![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All
Can someone confirm that this is expected behaviour . We want to acheive the following: Deploy Outlook 2003 SP2 on all machines. Some of the machines already have olders versions of Office and some have nothing at all. I am not particularly concerned about Office, only the Outlook component. Office is out of scope but if it all gets upgraded with the Outlook work, then fine - double bonus. Here is what I have done: Created an installation point for Office on a network share Patched the installation point with SP2 Created an MST file which contains some Outlook profile settings. The MST file does not do anything with the other Office applications, they are configured as not available with a red cross next to them. Here is what happens when I run setup.exe with the TRANSFORMS option: 1. On machines that don't have Office installed Outlook SP2 is deployed and the customisations in the MST file work- Great all fine. 2. Machines that do have Office installed (including Outlook) but an older version the complete version of Office is upgraded to SP2 and the Outlook customisations work. - Great all fine even though I only expected Outlook to get upgraded????? 3. For machines that have the current version of Office (SP2) installed nothing appears to happen and the Outlook profile customisations are not applied. - Not good 4. For machines that have Office but no Outlook becuase it was uninstalled again nothing happens. I was expecting Outlook to get deployed and added to the existing offuce install as per the per the MST file - Not good but we can live with this as it will be so few machines Can someone try and explain this lot for me, is this expected behaviour I am seeing? Should I just create an Outlook administrative point and take office out of the equaion?? Thoughts, advice Thanks AJ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Deployment of Outlook 2003 with MST-file over Office 2000 goes wro | KoJo | Outlook - Installation | 0 | January 22nd 07 03:17 PM |
Problem changing behaviour from MST Outlook profile with PRF file. | Kevin | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | November 9th 06 09:08 PM |
Outlook Deployment using GPO / MST | Keith Schlottman | Outlook - Installation | 8 | April 25th 06 07:43 AM |
Help building MST file with Outlook 2003 and Windows XP | Gordon | Outlook - Installation | 15 | March 28th 06 02:11 AM |
Outlook install ignores settings from .mst file | Ryxnet | Outlook - Installation | 0 | January 25th 06 05:10 PM |