![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Vanguard:
Thanks for your note. The rule was created from scratch. Note that the rule does work as shown; messages from senders in the contacts folder do not get moved and stay in the inbox, but messages from all other senders do get moved.. But, rule that follows, the one that should move everything left in the inbox, never executes. There are no distribution lists in the contacts folder. None of the folders are overly large, typically less than a few thousand messages. The folders are not auto archived; I manually delete stuff from time to time that is more than a few months old. I'll try recreating the rule. I too have had problems in the past where a rule is corrupted, but in every case, that I know if, the system detected the rule as corrupt, or flagged that one of the parameters was not set (even though it appeared that it was set) "VanguardLH" wrote in message ... Dab wrote: I know the sender is in the contacts because I created a created a test contact from an email that I received from another one of my email accounts. I then use that account to send some test emails from that account. The 'move except if' rule works but any subsequent rules don't work. I should have mentioned that the Contacts based move rules that down work when automated, work just fine when they're run manually. In all cases, I'm moving, not copying. Here is my rule list in order (for clarity, I've added some quotes to identify the fields that are actually underlined in the rule): ... Apply this rule after the message arrives move it to the 'Temp' folder except if sender is in the 'Contacts' Address Book and stop processing more rules If the exception is true then the stop-clause should not be honored. Have you tried deleting this rule and recreating it from scratch (and then position it in the rules list to this spot again)? I've had rules gets screwed up so their pointers to the folders (you see a name but the rule has a pointer) are invalid which means the rule doesn't know what to do (i.e., it is corrupted). See if deleting it and creating NEW copy of the rule gets it working as expected. Apply this rule after the message arrives move it to the 'Default' folder and stop processing more rules The the last rule doesn't work whether the stop processing more rules is included or not. Wouldn't matter. The problem is that you are not *getting* to the last rule. It's not that it doesn't work. It's that it is not getting reached. If there are thousands of contacts, it will take a long time to scan all of them. So you might think the rules have completed their execution when they really have gotten stuck on your contacts rule. Do you have a lot of distribution lists? Are contacts listed in more than one of them? Are there a LOT of items in the Temp folder? Does this folder get periodically emptied (by using the auto-archive function with permanent delete on expired items in this folder)? Or is this a titan-sized folder with hundreds or thousands of items in it that you obviously don't want? First delete the problematic rule and create a new one for it (or did you do that already? or did you just disable the old rule and use this new one?). The rule might be corrupted. You could try redefining the problematic rule before deleting and recreating it. Go to each clickable entry and select a different folder, then click the entry again and select the original folder. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reminder not working when expected | Penny | Outlook - Calandaring | 1 | September 20th 07 08:02 AM |
Recurring bookings not working as expected | Nuzza | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | April 10th 07 03:50 AM |
Outlook resource Author privileges not working as expected | littleccguy | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | April 5th 07 10:02 PM |
Upgraded to Outlook 2003 but rules is not working | Jay Velarde | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | October 12th 06 05:02 PM |
Outlook Rules Not Always Working | [email protected] | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | July 20th 06 11:52 AM |