A Microsoft Outlook email forum. Outlook Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Outlook Banter forum » Microsoft Outlook Email Newsgroups » Outlook - General Queries
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Outlook Rules Problem



 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 22nd 07, 10:49 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Remove ABCD from Email address to reply
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Outlook Rules Problem

I am running XP Pro with Office 2003 Pro.

I have an Outlook rule which essentially says that if certain words are in
the subject and the sender is not in my address book, mark it as read and
move it to the deleted folder. The rule does not always work and I find it
in the junk folder as unread. If I manually run the rule then it moves the
appropriate emails to deleted folder and marks it as read. I have Outlook
junk setting at high.

I am guessing that Outlook junk setting it getting applied before my rule is
getting applied.

Does anyone know how to make sure my rules are applied? Or do I have a
different issue that I have not even thought of?


--

Neil



  #2  
Old April 23rd 07, 12:11 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Brian Tillman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,452
Default Outlook Rules Problem

Remove ABCD from Email address to reply wrote:

I am guessing that Outlook junk setting it getting applied before my
rule is getting applied.


This is a correct conclusion.

Does anyone know how to make sure my rules are applied? Or do I have
a different issue that I have not even thought of?


There's no way to adjust the order of the processing. The Junk filter gets
first crack at the messages.
--
Brian Tillman

  #3  
Old April 23rd 07, 01:38 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Remove ABCD from Email address to reply
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Outlook Rules Problem

Thank you for the response. I am trying to figure out if I have any option
which might reduce this problem. If I were to the level of my junk setting
from high to low would this affect my rules, can I have a rule run upon
receipt for the junk mail folder or there is something called custom action
which I know nothing about.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Separately, I have a rule which works fine and there is exception which
states do not perform action if the sender is in my contact folder. I would
like to add an additional folder to the rule (from Business Contact Manager)
if that is possible but can not figure out if that is possible.

--

Neil


"Brian Tillman" wrote in message
...
Remove ABCD from Email address to reply wrote:

I am guessing that Outlook junk setting it getting applied before my
rule is getting applied.


This is a correct conclusion.

Does anyone know how to make sure my rules are applied? Or do I have
a different issue that I have not even thought of?


There's no way to adjust the order of the processing. The Junk filter
gets first crack at the messages.
--
Brian Tillman



  #4  
Old April 23rd 07, 03:21 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Brian Tillman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,452
Default Outlook Rules Problem

Remove ABCD from Email address to reply wrote:

Thank you for the response. I am trying to figure out if I have any
option which might reduce this problem. If I were to the level of my
junk setting from high to low would this affect my rules,


Well, you could reduce the level of the junk filter processing and get more
messages to your Inbox, but this could lead to a higher level of junk in the
Inbox.

can I have a rule run upon receipt for the junk mail folder or there is
something called custom action which I know nothing about.


The only folder where rules will run automatically is the Inbox. Even if
you created one with a custom action, it would run only on the Inbox and
after the junk mail filter was done.

You could consider disabling the built-in junk filter altogether and use an
add-in like http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/
--
Brian Tillman

  #5  
Old April 23rd 07, 05:04 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Remove ABCD from Email address to reply
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Outlook Rules Problem

Brian,

Thanks again for a clear response. I will consider my options, but do you
have any advise on the issue below?

I have a rule which works fine and there is exception which
states do not perform action if the sender is in my contact folder. I would
like to add an additional folder to the rule (from Business Contact Manager)
if that is possible but can not figure out if that is possible.


--

Neil


"Brian Tillman" wrote in message
...
Remove ABCD from Email address to reply wrote:

Thank you for the response. I am trying to figure out if I have any
option which might reduce this problem. If I were to the level of my
junk setting from high to low would this affect my rules,


Well, you could reduce the level of the junk filter processing and get
more messages to your Inbox, but this could lead to a higher level of junk
in the Inbox.

can I have a rule run upon receipt for the junk mail folder or there is
something called custom action which I know nothing about.


The only folder where rules will run automatically is the Inbox. Even if
you created one with a custom action, it would run only on the Inbox and
after the junk mail filter was done.

You could consider disabling the built-in junk filter altogether and use
an add-in like http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/
--
Brian Tillman



  #6  
Old April 23rd 07, 02:32 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Brian Tillman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,452
Default Outlook Rules Problem

Remove ABCD from Email address to reply wrote:

I have a rule which works fine and there is exception which
states do not perform action if the sender is in my contact folder. I
would like to add an additional folder to the rule (from Business
Contact Manager) if that is possible but can not figure out if that
is possible.


The exception is "except where sender is in the specified address book" and
the choices you get to make are from among those contacts folders you have
that are enabled as address books. Since the rule allows the selection of
only a single address book-enabled folder and since you're using an
exception and not a condition, I don't think you can accomplish what you
want; i.e., perform a specific action if the sender is in either address
book one or address book two. You're choices, as I see them, are to try to
use a condition instead of an exception, or to use a different exception,
sich as "except with specific words in the sender's address". If the sender
addresses are Internet addresses, the specific words can be their domains or
mailbox names (the part in front of the "@").
--
Brian Tillman

 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outlook 2003 Rules Problem PWS Outlook - General Queries 3 February 20th 07 07:14 AM
Problem creating new outlook express 6 message rules dotbowels Outlook Express 9 February 4th 07 08:18 AM
Outlook 2002 problem with rules [email protected] Outlook - General Queries 3 October 25th 06 02:19 PM
Outlook 2003 Rules, Problem not enough [email protected] Add-ins for Outlook 1 February 22nd 06 11:02 PM
Outlook Express Mail Rules Problem Bernie Kilshaw Outlook - General Queries 2 February 15th 06 03:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Outlook Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.