A Microsoft Outlook email forum. Outlook Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Outlook Banter forum » Microsoft Outlook Email Newsgroups » Outlook - General Queries
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Outlook 2003



 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 18th 07, 07:59 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Pete
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Outlook 2003

I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a specified
account it should be perminently deleted. This is actually the third of
three rules which is designed to deleted all spam, i.e. I am catching valid
mail with the first two rules and anything that fails those tests should be
perminently deleted.

However when such an Email arrives, a warning box appears advising that I
dod not have permission to carry out this action! The rule is then
automatically disabled, until I enable it and the whole process starts
again.

With the rule disabled offending Emails reach my Indox. If I then run the
run on my inbox the messages are then perminantly deleted without any issue.
Can anyone explain this?

Why do I not have the necessary perminssion when I am recieving the Emails,
but once I have got them all is well and they can be perminently deleted.

PWS


Ads
  #2  
Old February 19th 07, 12:51 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Gordon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,554
Default Outlook 2003

Pete wrote:

I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a specified
account it should be perminently deleted. This is actually the third of
three rules which is designed to deleted all spam, i.e. I am catching
valid mail with the first two rules and anything that fails those tests
should be perminently deleted.

However when such an Email arrives, a warning box appears advising that I
dod not have permission to carry out this action! The rule is then
automatically disabled, until I enable it and the whole process starts
again.

With the rule disabled offending Emails reach my Indox. If I then run the
run on my inbox the messages are then perminantly deleted without any
issue. Can anyone explain this?

Why do I not have the necessary perminssion when I am recieving the
Emails, but once I have got them all is well and they can be perminently
deleted.

PWS


That's a dangerous way of doing it. You can GUARANTEE that at some point, a
valid email that you ought to have read will be permanently deleted. Then
there's not even any way of knowing that you even received it. Change the
rule to just "delete" and not "permanently delete". trust me on this!
  #3  
Old February 19th 07, 01:46 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
PWS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Outlook 2003

On Feb 19, 12:51 pm, Gordon wrote:
Pete wrote:
I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a specified
account it should be perminently deleted. This is actually the third of
three rules which is designed to deleted all spam, i.e. I am catching
valid mail with the first two rules and anything that fails those tests
should be perminently deleted.


However when such an Email arrives, a warning box appears advising that I
dod not have permission to carry out this action! The rule is then
automatically disabled, until I enable it and the whole process starts
again.


With the rule disabled offending Emails reach my Indox. If I then run the
run on my inbox the messages are then perminantly deleted without any
issue. Can anyone explain this?


Why do I not have the necessary perminssion when I am recieving the
Emails, but once I have got them all is well and they can be perminently
deleted.


PWS


That's a dangerous way of doing it. You can GUARANTEE that at some point, a
valid email that you ought to have read will be permanently deleted. Then
there's not even any way of knowing that you even received it. Change the
rule to just "delete" and not "permanently delete". trust me on this!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I would ask you to let me be the judge of what I want to do, and not
to offer your advice on what you think I should do.

I believe my multiple posts, for which I apologise for, as well
actually enetering this particular thread (yes I have to use google
from work) asked a specific question. Why am I being told i do not
have permission to permanently delete when mail enters my Inbox from
downloading, but i can run the rule on my inbox manually and it works
fine.

PWS

 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(outlook 2003) office word 2003 wont be set as default editor Jason Outlook - General Queries 1 January 16th 07 05:37 AM
Outlook 2003: microsoft office outlook 2003 does not recognize fax numbers SteveMc Outlook - General Queries 4 December 20th 06 11:38 PM
Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003/Outlook 2007 combination creates duplicate folders [email protected] Outlook - General Queries 3 December 5th 06 05:32 PM
free / busy data in schedule - Outlook 2003 | Exchqange 2003 Matt Conlon Outlook - General Queries 0 May 1st 06 08:21 PM
0x80042108 Error with Outlook 2003 / SBS 2003 Premium/ ISA Server S.W. Outlook - Installation 0 January 16th 06 08:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Outlook Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.