![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The received mail notification envelope on the task bar does not go away when
mail comes in that is permanently deleted by rule. (So there is no mail to read.) I must close Outlook and restart to remove it. How can I fix this nuisance? I use Outlook 2003 SP2 with all updates. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bg44 wrote:
The received mail notification envelope on the task bar does not go away when mail comes in that is permanently deleted by rule. (So there is no mail to read.) I must close Outlook and restart to remove it. How can I fix this nuisance? I use Outlook 2003 SP2 with all updates. Suppose you had two messages come in during the send/receive and the first one of them matched your rule and was permanently deleted, but the second one did not. How happy would you be if your first rule turned OFF the new mail alert? Not very, I should think, since you still would have a new message. A rule has no idea if it's operating on the first, middle, or last unread message in the Inbox, so it has no control over the new mail alert process. The bottom line is, you can't fix it. It isn't broken. That said, however, with Outlook 2003 SP2, rules are SUPPOSED to execute PRIOR to the process that turns on the new message alert (at least, I thought I had read that), so that if no unread messages remain , the new message alert isn't supposed to appear. Thus, I can't explain why you see this. -- Brian Tillman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian Tillman" wrote: bg44 wrote: The received mail notification envelope on the task bar does not go away when mail comes in that is permanently deleted by rule. (So there is no mail to read.) I must close Outlook and restart to remove it. How can I fix this nuisance? I use Outlook 2003 SP2 with all updates. Suppose you had two messages come in during the send/receive and the first one of them matched your rule and was permanently deleted, but the second one did not. How happy would you be if your first rule turned OFF the new mail alert? Not very, I should think, since you still would have a new message. A rule has no idea if it's operating on the first, middle, or last unread message in the Inbox, so it has no control over the new mail alert process. The bottom line is, you can't fix it. It isn't broken. That said, however, with Outlook 2003 SP2, rules are SUPPOSED to execute PRIOR to the process that turns on the new message alert (at least, I thought I had read that), so that if no unread messages remain , the new message alert isn't supposed to appear. Thus, I can't explain why you see this. -- Brian Tillman |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New mail notification | swanny | Outlook Express | 11 | August 26th 08 11:58 PM |
No new mail notification | Saywhat | Outlook Express | 2 | May 1st 06 03:51 AM |
new mail notification | Lynne | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | February 14th 06 10:41 PM |
New Mail Notification | Lynne | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | February 14th 06 05:44 PM |
Envelope Notification | david30816 | Outlook - Installation | 0 | February 4th 06 10:39 AM |