then there's not even any way of knowing that you even received it. Change the rule to just "delete" and not "permanently delete". trust me on this!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I would ask you to let me be the judge of what I want to do, and not to offer your advice on what you think I should do. I believe my multiple posts, for which I apologise for, as well actually enetering this particular thread (yes I have to use google from work) asked a specific question. Why am I being told i do not have permission to permanently delete when mail enters my Inbox from downloading, but i can run the rule on my inbox manually and it works fine. PWS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(outlook 2003) office word 2003 wont be set as default editor | Jason | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | January 16th 07 05:37 AM |
Outlook 2003: microsoft office outlook 2003 does not recognize fax numbers | SteveMc | Outlook - General Queries | 4 | December 20th 06 11:38 PM |
Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003/Outlook 2007 combination creates duplicate folders | [email protected] | Outlook - General Queries | 3 | December 5th 06 05:32 PM |
free / busy data in schedule - Outlook 2003 | Exchqange 2003 | Matt Conlon | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | May 1st 06 08:21 PM |
0x80042108 Error with Outlook 2003 / SBS 2003 Premium/ ISA Server | S.W. | Outlook - Installation | 0 | January 16th 06 08:53 PM |