A Microsoft Outlook email forum. Outlook Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Outlook Banter forum » Microsoft Outlook Email Newsgroups » Outlook - General Queries
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Max # of addressees



 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 9th 07, 07:59 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Panic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Max # of addressees

My friend told me that Outlook (I have O-2000 & he has O-2002) will only
send up to 100 addressees. That it will drop out any in excess of 100. He
says that's what his computer guru told him. I have a group (150) of
Aviation Cadet classmates and it appears to have sent to all the 150
addressees.

Any ideas?


Ads
  #2  
Old December 9th 07, 08:23 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,348
Default Max # of addressees

This has nothing whatsoever to do with Outlook. Those limits are set my the
mail server, not Outlook. Someone needs a new guru.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Panic" wrote in message
...
My friend told me that Outlook (I have O-2000 & he has O-2002) will only
send up to 100 addressees. That it will drop out any in excess of 100.
He says that's what his computer guru told him. I have a group (150) of
Aviation Cadet classmates and it appears to have sent to all the 150
addressees.

Any ideas?


  #3  
Old December 9th 07, 10:30 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
VanguardLH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 209
Default Max # of addressees

"Panic" wrote in message ...
My friend told me that Outlook (I have O-2000 & he has O-2002) will
only send up to 100 addressees. That it will drop out any in excess
of 100. He says that's what his computer guru told him. I have a
group (150) of Aviation Cadet classmates and it appears to have sent
to all the 150 addressees.



Your friend. He says. So why do you care about his sending problems
when trying to spew out bulk mail that exceeds the anti-spam quotas
for the *personal* email account that your "friend" is using? You
will have to find out what are the anti-spam quotas for YOUR email
account, and only your email provider can answer that question since
THEY are the ones that enforce that anti-spam quota.

  #4  
Old December 9th 07, 11:12 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Panic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Max # of addressees

"VanguardLH" wrote in message
...
"Panic" wrote in message ...
My friend told me that Outlook (I have O-2000 & he has O-2002) will only
send up to 100 addressees. That it will drop out any in excess of 100.
He says that's what his computer guru told him. I have a group (150) of
Aviation Cadet classmates and it appears to have sent to all the 150
addressees.



Your friend. He says. So why do you care about his sending problems when
trying to spew out bulk mail that exceeds the anti-spam quotas for the
*personal* email account that your "friend" is using? You will have to
find out what are the anti-spam quotas for YOUR email account, and only
your email provider can answer that question since THEY are the ones that
enforce that anti-spam quota.

Thank you for your courteous response. I don't send spam. But I do handle
the email for my Air Force pilot training group reunions. They (as I said
in my initial post) are the ones I am emailing. This is "personal" email
from my "personal" account. Russ' response confirms my suspicion that
addressee limits are only set by ISPs, not by Outlook itself.


  #5  
Old December 9th 07, 11:15 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Panic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Max # of addressees

Thanks, Russ. That's what I suspected. Perhaps his "guru" actually told
him that but he may have confused himself on what places any actual limit on
addressees. We both have "senior moments" these days.

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
This has nothing whatsoever to do with Outlook. Those limits are set my
the mail server, not Outlook. Someone needs a new guru.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Panic" wrote in message
...
My friend told me that Outlook (I have O-2000 & he has O-2002) will only
send up to 100 addressees. That it will drop out any in excess of 100.
He says that's what his computer guru told him. I have a group (150) of
Aviation Cadet classmates and it appears to have sent to all the 150
addressees.

Any ideas?




  #6  
Old December 9th 07, 11:24 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,348
Default Max # of addressees

Since you use Outlook, you might want to consider using a mail merge to
electronic mail instead of one message to so many recipients. That will get
around any limitations your mail server might impose.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Panic" wrote in message
...
Thanks, Russ. That's what I suspected. Perhaps his "guru" actually told
him that but he may have confused himself on what places any actual limit
on addressees. We both have "senior moments" these days.

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
This has nothing whatsoever to do with Outlook. Those limits are set my
the mail server, not Outlook. Someone needs a new guru.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Panic" wrote in message
...
My friend told me that Outlook (I have O-2000 & he has O-2002) will only
send up to 100 addressees. That it will drop out any in excess of 100.
He says that's what his computer guru told him. I have a group (150) of
Aviation Cadet classmates and it appears to have sent to all the 150
addressees.

Any ideas?





  #7  
Old December 9th 07, 11:26 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
VanguardLH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 209
Default Max # of addressees

"Panic" wrote in message
...
"VanguardLH" wrote in message
...
"Panic" wrote in message
...
My friend told me that Outlook (I have O-2000 & he has O-2002)
will only send up to 100 addressees. That it will drop out any in
excess of 100. He says that's what his computer guru told him. I
have a group (150) of Aviation Cadet classmates and it appears to
have sent to all the 150 addressees.



Your friend. He says. So why do you care about his sending
problems when trying to spew out bulk mail that exceeds the
anti-spam quotas for the *personal* email account that your
"friend" is using? You will have to find out what are the
anti-spam quotas for YOUR email account, and only your email
provider can answer that question since THEY are the ones that
enforce that anti-spam quota.

Thank you for your courteous response. I don't send spam. But I do
handle the email for my Air Force pilot training group reunions.
They (as I said in my initial post) are the ones I am emailing. This
is "personal" email from my "personal" account. Russ' response
confirms my suspicion that addressee limits are only set by ISPs,
not by Outlook itself.



Rather than sending out 1 email to hundreds of recipients, why not
send 1 email to each of them? You can use MailMerge in Word (if you
have Word) or some bulk mailing program (several are listed at
www.slipstick.com). Outlook was designed to be a personal e-mail
client (with support for corporate features), not a bulk mailing
program. MailMerge might work but it has no control over how fast you
send those individual emails. Some ISPs restrict how many emails you
can send per minute and might also restrict how many mail sessions
every 1 or 5 minutes. This is to reduce email traffic to what would
be considered appropriate for a *personal* email service.
Alternatively, your email provider may have other plans to which you
can subscribe. Or you could check into listserver services for
sending out bulk mailings.

  #8  
Old December 10th 07, 06:13 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Panic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Max # of addressees

"VanguardLH" wrote in message
...
"Panic" wrote in message
...
"VanguardLH" wrote in message
...
"Panic" wrote in message ...
My friend told me that Outlook (I have O-2000 & he has O-2002) will
only send up to 100 addressees. That it will drop out any in excess of
100. He says that's what his computer guru told him. I have a group
(150) of Aviation Cadet classmates and it appears to have sent to all
the 150 addressees.


Your friend. He says. So why do you care about his sending problems
when trying to spew out bulk mail that exceeds the anti-spam quotas for
the *personal* email account that your "friend" is using? You will have
to find out what are the anti-spam quotas for YOUR email account, and
only your email provider can answer that question since THEY are the
ones that enforce that anti-spam quota.

Thank you for your courteous response. I don't send spam. But I do
handle the email for my Air Force pilot training group reunions. They (as
I said in my initial post) are the ones I am emailing. This is "personal"
email from my "personal" account. Russ' response confirms my suspicion
that addressee limits are only set by ISPs, not by Outlook itself.



Rather than sending out 1 email to hundreds of recipients, why not send 1
email to each of them? You can use MailMerge in Word (if you have Word)
or some bulk mailing program (several are listed at www.slipstick.com).
Outlook was designed to be a personal e-mail client (with support for
corporate features), not a bulk mailing program. MailMerge might work but
it has no control over how fast you send those individual emails. Some
ISPs restrict how many emails you can send per minute and might also
restrict how many mail sessions every 1 or 5 minutes. This is to reduce
email traffic to what would be considered appropriate for a *personal*
email service. Alternatively, your email provider may have other plans to
which you can subscribe. Or you could check into listserver services for
sending out bulk mailings.


Those are all good suggestions. I haved saved your post to consider later.
I have Word 2007 which defaults to saving documents as .docx files. Maybe I
can use the option to Save as (older) .doc files to insure everyone can read
it.



  #9  
Old December 11th 07, 03:06 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Brian Tillman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,452
Default Max # of addressees

Panic wrote:

Those are all good suggestions. I haved saved your post to consider
later. I have Word 2007 which defaults to saving documents as .docx
files. Maybe I can use the option to Save as (older) .doc files to
insure everyone can read it.


You can configure Word 2007 to ALWAYS save in Word 2003 format.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
  #10  
Old December 12th 07, 06:24 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Panic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Max # of addressees

"Brian Tillman" wrote in message
...
Panic wrote:

Those are all good suggestions. I haved saved your post to consider
later. I have Word 2007 which defaults to saving documents as .docx
files. Maybe I can use the option to Save as (older) .doc files to
insure everyone can read it.


You can configure Word 2007 to ALWAYS save in Word 2003 format.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]


Would that cause me to lose any important features allowed by Word 2007?


 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How can I sort addressees by last name? dukebaker Outlook - Using Contacts 5 August 13th 07 04:43 AM
Hidden Addressees Pat Falango Outlook Express 3 December 12th 06 01:29 AM
Microsoft Outlook 2002 / Multiple addressees davestanyon Outlook - Using Contacts 1 November 24th 06 10:13 PM
Multiple addressees from one email into contacts Apprentice Outlook - Using Contacts 1 August 29th 06 04:28 PM
Sorting Addressees in New Message Annie Outlook and VBA 2 April 5th 06 03:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Outlook Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.