![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
I am having this problem too. I run a business with many branches and at times need to know what address the sender used to get to me. As for replying with the correct address I use POP accounts (with SMTP of my ISP) for each of the 'branches' addresses for me. When I need to send from an address other than my default, I just change to the correct 'account' i need. As for the incoming 'to' address: I know that exchange 'knows' this as it is in the internet header and users of Entourage on the Mac will know that the chosen full address shows in the 'to' field there. There must be a way of turning it on in outlook. Why I am not using Entourage? I need to work with delegates and can't do this with my exchange provider and Entourage. I also do not want to pay for individual mailboxes for each address as I pay per box. I hope there is a solution out there. Regards Ross "Danno" wrote: Hi Diane, This works perfect for replying to messages in mailboxes that are opened as additional mailboxes in Outlook. The From field shows that its coming from that additional mailbox. However, this doesn't work when composing a new message. When composing a new message, you cannot get the From field to display and it's not an option in the View menu. This presents a problem if the user wants to compose a new message and send as another user. Thanks for your help! Dan "Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote: You'll need separate inboxes for best results, as Exchange has no way to know which address it was sent to. This is also a good use for public folders. In either case, add send as permissions to the mailbox or folders and the user can send as those addresses. I use a SMTP script (from vamsoft.com) to add an x-header with the To address - it doesn't show in the inbox, but I could use rules to flag or views to color the messages based on that information in the header. To send using other addresses you'll need to add mail accounts - I recommend IMAP accounts so you don't accidentally download messages off the server - then choose that account when you send. If you use public folders or additional mailboxes, you won't need an IMAP account - just add the mailbox as a secondary mailbox and with send as permission, the user just needs to hit reply. -- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide) Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/ Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter: "Ken" wrote in message ... I have an Exchange 2003 mail box for a user who receives email for many address (ie, , , ) They all flow into his Inbox correctly however he can't tell who the messages were orginiall sent to. I would think that the To field would show who the message was to. It only shows his default mail address. I have the requirement to possibly reply to messages using the original to email address. ie joe@domain replies as joe@domain and joe@anotherdomain replies as . How in the world is this accomplished? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can't add contact Outlook 2003/Exchange/SBS 2003 | Jim G | Outlook - Using Contacts | 7 | May 9th 06 04:03 PM |
Alternate email configurations in outlook 2003 POP / Exchange ? | David Ulrich | Outlook - Installation | 1 | May 6th 06 05:36 PM |
Calendar View shows 2 contact folders not calendars (Outlook 2003, Exchange 2003, WinXP Pro) | [email protected] | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | March 15th 06 03:23 PM |
Suppress Outlook 2000 from automatically retrieving Exchange 2003 Email | Ed_No_Spam_Please_Weber@Weber_Spam_Not_Enterprises.Org | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | March 5th 06 04:01 AM |
Outlook 2003 will not connect to Exchange 2003 via terminal server session. | Bagger | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | January 25th 06 05:28 AM |