![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
my problem is my Outlook XP using 100 % of CPU when I receive more than 20 message. My configuration is: XP Pro SP2 last hotfix Office XP SP3 last hotfix The CPU is Pentium 4 - 2,8 GB I just try to change any configuration on Outlook. Can help me someone? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Senior" wrote in message
... Hi, my problem is my Outlook XP using 100 % of CPU when I receive more than 20 message. Same thing happen when you disable e-mail scanning in your anti-virus program? Using any anti-spam programs? My configuration is: XP Pro SP2 last hotfix Office XP SP3 last hotfix Maybe you meant "latest service pack". I just try to change any configuration on Outlook. Huh? -- __________________________________________________ Post replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. For e-mail: Remove "NIX" and add "#VN" to Subject. __________________________________________________ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't disable e-mail scanning.
My antivirus is Norton CE 10.0 and there isn't a problem on the other PC in my organization. I verify the PC with ad-aware, Spy Boots & Destroy and MS Spyware but there is any problem. I verify with officeupdate and there is any new fix. The problem understood after open/answer to approximately 10 email. Thanks for answer! "Vanguard" ha scritto nel messaggio ... "Senior" wrote in message ... Hi, my problem is my Outlook XP using 100 % of CPU when I receive more than 20 message. Same thing happen when you disable e-mail scanning in your anti-virus program? Using any anti-spam programs? My configuration is: XP Pro SP2 last hotfix Office XP SP3 last hotfix Maybe you meant "latest service pack". I just try to change any configuration on Outlook. Huh? -- __________________________________________________ Post replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. For e-mail: Remove "NIX" and add "#VN" to Subject. __________________________________________________ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Senior" wrote in message
... I don't disable e-mail scanning. My antivirus is Norton CE 10.0 and there isn't a problem on the other PC in my organization. The other PC (used for comparison) is not the one with which you are having a problem. Because of different hardware and software setup, two hosts may look the same but are not the same so one works and the other does not. It it likely that the hardware and software fingerprints of the two hosts are not identical. I have also many times seen where a setup was working for a long time and then stop working, often because of updates to the OS or applications. Scanning of e-mail by anti-virus software is duplication and unnecessary protection. You lose no coverage by disabling e-mail scanning. Also, you can simply disable e-mail scanning *temporarily* to see if the high CPU usage goes away. Because the AV program interrogates the data stream, incoming and outbound mails are delayed which can cause timeouts in the e-mail client. Also, all this scanning of the data traffic requires CPU cycles and that may be why the CPU usage goes up. Anything else you have inline with the mail traffic will also expend CPU cycles to interrogate that traffic, like anti-spam products. Even the firewall will slow network traffic although hopefully not by much. If you want to find out why CPU usage goes high during e-mail processing then you have to minimalize how much software is doing that e-mail processing. I verify the PC with ad-aware, Spy Boots & Destroy and MS Spyware but there is any problem. It doesn't have to be malware that is causing high CPU usage. Using e-mail scanning in an anti-virus product will consume CPU cycles to interrogate the mail traffic. Using anti-spam software to interrogate the mail traffic will consume CPU cycles. Using a firewall will consume CPU cycles. The more you add to interrogate the traffic, the more it gets slowed and the more CPU cycles are consumed (and the more memory you consume with those extra processes which could lead to using the pagefile which is the slow hard drive if you don't have enough real memory). |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|